this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
518 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30175 readers
2467 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[Donald Trump] announced that his administration would no longer be enforcing the law for U.S. shell companies—and that no one would need to worry about prosecution for breaking the law. A few months later, Trump’s Treasury Department announced that it was destroying all of the filings the registry had compiled thus far, torching the database entirely.

This sounds like a cover-up to me.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

For all billionaires, not just Trump.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol it's a gift for the US billionaires club.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

All of the above

[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 99 points 2 days ago (6 children)

In what god forsaken way is this a sensible thing to do?

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well you see, now they themselves can spin up shell companies legally without having to be on the hook personally when said company does reprehensible shit.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plus there's demand for Congress to stop making money on insider knowledge. This allows them to hide that so much better.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Public servant was too nice for people to actually understand

These should be our slaves and must be beaten

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It makes perfect sense if the president is a money launderer.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Helps anonymize all bribes too. Like the ones that control all of our politicians. As if our republic wasnt already on fire, this pours more gasoline all over it and sticks knives in everyones back. Happy end of the republic day everyone.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Congress doing all it can to make itself a free market.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

There was recently a report from NPR about kushner and his dealings in albania.

She compares her investigation to opening a set of Russian matryoshka dolls, one after another. She's discovered several of the shell companies share the same address in Amsterdam and that each of them is worth a single euro.

They lead to the smallest matryoshka doll, a company named Interroyal BV, established with 18,000 euros in 2004 by a Russian citizen named Nikita Maximovich Vinogradov and a Bulgarian citizen named Zoya Georgieva Gyurova. Cela says each controls 25% of the company, but she says she hasn't been able to track either individual down. Neither has a public profile, but, on paper at least, she says the mysterious pair owns hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of Albanian property

https://www.npr.org/2026/06/16/g-s1-128162/albania-resort-protests-kushner-trump

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

They're not sensible. They're Republicans.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is just extending the rights the CIA has to private businesses so it's more just leveling the playing field and allowing global Capital to directly do ops instead of needing to use government apparatus to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well you see, it benefits the ultra rich and corrupt politicians while causing more harm to the poor and middle class. What is more sensible than that?

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh, right after they limited the number of houses a corporation can own, they make it legal for a corporation to hide how many houses they own.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This so obviously xenophobic propaganda. As if we don't have our own homegrown shitheels who will abuse this FAR AND AWAY more than the foreigners. This is direct gift to the AMERICAN oligarchs specifically. That is no better for you, the peasant, but it is not foreigners coming here to ruin shit. We are perfectly capable and willing to do it to ourselves it seems.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

xenophobic propaganda

It has nothing to do with xenophobia. You're right, obviously this will benefit all billionaires, especially those under U.S. jurisdiction. But, the reason for calling out Mexican cartels and Russian oligarchs is to never imply that U.S. billionaires are Bad People. It's the same reason they're the only ones who are ever mentioned in this context, to misdirect public ire.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You said it right there, "US" billionaires are good foreign billionaires or other shitbags are bad.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This so obviously xenophobic propaganda.

So you're telling me that messaging can affect people. Interesting, I thought people could just opt out by wanting to real hard! /s

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 12 points 1 day ago

And American mobsters. Of which trump is one.

[–] droniecarp@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago

This is fraud and corruption.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is the part where the senate and congress make themselves completely obsolete by continuing to legalize corruption. Where have I seen this before?

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I was thinking of Rome but your answer isn’t wrong

[–] crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, the illusion of this being a legitimate government is laughable and everyone knows it. Might as well make a new governmental system based on Constitutional rights that's adapted to modern issues in the current system

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We definitely need a constitutional convention at the very least

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 18 points 2 days ago

Biggest American cartel hard at work.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know what...okay. I'd love to have a shell company. Who wants to start scamming magrats? I only need like 12 people to make sure we get liability protections.

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Count me in

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

LOL, Russia oligarchs.

Who do you think bought Donvict and the Repedolicans?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Rich people anywhere. They already have assets five layers deep in shell companies to hide taxes and basically launder money. This just removes yet more ability to engage in oversight.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s a gift to Donald J. Trump and his crooked ass family

load more comments (1 replies)

Time for everyone to setup a shell company since companies have more value than humans

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Not to worry, I'm sure this will be all over the news.

Yep.

Aaaaannny minute now, the billionaire-owned news corps will . . . . will talk about this in depth.

Mmm hmm.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Mf looks like he says 'nyah' unironically.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And, of course, tax evaders.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

It's not a gift to them, that's an unintended consequence. It's for Trump and all his corrupt pedophile friends.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not Congress, MAGAs. There better not be a single Democrat that votes for this.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Incoming "Fetterman was the deciding vote"

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

He's not a dem after his brain damage.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still don't get why the Dems don't just expell his ass from the party, I feel like that's happened before with blatantly shit folks before. Or maybe I'm thinking of Teddy Roosevelts purge of equivalents in the Republicans back in the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Extreme Privacy book author must be celebrating

load more comments
view more: next ›