this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
144 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29932 readers
2539 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Way to go, American voters (or non-voters).

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

We don't know that the vote counts that were reported had ANYTHING to do with the votes that were cast.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is this the agreement Trump has claimed for weeks will come very soon?

[–] edg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How are so many people falling for this horseshit? It feels like I'm going insane.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

What really makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills is when I watch the markets - things like S&P and oil futures on the tail end of news like this.

I'm not sure if many people are already baking in the fact that he's a dumbass and so when he's proven a liar or has another TACO Tuesday it's NBD, or what...

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Iran knows what up they know they just gotta make it until midterms and all this madness ends.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A strait closure through November would be apocalyptic. Iran would be the least of our worries by then.

Nothing is going back to normal, ever. Not even if Trump loses and gives up power (0% chance of that IMO though). The damage is already done, it just starts to multiply faster the longer this goes.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If only there was a way to remove reliance on oil and its trade from the US and global economies. Like some kind of energy source that can be locally sourced or is so plentiful that it can be sourced from any number of other countries

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is, not just oil went thru Hormuz, but a good part of all the other trade goods.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

While true, without a drastic market squeeze, those who have the money won't invest it into alternative options until the cost of the status quo is higher than the alternatives for a long enough time

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The fertilizer is the real issue from a blockade. A "squeeze" on food markets generally kills people.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If memory serves, people tend to get overthrowy when their "leaders" allow them to get hungry. Not saying it's a good thing for people to starve, just saying that something will have to give if we are to do better than the status quo. The obvious downsides of this whole thing that numerous people loudly pointed out before (and still pointing it out) Trump started his stupid power grab including the straight are just coming true and at some point there stranglehold he and his ilk have on the people will break

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Issue is here it will not be the leaders that matter. Not isreal, not the us. It will be parts of India and SEA with increased prices everywhere hurting the most vulnerable people in nations first and hardest. The starving people will not be overthrowing the nations involved in creating this issue, they will likely take it out on governments that did nothing but rely on international trade.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You're right. There is no way that this doesn't end with Innocents getting caught in the crossfire. Ignoring all the Innocents that have already been caught in the crossfire of this and related political pissing contests or bullying

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do you remember those calculators we had as kids? They didn't have replaceable batteries, they just had a little gray box at the top that converted light from the room you were in into energy to run the calculator. It would be so cool if we could do something like that at scale. Unfortunately I think that was as far as they ever took that technology.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It might be overly optimistic of me but I genuinely hope this pushes more solar, wind, and nuclear power investments globally. Cuba just kinda proved a rapid conversion from oil based power is possible. We just need a global effort into sustainable and efficient batteries that can be made with local resources to match

[–] artyom@piefed.social 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Their best chance at making something happen is right now. Closing the strait (and associated gas prices) is killing Republicans. After midterms they lose that power because whatever happens already happened.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If republicans get massacred at the midterms the US is withdrawing completely from Iran the only reason they are still there is because congress is allowing it.

Will it? I think that's when the madness will really pick up steam!

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonder how many people this pointless war has killed, between combat, economic degradation, and shipping disruptions. I’d wager tens of thousands

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 1 day ago

how many people have profited from stock market manipulations based on Trunk’s “unpredictability” ?

[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

The great negotiator just keep saying no and you both don't get what you want.