this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
993 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11526 readers
1751 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Challenge Accepted!

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org -4 points 1 hour ago

And nothing if value would make it to the average American

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 31 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

the username should be stevens_good_advice

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

You beat us to it lol

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 46 points 11 hours ago

That is a fun fact!

[–] DaGammla@lemmy.ml 59 points 12 hours ago (45 children)

Doesn't work like that. It's more like fighting a Hydra. If a Billionaire worth $50B dies, like 10 Children are gonna inherit $5B each. So we would have even more Billionaires afterwards.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 7 points 1 hour ago

That just means we aren't done yet. Besides, quite a few of them would refuse their fortunes if it meant the went on the Most Wanted List.

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Sounds like an ever evolving target practice to me.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

From my experience playing Crusader Kings 2 and 3, gavelkind's a bitch.

Splitting your enemy's demesne amongst their successors gives you more but weaker enemies (and sometimes some friends), and leads to infighting and chaos amongst them.

Nine times out of ten murdering an enemy with lots of children leaves you better off than not murdering them.

(Of course, though, this scales inversely to the number of successors, so if there's only one or two proceed only if their stats are lower than your enemy's, or if it'll still be a few years before they come of age.)

[–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

Minecraft slime

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 0 points 1 hour ago

Maybe. Though, as MacKenzie Scott has demonstrated, someone who isn't a pathological wealth hoarder can do an insane amount of good in the world with billions of dollars. There might be some more MacKenzies among the many, many inheritors after The Best Two Months. Also, there will be a good mix of hedonists, free spirits, and good old fashioned fuckups who will increase the velocity of money.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 26 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

But the wealth would still be less centralized and they would be easier to kill for a while or have yo spend a larger percent on security its progress just because one virtuous heroic act doesn't immediately save everything doesn't mean doing a little bit every day won't make the world better because if you kill those five kids and kill their 25 heirs then you've just cracked the no billionaires mark! So its a couple years not a couple months the world would still be saved

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like work worth doing, a little extra time doesn't sound like a deal breaker to me.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

We'll all be out of work eventually. Nothing but time to hunt billionaires.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 85 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So you're saying we're distributing wealth from the top down? Splatter down economics?

[–] DaGammla@lemmy.ml 42 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting idea. Cut enough heads of the Hydra until the heads are so small, that they don't pose any threat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Also, there's like 1000 billionaires. 500 kids a month aren't getting shot.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

7 a day, works out to about 200 a month

Sickening figure that in my opinion, doesn't change at all when moving between 200 and 500. One is too fucking many

[–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

Yay, overpopulation got patched (/lh)

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your own link shows that you're wrong....

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe. It depends on how the OP statement is conceptualized. They specify "school kids" and school is only in session about half of days. Also, people over the age of 17 attend school and it isn't uncommon to refer to someone in their 20s as a "kid". Even worst case scenario for OP, we're talking the difference of four months versus two months. I'm not sure that's a hill to die on or even point out.

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The difference is that each head would be weaker and weaker until it's just a bunch of snakes like the rest of us.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

All we want is wealth distribution.

The more the family tree gets eliminated, perhaps those names further down the branches understand they don't want to die and do the right thing.

Younger generations want to end the progressive familial abuse patter of previous generations. This is no different.

load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›