this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
639 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

84923 readers
3436 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago

You being wired doesn't stop WiFi seeing you.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Sure as well is awkward for a mobile phone.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago

Mass data mixed with machine learning pattern identification means what already exists will lead to broken as fuck capabilities for those who own everyone. Ie. Not us.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Ok now what router do I buy and what firmware do I flash to plug this into Home Assistant?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 34 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"Oh my goodness, this is a nightmare" typed everyone into their government approved location recording devices that can show them cats and boobs.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

wearing a smartwatch that constantly outputs an identifier.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 43 minutes ago

I am pretty sure you can find those on the MSG website!

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

and this is why you should flood your home with as many APs as possible. I have 17 APs running in my 1000sqft house.

can't find shit if it's too noisy.

[–] YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 minutes ago

What's an AP?

[–] mattreb@feddit.it 12 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

If you read the article ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3719027.3765062 ) they are testing this in an EXTREMELY controlled enviroment and directed subjects... I have my doubts that this could provide any insight on whether this is even feaseble for public surveillance, let alone effective...

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago

It's also only possible because the information they used (BFI) is unencrypted.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It gets more accurate with more access points, too. So corporate and education settings will be the easy places for this to get implemented.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 3 minutes ago

those places would just use surveillance cameras

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I can tell you as someone who read the papers on very early deepfakes and AI video generation with amazement followed by dread, this is going to be feasible on a large scale in a short period of time. Researchers do stuff on an absolute shoestring budget usually, it's incomparable to what large companies and governments have at their disposal. There are already consumer products that were able to become fairly precise motion sensors with just a firmware update. Next gen devices will be built with motion fingerprinting in mind, I can almost guarantee it.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Walk without rhythm and we won't attract the ~~worm~~ big brother.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The question with mandating US made routers may be either to protect citizens from foreign attacks - or to make sure every US router is a router with a government-approved backdoor.

On which option would you bet?

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Because they ignored the first issue for long enough, so it is more or less a non-issue for the US government.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

At this point I'd prefer the Chinese routers.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Identify" seems like a very misleading word in this context. Isn't it just detecting and locating? Or am I misunderstanding and they can tell me and my roommate appart?

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago

Height and body mass

[–] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 27 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

That's cool and all but if true, why use an animated photo instead of a real life example?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 53 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you think an "example" would look like. It's not taking a photo of you, it's measuring what's distinctive about the way you personally mess up radio signals and how it differs from how other people mess them up. Internally it's just a ton of numbers.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I assume they want to take those numbers and make a visual representation like a radar return or ultrasound image. Probably wouldn't really look like anything but still it'd be pretty sick to impress your friends by looking at your 2nd screen filled with green matrix vertical scrolling shit and be like: "the cat wants out."

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 18 hours ago

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Pretty sure this is old news? It's basically sonar, which The Dark Knight predicted in the film.

Edit: a word

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Like a submarine.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

The statement from the article was the unlike previously, they used current consumer equipment, and could uniquely identify a specific person. I believe previous versions could just identify that there was "A" person. I don’t know that all that is true, but it is what the article says, and my vague memories line up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Product idea: clothing with jaged edges and radio absorbing plates.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Funnily enough, indoors, this would probably make you more visible as the only area with no reflections. Stealth works outdoors because the sky does not have a radar return.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›