I wish her the best of luck, but seriously, I’m to the point now where I sincerely think a clean break from the DNC and the creation of a new party is going to be a better move. Get all the progressives to do that, and you’ve got the nascent core of a new party that actually aligns with the interests of the vast majority of citizens.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
The fascists proved that it's easier to appropriate an existing tool than build a new one from scratch.
Yeah, creating a new party even with incredible organic support would take 3-4 2-year election cycles to shift the balance, and we have about 13 months before we're very likely not even having reliable elections.
Yeah building profile takes time, building credibility takes time. Doing that in every electorate and demographic takes time and money.
Plus any new left wing party would have the full force of the regime against them. Finances would be shut down, leaders harassed and arrested, wide scale disinfo campaigns, their media reach would be throttled by compliant tech and traditional media companies.
The regime has began doing that to the democractic party, but have to move slower with a known national institution like the Dems, than they would with a new and unknown party.
I think I disagree because there are just so many ridiculous roadblocks to ballot access for third parties in different states, plus even if you can overcome that and win you'll run into a bunch of institutional roadblocks if you don't caucus with a "major" party (e.g. if you want a seat on one of those bipartisan committees that hash out 90% of the discussion on a lot of boring-but-important stuff before it even gets to the legislature), but I can definitely see where you're coming from
It's a nice thought but personally I think it would split the vote and nobody but Republicans will be able to win for a long time.
Democrats have done nothing to earn our vote, their entire policy for years has been 'we are not Trump' despite being exactly like him. At this point they can't be trusted to represent our needs in government because they are owned by the same bankers and corporations that own Republicans. If people support 3rd parties and the DNC suffer losses because of it that's their creation.
Better for building a principled platform, sure, but way worse if we actually want that platform to win. Basically every new successful party in this country emerged when one of the existing parties completely dominated the other.
If we want a progressive party, step one is to keep the Republicans from winning anywhere. Destroy the Republicans, and you give politically savvy progressives the confidence to vote progressive without risking abject fascism.
Yeah and you're definitely the first person to ever think this...
Oh wait.
Who shit in your coffee this morning?
What I like about her campaign is the fundraising spends the money on things that matter to people: mutual aide. Many of us saw recording breaking fundraising followed by a loss and asked, what if we spent that money on things we wouldn't regret? And Kat answered.
Reformists will always fail
In the long run, so do revolutionaries.
Revolutionaries (with active parts in the revolution) should never hang around after the revolution.
Not many self-ban from public offices on regime changes tho, so you kinda just hope they die/get killed before the revolutionary ideas in the masses do (like France).


