this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
161 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28935 readers
2296 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

So he’s turn the government into a patreon subscription?

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You know he’ll deny he was involved in this idea if it backfires. Some low level worker will get named, shamed and fired.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

~~Fired~~ promoted

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 63 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

I know this is getting to be a really tired rhetorical question, but... How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

History will not be kind to the turdy Republican congresscritters and senators who are letting Trump wreck the country.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 hours ago

Don't just blame Republicans. This lack of action in the face of this corrupt, treasonous, pedophile is the government.

Today our people can see that we're faced with a government conspiracy. This government has failed us. The senators who are a filibustering concerning your and my rights, that's the government. Don't say it's Southern senators. This is the government. This is a government filibuster. It's not a segregationist filibuster, it's a government filibuster. Any kind of activity that takes place on the floor of the Congress or the Senate, that's the government. Any kind of dilly-dallying, that's the government. Any kind of pussyfooting, that's the government. Any kind of act that's designed to delay or deprive you in need right now of getting full rights, that's the government that's responsible. And anytime you find the government involved in a conspiracy to violate the citizenship or the civil rights of a people, then you are wasting your time going to that government expecting redress.

  • Malcolm X, the Ballot or the Bullet
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

Trump's already been impeached twice, back in his first term. The Senate refused to convict on both occasions.

Then Biden's DOJ refused to prosecute the outgoing president for anything in the four years Democrats controlled the executive branch.

History will not be kind to the turdy Republican congresscritters

The Year is 1972 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 1987 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 2008 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 2026 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

Impeaching is like suing.

They could have impeached Obama for a tan suit, and convicted him of it in the Senate. Even if he had never worn a tan suit.

It's why it's supposed to be important who we send to DC, instead of just picking people who yell at the loudest at whoever we don't like.

They're supposed to represent our will, and they're clearly not.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Impeachment is a political process. You must have the votes in the House to impeach, then you must have the votes in the Senate to remove.

If a political party stands behind their guy and they have sufficient numbers, removal is simply not possible.

It is a political process, not a judicial process.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This statement should trigger 25th.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Add it to the mountain of them accrued even since before he was president the first time.

[–] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago

So not just blatant corruption, but blatantly treasonous corruption as well.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Join the gold tier, and get special access to the nuclear football!

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

He literally let Mar-a-Lago guests hold it during his first term. This timeline is immune to satire.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Let's just cut to the chase where he sells national secrets on eBay.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Don't be silly, he is using shadow brokers. The dark website where they auctioned off all of the NSA spying tools that were stolen that is.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 hours ago

Revoke this man's security clearance.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Why did Americans voted for this APE? Why?

Daily reminder that if you don't vote, you agree to all candidates.

John Roberts approves this message

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Pays six figures to get the national security briefing

Excited to tune into the President's Private YouTube Channel

Five hours of ads. One hour of the President saying what a good job he did.