this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
172 points (98.9% liked)

politics

28782 readers
2889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You first, asshole!

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that’s what he wants. It’ll give him the support needed to further escalate to a full fledged war or an excuse to drop a goddamn nuke to end it.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anything to distract from the Epstein Files.

[–] baronofclubs@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

Agreed, but at what point do his deplorable actions as President of the United States of America surpass that of the Epstein Files? Sure, he's a incestual pedophile rapist, but he's also slaughtering over a thousand men, women, and children, purporting to represent a country of 300 million citizens who mojorily disagree.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder if Iran would go after Trump & Maralago? Like they have to know the very large majority of Americans are against this war.

[–] oleastre@social.trom.tf 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

@Sunflier @tidderuuf For or against the war, a primary school was targeted on the first day.
I would not expect better.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. When you purposefully kill a bunch of children as a first strike you're almost DEMANDING similar retaliation. It's like they want Iran to attack on US soil.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That would likely provide just cause for martial law. And people couldn't do anything about the -Philes.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can't really expect them to care how many Americans are against the war as long as it's not enough to stop anything.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

I'd like to think most individuals in a war don't actually want the war, but given how unlikable the US is, I really wouldn't put it past a majority to want to see harm done to anyone from or in the US. I also couldn't blame them, either.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 1 points 18 hours ago

Do they?

Look at the propaganda we’re fed and then remember that most of them don’t have access to the wider internet. Their own government and no doubt Israel are probably pouring a strict diet of anti western propaganda straight down their throats.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

It's not even that.

They can't penetrate American missile defenses, we're too far away, we'll see it coming.

And the White House is built to prevent terrorist attacks, not just the building but the layout of the grounds and distance from other stuff.

A terrorist could book a room at Marlago and likely have a busboy wheel the explosives in a suitcase.

They don't even really need to blow it up, just burn it down with shit they find.

Honestly it seems naive to think that a significant percentage of marlago guests aren't spies and terrorists these days.

With how common empty rooms for long stretches have been as bribed, someone could have a room open for months/years before finally having a bad actor move in.

Hotels are notoriously dangerous for terrorist risks to feds, and that's routine travel not them basically living there.

I really think we'll see an attack on Marlago, just because that's where trump is most exposed. And we have dumbasses in charge of preventing it.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

They're destroying defense systems right now.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't mean to scare you but they already did the math and we can't stop every single missile. Our coastline is too big

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone that told you Iran can hit America with a missile is lying to get an increase ind defense spending.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

The claim is that a container ship could be used as a drone carrier.

This claim was used to justify attacks against Iranian shipping companies.

The truth is that it is possible to use a container ship this way, and the US might not see it coming in time to actually do anything about it.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 16 hours ago

Epstein files?

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wish the big orange cunt would die soon. Some people serve this world best by leaving it.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Preferably hanging by his toes in jail.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We should do that thing from Futurama where Nixon had a big party for all the robots, but we do it with all the MAGA politicians and billionaires, and let Iran go to town on the party.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 20 hours ago

Maybe we should learn a lesson from Inglourious Basterds. Invite them all to a movie premier.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

With this and the comment about rising gas prices; How much more mask is even left to come off at this point?

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

For real. It’s almost like the mask never mattered in the first place.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 5 points 19 hours ago

Well, he hasn't personally murdered or raped or raped and murdered anyone on live television yet.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Some of you may die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

That response leads me to think he really is on death's door. He cares not a whit for the nation he currently rules over, nor for any other person more than for himself.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Every rich and powerful person gets spiritual before they die, and that includes "brain backup" delusions of techbros.

They're faced with the one thing money can't always solve, and anything is better than dying

Even causing Armageddon because rapture isn't technically dying.

Or the AI singularity because you think it'll "appreciate" you enough to preserve you.

The problem is, there's always people on deaths door. The solution is only picking leaders who have something to live for after office.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

The narrative path of “Epstein files are all over the news which Trump hates even if he’s never going to see real consequences, Trump learns he has X amount of time left, realizes he doesn't want to live his last days constantly hearing how much people not only hate him but see him for the disgusting monster he is, starts an war that is guaranteed to at least keep the news cycle occupied until he dies even if everyone else dies with him” does make some twisted sense

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Remember when Iran said they'd had a... what's the word... the religious word for death threat or whatever, on Shitler?

Like a year ago. Nothing happened.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You mean fatwa?