The elections are rigged
this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29840 readers
2647 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Democracy" TM
If not outright election fraud, it's money used to spread info/misinfo. Like the voters who talked about the video they saw of Massie in a threesome with AOC and Ilhan Ohmar. AI generated out the wazoo.
If it's not money, it's legal election fraud in red states where voters are suppressed, voter rolls are purged, etc etc.
All of these things combined make for a great recipe of "democracy." Combine that with the fact that conservatives are, quite literally, not hyperbolic, a terrorist death cult, they truly do follow the leader right off the cliff's edge.
Winning inside the bubble is no challenge. Winning in the real world is what matters.
In 2010, Republicans thought they were going to have a bloodbath Midterms against Obama, and they got a whole bunch of whack-job Tea Partiers (the proto-MAGAs) to win their primaries against incumbents. Then they got to the general election, and they all lost against normal Democrats, badly blunting the Republicans' Midterms.
MAGAs always have a plan, but it's always a bad plan.
Money from a specific foreign nation.
It’s the “trump effect” sadly, I live in rural northern Nevada and with the midterms coming up I’ve been seeing a lot of political signs and pretty much all of the Republican candidates have “trump republican” on there signs. And sadly most of them will probably win by a large margin.
This is stupid. We're talking about primaries here and the approval rating among republicans are solid AF so yeah, Trump backed candidates are going to win because it's a god damn cult.
I'm sure that someone is going to go "BUT WHAT ABOUT OPEN PRIMARIES?" Come on, really? You think that Democrats or Independents are going to vote in a Republican primary in any numbers? You can barely get anyone to vote in a actual election much less a god damn primary of another party.
Cultist are going to cult here.
Yes, non-Republicans will vote in Republican primaries if the strategy is there.
My state is (now) firmly red. Whoever wins the Republican primary will almost certainly win the general. As such, voting for the least shitty Republican in the primary is far more useful than voting Democrat in the general. On top of that, at least my Democrat primaries have been very milquetoast. It doesn't make much difference who wins that.
That all makes it a very simple decision to vote in the R primary.
Uh huh.... What state are you in? Let's see how that goes, I'm sure there will be a record turn out in the Republican primary. I'll be waiting here with bated breath.
Bud, protest votes are a big thing in states with open primaries. Minimalizing the bullshittery and all that.
I myself am in Texas and have up until a few years ago been a "Registered Republican" on the official books. I haven't actually voted for anything remotely red since well before Obama. But that's how the system works. When your state is cooked, you find a way to oppose it, inside or outside the system. We are finally hitting the point where what's on the books vs what the actual sentiment is, it's starting to finally matter.
Uh huh... Sure looks like lots of people are sure using that open primary to affect Republican primaries in Texas. Glad that sane Republicans are winning races there...oh wait...
I mean I got the less shitty sheriff out of the deal. The judge I wanted lost. A few years ago I got the better justice of the peace. There hasn't been a dem contender in years for any of those positions. I would say I've done the proper and right thing. I have no actually affiliation with the gop but it has allowed me effectively fulfill my civic duty by helping elect the most fit local officials. My situation is not rare or unique.
Get the feeling you're responding to... not a person.
That being said I'm in the same boat in GA. Registered independent.
It’s AIPAC, not Trump. AIPAC controls even Trump.
for Massey, this was mostly AIPAC money even more than they spent on previous primaries to defeat Cori Bush. The playbook for successful APAIC operation is to never mention Israel. Just smear opponent. Not sure how Massey primary was conducted, though.
No the funding came from the tech sector because Massey opposed the building of an AI data centre.
I would doubt this. I'd especially doubt that a winning campaign would be to promise to give all KY electricitity to a datacenter. AIPAC did make a victory tweet. I didn't see campaigns, but I doubt it was focused on who loves AI the most.
Turnout in the primaries is incredibly low. So you get a very low representative sample of the electorate choosing the candidates, typically the most avid party loyal voters. So this drives the primary candidates to extremes. This is further exacerbated by gerrymandering, because the district is considered safe enough for the one part that the primary is basically the actual election.
This right here is the answer. Plus, that low primary turnout is more likely to be composed of the diehards, so angry MAGA in this case. My hope is that some of those primary wins come back to bite the party in the ass in the elections, but I’m not holding my breath. So far, this country seems to prefer Trump’s bullshit chaos to whatever brand of “progressive” the Democrats are propping up. Sad thing is if the Dems do actually win big in November, they will take it as a sign that their milquetoast corporate-owned liberals are what the country wants, rather than just voting against the fascist racists they are running against.
Ranked choice voting is needed and is long overdue and can help with multiple choices, parties and candidates
Might also help with third parties.
3rd parties won't be viable at the state or federal level without RC. or some other significant electoral reform. Over 99% of state and federal legislative seats are held by either Republican or Democratic nominees, and frequently an Independent or 3rd party incumbent won on the D/R ticket and then switched while in office. Not one EC vote for a 3rd party presidential candidate since 1968, and Perot won 19% of the national popular vote in 1992. We need to vote in the primaries to put progressives and pro-elecroral reform nominees on the ballot before we can effectively vote 3rds party beyond county level (unless you already have RCV).
This. My state had dismal primary turnout. Our good old boy, Regan-esque Republican incumbent governor won over his white nationalist challenger, but that win was carried by all those of us here who register Republican to vote in their primaries. He’s evil, but he’s a far more tolerable evil than his challenger. And that’s why our system is broken.
With Trump's approval ratings so low, how does he keep ousting GOP rivals?
Wrong question. This is like asking why some inmate is really popular in prison when everybody hates criminals.
Trump can oust GOP candidates in GOP primaries because it's the dum-dum club to begin with.
Money from AIPAC, and support from fascists, cowards, and morons.
That's really what the state of our democracy is right now.
Yeah I share a mailbox with a MAGA person and they get fundraising letters from various MAGA orgs like The Heritage Foundation almost every day. Some of them are pretty elaborate, like a 8.5x11 flat envelope with a huge glossy full color US flag on the front and back, or one that had what looked like a $1 bill inside.
My Gmail also got subscribed to trump emails somehow, I marked them as spam but when I look in the spam box I see multiple emails every day with personal messages like "Donna, I am personally asking you to help."
Add to that church preachers that tell their flock to donate X% of their money to Christian causes like this and there is a LOT of money from wealthy old people going into the hands of MAGA.
Money.
Because the polls aren't important. The base voters in his red state enclaves are all members of his cult. National approval ratings include cities and blue states. Look rather at his approvals in Idaho, Texas, Florida. As my grandmother would have said, he's gangbusters there.
With approval ratings so low, how was Jim Jones able to convince 1000 people to drink poison?
🙃
Honestly, they were going to die even if they didn’t drink the cordial. They were forced to drink it at gun point.
The point is they’re a cult.
Oh, I know. I was just making the point that they had no choice.
It might be the same picture?
The threat of violence is present in this case, as well.
Fucking hell. These news sources are deliberately stupid... The reason for it is that there will always be a permanent group of followers who will be convinced all the time. So his most loyal will continue to primary Republicans who even have a whiff of centrism.
Wait, are you seriously asking?
Money. The answer is shitloads of money.
It's not really an answer. If it were, his approvals would be a lot higher. The question is why, despite low approval rates, people still listen to him.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Isn't his approval rating still solid amongst his base? Are the oustings happening in the pastures or in more competitive areas?
His base by definition approves of him, the more interesting question is whether that base changes in size
load more comments
(2 replies)
Exactly, his approval rating isn't "low" at all. It's 39%, well above the approval rating of, say, Merz (19%) or Macron (27%).
I dont know the historical approval ratings of leaders of Germany and France at various points in their terms, but not sure if this is an "apples to apples" comparison. Macron won 28% of the vote in the first round, and Merz had something like 24%. Your point may be fair, but Trump won 49.8% of the vote in his last election, so the decline looks a lot more dramatic.
Call me a conspirisist but I'm of opinion that these are trial runs for rigged elections. Why not rig your own parties election as proof that you can do it bigger?
Agreed. He already gave away the playbook like day 1. Said there won't be anymore red and blue states. Said you'll never need to vote again. Guaranteed there will be no blue wave in November, but a surprise "win" for Republicans all around. They will use this to pretend they have the public's support in moving forward with all the terrible shit they've had to slow down recently. They are not popular. Massie is incredibly popular right now for the Epstein files. Trump wanted him out and had his people make him go away. I'd bet if Massie demanded a hand count, the results would be different. Elections are going to be a compromised joke moving forward until he is dragged kicking and screaming from the Whitehouse. They will continue to hold all the branches of government and claim they are winning elections in a landslide. Pretending they have the support of the populace when they don't.
The weapons industry is probably behind this.
I don't see approval ratings any different from normal. Where are they sinking?
He isn’t. Israel is. Trump doesn’t have any real power.
It's an identity cult. Radicalized morons are easier to manipulate than even King narcissist Trump.
Hopefully getting a MAGA chud as a nominee will lose them the general.
Dry run for the upcoming mid term cheating?
Approval ratings are meaningless in a mob rule. He got the connections and that is the only thing that matters in the US pedocracy. Approval ratings are for democracies.
view more: next ›