this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
183 points (97.9% liked)

politics

30195 readers
3206 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

When people understand that the Democrats are not our friends and take the same corporate PAC money as the Republicans, we might start seeing change in this country.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like what we need for people to understand this is for non-politicians to start running for election.

I don't know how that gets fixed when everyone who understands what's happening is being crushed by what's happening.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So what are you if neither party is representing you.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Disenfranchised.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 24 points 2 weeks ago

The Democrats position makes no sense if you think of them as an independent party trying to win vs the Republicans, but makes perfect sense if you think of them of the branch of the US political establishment meant to suppress leftist organization:

But there’s no hard evidence that discussing climate change hurts Democrats in elections, Mildenberger and other experts told Grist. If anything, it rewards candidates with a modest boost among voters, studies and surveys show.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Get big money out of politics and you'll get climate change as an issue with potential.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Power and money go hand in hand

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Here we are bickering about AIPAC buying our politicians but its more of a time share with big oil, big ag, and wallstreet.

it's all of those things and many more big money interests.

There's some competition, but regulatory capture is de facto.

It's exacerbated whenever conservatives control the legislature and executive, and obviously wildly out of control now that the supreme court is partisan from F society's scheming in lockstep with the rest. I don't understand how attempting to undermine and overthrow the constitution does not have any consequences when done so openly, but here we are.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

Once again.

Dems to strategists 6 months ago: ONLY TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY

I actually agree at this juncture.

Now: "Democrats aren't talking about anything other than the economy"

Well, yeah, that's the point tho. For once they're actually on message.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

More neoliberal news telling democrats to suck and be worthless to appeal to the mythical swing voters.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

"The world is on fire, but we are not going to do anything about it!"

"Why have younger generations mentally checked out?"

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless something catastrophic happens with the climate, the economy will always be the top issue because people have to eat. Presently, immigration, the war with Iran, danger to democracy, and climate change will be next in that order.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Let's talk again in December

Also, the climate is what allows us to have food, not "the economy"

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really? That's your takeaway?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn’t help the credibility of the data.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today -4 points 2 weeks ago

True, but the main subject should be the economy not climate change. Climate change would be a subtopic. For example, a candidate might say that switching to renewable energy will create jobs.