this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
138 points (98.6% liked)

politics

29715 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maiq@piefed.social 58 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All gerrymandering is rigging. This whole thing is fucking absurdity. The fact that republicans started doing it and the fact the democrats had no choice but to follow suit to stay competitive then the fact that a court of law says it's ok for republicans and not for democrats, this whole fucking thing is batshit. us democracy is a fucking joke top to bottom.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

democrats had no choice but to follow suit

Democrats had a number of opportunities to outlaw gerrymandering at the national level. They also had a number of opportunities to pack the SCOTUS, admit several more states (DC, Puerto Rico, American Samoa if they were feeling really feisty) guaranteed to put more Dem House Reps into Congress. They even had opportunities to just turn out more liberal voters by dumping financial resources into highly successful GOTV organizations like ACORN.

At every turn, they balked and made excuses and complained about optics. "When they go low, we go high!" was always just empty rhetoric. Dems never went anywhere.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'll be honest id care a lot more about what a Virginia politician has to say on the matter. Newsom ain't gonna be president, so it's annoying when their thirdway ass wants to keep hijacking the mic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Newsom ain’t gonna be president

I remember people saying the same shit about a low-rent NYC real estate tycoon.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Newsom isn't running to be the Republican nominee.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I really think we need reallow honor duels...

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago