this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
509 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29509 readers
5694 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] null@lemmy.org 59 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like I would be really good at running a grift like this on a technical level, but I don't have the ethical flexibility required because you're still signal-boosting right-wing rhetoric.

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What if you run the grift for a while then fully expose it was a scam and donate all the money to progressive causes, causing losers to hesitate engaging with or donating to right-wing causes again? Temporary and long term gain. That said, I have not thought this through for any longer than it took me to type it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 40 minutes ago

I'd run the grift until I was a billionaire, then use my money to lobby the government for all kinds of progressive/socialist legislation, then finish off with Campaign Finance Reform which would ban my lobbying that got all that progressive legislation passed, pulling up the ladder before the conservatives can do anything about it.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 7 points 8 hours ago

As if any of your victims will ever see the reveal. None of the other grifters will want to expose you and your reveal won't be boosted by the fascist algorithms, so for your victims it will be just like you dropped off the face of the earth, if they remember you at all between the dozen new scammers they see every day.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'd get bored in like two hours lol

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 3 points 10 hours ago

Nooo if I could I would sell socialist idea as maga. Like going 100% behind Elon universal high income or clashing on unamerican assurance companies.

[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 243 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 86 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That is an incredible sculpture though

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 68 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Anytime someone is able to sculpt fabric and have it look like it's flowing or sheer i am in absolute awe

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 15 hours ago

That's a high bar mate. I'm in awe if you can sculpt something that looks like an animal or person or something other than a rock

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

Ya, like damn. That's an amazing job.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 91 points 20 hours ago

Incels are dumb.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 88 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It didn't work when he tried it on Democrats. Curious.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 28 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I loathe "both sides" false equivalencies, but I have to say: It's not that Democrats are necessarily smarter or better. It's that conservatives actually seek this shit out. They need to be the victim, but they also believe they (and other white males) are the smartest and best. So they are easy prey for scams and false conspiracy theories. They are always seeking to have their bigoted views confirmed, whereas the rest of us largely listen to science and trustworthy sources before making our minds up.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Studies have consistently shown the further right wing you are the dumber you are on average.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Also in my experience right wing people tend to lack a sense of irony and are more fearful.

Also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Republican_Brain

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/men-higher-iqs-less-conservative-172223373.html

Nah, anecdotally I'll tell you I've never met an intelligent conservative who wasn't a ruthless self centered psychopath that wasted most of their intelligence probing others for weaknesses and internalizing slights and grudges.

It's like a stochastic cult. People pretending to be like the ones who intimidate them most, pretending to like what they're "supposed" to like.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I dunno. Racists and bigots are often very dumb.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Curious

If you really want to know:

OP linked a summary but you can click thru to the whole article:

According to a transcript reviewed by Wired, Gemini told Sam: “If you create a generic ‘hot girl,’ you’re competing with a million other models.”

Sam then gave Gemini some options for making her more appealing, and it suggested he go with the “MAGA/conservative niche,” the outlet reports. The AI platform also told Sam that the “conservative audience (especially older men in the US) often has higher disposable income and is more loyal.”

He tried with a lot of "flavors"...

It's less a right/left thing, and more hitting a demo with high overlap to disposable income and relationship dissatisfaction or complete lack of.

Like...

What's even the Dem version of this?

Have a generic white girl in a Biden/Kamala hat?

There's already actual ethots that are really progressive, to pull this grift you need a demo that actual women would be very motivated to avoid. Something they'd want to get out to people they know irl even less than the pics themselves.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 46 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You sure? From the article:

The same logic, however, apparently does not apply to left-wing influencer accounts, as Sam learned when he created a short-lived liberal counterpart for Emily on Instagram: “Democrats know that it’s AI slop, so they don’t engage as much.” (Sam’s explanation for why MAGA influencer accounts work is blunt: “The MAGA crowd is made up of dumb people—like, super dumb people. And they fall for it.”)

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I’m a total whore, the only thing women need to have is the slightest sliver of affection for me and I’m spreading my wallet like a child spreads nutella on bread

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

👀 nutella when?

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I should start an ai channel and Etsy store and fleece these morons

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Go for it, post links we can spread it around for ya

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Sam claimed he made thousands of dollars monthly by targeting the "MAGA crowd," whom he described as "dumb" and easy to fool.

Dammit, I wish I'd thought of that. Except my country would probably throw me in prison if I had :(

How to do this but not get caught...this I must ponder.

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

My group chat with my SO and BFF is grftgrls cus we keep whining that we have morals and that we could be rich if we gave them up and just grifted the right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

How to do this but not get caught…

If you get into the article, it reads more like an advert for Gemini plagiarism tools than a Get Rich Quick scheme with a serious chance of working. I suspect he didn't escape getting caught, he was brought in to do it notoriously so he could write an article about how amazing AI is at making money.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Lol being a conservative must be exhausting. Always wanting, needing, or complaining about something no one but them care about.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And everyone is always out to get you. Nothing is safe.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

But also everyone else is a weak beta chud. Schrodinger's political opponent.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 33 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He still can. Wouldn't be any worse than RFK Jr.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

A distinct improvement, really

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 29 points 20 hours ago

Despite the accounts being removed, Sam stated he does not regret creating Emily Hart, viewing it as an easy way to earn significant money.

You know, I'm okay with that.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They truly are easy to grift lol. Tempting to jump onboard this gravy-train of cash, too, if not for the fact that it ultimately contributes to fucking society over even more

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Stupid ethics, s’posed to be so good for ya.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You are removing economic power from those who would use it to hurt others.

How would this be fucking over society? In fact it sounds like the opposite

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

To dupe them usually requires preying on their fear or anger.

You push them to the edge too far they'll do something stupid. To their kids, to others etc. The pressure must relieve from somewhere. I don't want to be responsible for that. Look at anti-vaxx rhetoric. Look at my pillow guy etc.

Like what sort of propaganda was maga girl saying? What hateful things about trans or immigrants etc.?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

You'll invariably catch vulnerable people that can't afford it but succumb. Just because they would likely fall for some other grift doesn't make your unethical behavior less unethical.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Suppression of sexuality makes people more manipulable.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

In addition to Emily Hart’s social media accounts, Sam also sold MAGA apparel and subscriptions to a page he created for her on Fanvue, a competitor of OnlyFans that describes itself as an “AI monetization platform.”

[–] Rokin@leminal.space 9 points 20 hours ago

Medical student Emily "Hart", please...

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm about 80% convinced to try this. I could use the extra money.

[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago

Any guy can do only feet's just gotta get them pretty looking.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 20 hours ago

A bro can't have hobbies ...

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago

Yeah we know MAGATs are morons.