this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
557 points (98.3% liked)

memes

20463 readers
1459 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 6 points 3 hours ago

Just finished watching The Dinosaurs series, narrated by Morgan Freeman. I enjoyed the series overall, though I do find it difficult to suspend my disbelief and stop wondering what shit they completely made up, what has a firm scientific basis, and the extent to which the current understanding will be laughable in 20 years.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

Ok, but why the faces?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Forgot about prehensile eye stalks and stank glands, tho

Also cloacal vent ridges. Lots of those

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like feathered dinosaurs. I like imagining them being very colorful!

[–] CidVicious@piefed.zip 44 points 23 hours ago

Fun fact, they've done studies searching for pigments and found that dinosaur eggs, at least, were colorful like modern bird eggs.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am saddened that we will probably never know about not only all the cool colors and feathers that dinosaurs had, but also the various fleshy structures that they also probably had.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (7 children)

We do, actually! Recent research proved there are melanosomes in some fossils/imprints, which were previously thought to be bacteria. This gives us a fairly good idea of the colouring of certain species. Check out this sinosauropteryx:

I highly recommend reading the book Dinosaurs: New Visions of a Lost World. It's fun to read, has amazing illustrations and was written by one of the people who discovered this.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 34 points 23 hours ago

This is what I imagine an owlbear looked like

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The author of this book, Professor Benton has done talks on this https://youtu.be/ICzc8D0zQC0

[–] Klear@quokk.au 2 points 4 hours ago

Nice, thanks!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago

Aww, he is so cute. What a good boy.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That is so cool!

That guy looks fren shaped.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You want fren shaped? Check out this cutie!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 15 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Half moth, half frog, half cheetah!

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago

Mogtah? Cheemog?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Dope, I'm adding this to my reading list!

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Just ordered the book. Thank you!

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Feathers, but very simple filament-like ones. Remember - feathers haven't evolved for flight. No idea how cuddly they were (you'd have to ask a paleontologist), but I'm just going to assume "extremely".

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

What's the difference between simple filament like feathers and hair?

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I imagine it’s rather like bird hatchling down, which is very structurally basic, and if so, it’s very brittle, and makes for a lot of dust.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Composition? I tried googling it. Found an article which says that while hair is made of keratin, feathers are also made of keratin, but the keratin is different.

¯\_(ツ)_¯

Maybe someone who knows what they are talking about will chime in. I am not that person.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Thanks for the clarification!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago

"I like my imagination more than I like learning about nature"

Feathers are fucking rad and I can't wait for more weird critter traits

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I for one like theropod chickens.

Scaling up a regular chicken always seemed more realistic & intimidating.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 42 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

From my understanding, existing fossilized skin evidence suggests that T. rex had few feathers, if any.

Edit: I mean adult T. rex

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

T. rex was unfeathered (or at least the adults were) but other members of the Tyrannosaurus family were partly or fully feathered. Yutyrannus, for example.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

It was the trend then.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 22 hours ago

10/10 would revenge-crap on your car.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine a T-Rex, bobbing its head while walking around, like a chicken

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, no, not that fast due to it's size & weight of the head, but maybe having it's eyes closed while moving the head to not tax the brain too much (that chicken bobbing was a solution to allow the brain to be smaller & more efficient bcs the effort to simply stabilise the head & process only the image/objects in 3D space while only those objects are moving is way simpler & more efficient than calculating the POV's movements & accounting for those in real time too - it's why hunting predators usually have large brains, if you miss data at high speeds you'll just run into a tree).

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't make any sense when you consider that birds hold their heads still while flying and are very good at spotting things on the ground while doing it. The reason I know for why birds bob their heads is that they can't move their eyes in their sockets. So they both their head forward the same way our eyes will jump from position to position rather than move smoothly, it minimizes the blur you get from rapid movements.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

When flying all objects are fairly far so it's like their POV isn't really moving (it's not a yes/no, it's by how much).
(A stupid example: you can read big road signs while shaking you head but not as easily from a paper in front of you. The movement of your head is smaller relative to the sign. Or why when taking pics of the stars it doesn't matter if the exposure is 12+h even if Earth has moved so much around the sun in that time.)

On the ground the distances are a lot smaller & more relevant. So chickens stabilise their had in fixed spots as much as possible (and "don't look" while bobbing).

If they bobbed their had bcs of their limited eye socket movement (they can move them a little, some species a lot) they wouldn't do it when not changing the direction of where they are looking.

(It's prob also why you can hypnotise a chicken in a second with one move of your finger but not eg a parrot with more brain buffer.)

But we all do it, humans (prob mammals) have this trick when you "lose time" when calm & moving the eyes and/or head from one object to another. We don't perceive it as such unless you look for it (you don't remember the details of the panning even when you know it took you a few tenths of a second - but you do when eg playing sports). A bit like you stop processing your nose in your fov. Or how you don't really remember having your eyelids closed when blinking.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Anybody that's grown up around chickens knows how terrifying a territorial rooster can be.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 22 hours ago

Ikr? A big chicken would eat me like a snack just opportunistically (maybe some ultra specialised species like pigeons wouldn't, but chickens def would, they eat everything).

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

Just like fashion, it’s cyclical.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Chickens are awful creatures, a giant one would fuck you up for absolutely no reason

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is chicken slander, they're chill af once you get them to trust you.

Roosters are demons though.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 21 hours ago

Beware the giant cock!

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

Chickens are awful creatures, a giant one would fuck you up for absolutely no reason

But if we Jurassic park these mutherfuckers I guarantee KFC would start serving up Kentucky Fried Dinosaur.

Man they'd probably taste fricken awesome. And the occasional news story of a battery farm of dinosaurs getting mass released into the environment, towns getting overrun by giant feathered dinosaurs would be a sight to see.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago

I saw a chicken the other day. Horrible creatures.