this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

7803 readers
3315 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

My true colours are Gurple and Mzecknys

Anyone who says our angry side is our true colors. Or any side of ourselves is our true colors just sounds ignorant and mentally immature.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 2 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

People remember how you made them feel. Even if like you are the most clean cut, kind, patient individual. If you show them something alarming it sticks around a while. Like lack of emotional regulation. Angry is fine, but I find a lot of the time when people say they are angry sometimes they then describe something that is violent.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Thats the wrong understanding. You can absolutely be happy and kind with those being your true colors. However, someone pretending to be kind then turns out to be angry and mean, that is that person showing their true colors of not being happy and kind. The colors aren't the emotion, the colors are your authenticity whether happy or angry.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think the point was, both sides exist but arguably there's a bias towards calling the angry side the "true" side. It's also commentary about who gets to decide what the "true" side is.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Just an addendum, I’ve never heard anyone in my many years call anger someone’s true side, except to joke or reference. Tv and books like to do it, though.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You are very lucky.

TV and Books like to do it because it appeals to people who have been hurt, and there are people who do believe it. Can make it easier to move on from bad relationships too, by pretending that the good times were entirely fake and the bad times were the "real".

Like I still don't know why trying to get away with stealing from people was more important to my ex than maintaining a relationship with me, or why her idea of "loyalty" required me to back her against literally the world (mutual friends, some of my own family). I could have overlooked a lot. But stealing from people she called her friends, who had been there for her, one of them a poverty level single mother? No. Stealing from my family who I had a strained relationship with as it was, then lying to me about it? No. It's easier to believe that she was only interested in me for how much money she thought I would make than to think that her feelings were genuine but also that fucked up when it came to property.

It's also especially tough when someone claims to want to work things out but vacillates between whether they treat you like they believe you're really a good (or at least normal) person or really a secret bastard entirely based on their own mood and interpretation of the last few minutes. Months of no issues be damned, you were slightly snarky in a stressful situation, in response to their own short temper, which clearly shows those are your true thoughts and level of (dis)respect for them.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The only context under which I've witnessed it used directly with my own eyes and ears in person and not recorded were scenarios when a manipulative person was trying to coerce obedience in another. The manipulative, abusive individual accuses their victim / target of having "true colors" of a malign variety in order to attempt to motivate them to change their behavior as a defensive reflex to show the manipulator is wrong about them.

It's gaslighting, projection, and DARVO all the way down...

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That, I’ve definitely seen. Anger? No. Unless “let the hate flow through you” counts. This might sound obvious but I generally avoid people whose default emotion is anger.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah but none can say who is pretending to be kind and who is authentically kind. This interpretation doesn't leave room for "kind" people to ever get angry or have a moment of weakness where they're unintentionally mean. That's just a recipe for horrible mental health.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

Yeah but none can say who is pretending to be kind and who is authentically kind.

Right, which is why when people are kind no one is called out for being kind as their "true colors". You're understanding my position well. Its only when deception is revealed that "true colors" phrase is appropriate.

This interpretation doesn’t leave room for “kind” people to ever get angry or have a moment of weakness where they’re unintentionally mean. That’s just a recipe for horrible mental health.

I don't usually associate "true colors" phrase with a moment of weakness. I would think its the more unforgivable things that rank as someone calling out your "true colors". Example: If a person says they treat everyone with respect equally, but then uses racial slurs against people of color then that would be that person showing their "true (racist) colors".

A regular person will never have a racist-moment-of-weakness. A racist hiding their racism will though. That would be their "true colors".

[–] charokol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I think it’s more about the things you do and say when you’re angry than being angry itself