I wish her the best of luck, but seriously, I’m to the point now where I sincerely think a clean break from the DNC and the creation of a new party is going to be a better move. Get all the progressives to do that, and you’ve got the nascent core of a new party that actually aligns with the interests of the vast majority of citizens.
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
213 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25872 readers
3437 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The fascists proved that it's easier to appropriate an existing tool than build a new one from scratch.
Yeah, creating a new party even with incredible organic support would take 3-4 2-year election cycles to shift the balance, and we have about 13 months before we're very likely not even having reliable elections.
Yeah building profile takes time, building credibility takes time. Doing that in every electorate and demographic takes time and money.
Plus any new left wing party would have the full force of the regime against them. Finances would be shut down, leaders harassed and arrested, wide scale disinfo campaigns, their media reach would be throttled by compliant tech and traditional media companies.
The regime has began doing that to the democractic party, but have to move slower with a known national institution like the Dems, than they would with a new and unknown party.
I think I disagree because there are just so many ridiculous roadblocks to ballot access for third parties in different states, plus even if you can overcome that and win you'll run into a bunch of institutional roadblocks if you don't caucus with a "major" party (e.g. if you want a seat on one of those bipartisan committees that hash out 90% of the discussion on a lot of boring-but-important stuff before it even gets to the legislature), but I can definitely see where you're coming from
It's a nice thought but personally I think it would split the vote and nobody but Republicans will be able to win for a long time.
Democrats have done nothing to earn our vote, their entire policy for years has been 'we are not Trump' despite being exactly like him. At this point they can't be trusted to represent our needs in government because they are owned by the same bankers and corporations that own Republicans. If people support 3rd parties and the DNC suffer losses because of it that's their creation.
Better for building a principled platform, sure, but way worse if we actually want that platform to win. Basically every new successful party in this country emerged when one of the existing parties completely dominated the other.
If we want a progressive party, step one is to keep the Republicans from winning anywhere. Destroy the Republicans, and you give politically savvy progressives the confidence to vote progressive without risking abject fascism.
Yeah and you're definitely the first person to ever think this...
Oh wait.
Who shit in your coffee this morning?
What I like about her campaign is the fundraising spends the money on things that matter to people: mutual aide. Many of us saw recording breaking fundraising followed by a loss and asked, what if we spent that money on things we wouldn't regret? And Kat answered.
Reformists will always fail
In the long run, so do revolutionaries.
Revolutionaries (with active parts in the revolution) should never hang around after the revolution.
Not many self-ban from public offices on regime changes tho, so you kinda just hope they die/get killed before the revolutionary ideas in the masses do (like France).
