this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
438 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30175 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) says New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is going to have to smooth things over with congressional Democrats after backing several progressive candidates who ousted incumbents during Tuesday’s primary elections.

Asked if Mamdani’s endorsements were making him “enemies” with Democrats in Washington, D.C., Jeffries told CNN that he and Mamdani “strongly” disagreed over his primary picks ahead of Election Day.

Now, according to Jeffries, the mayor has serious “work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 2 points 2 minutes ago

Hey Jeffy, get fucked.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Mr Jeffries,

I am appalled that you, or any Democrats, think that you get to pick who it is that we, the people, vote for. You are a representative for us. You need to smooth things over with the American people because these others were voted in not because Mamdani is a cult of personality, but because they are doing and saying things the people like and want.

When you and the party can do something successfully, such as codify LGBTQ rights (I.e., gay marriage, trans rights, etc), eliminate corporate government influence, ensure proper health care, and a laundry list of other things then maybe we can take you and your “preferred choices” seriously. Until then, watch change happen from the people that actually have to be in the trenches dealing with all of the American government’s fuckery. Please sit down, kindly shut up, and do your job of representing the people’s needs and not presenting your next potential colleague.

Sincerely,

An American Voter in Illinois

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ah yes the house Democrats known for their fervor, backbone and hard fought results.

You can't even threaten an enemy properly and you are gonna threaten a fellow Democrat? Fuckin traitors. And they would be dealt with accordingly.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It makes more sense when you realize they're just the paid opposition party all these years. It explains all the ratchet effects and lack of real social progress.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

I think it's probably more complicated than that, like sure lots of people in the party end up as paid opposition and certainly the longer they are in Washington making the kinds of compromises they have to make to get anything done the better they get at rationalizing those decisions. But I wholly agree that things need to change from what they are

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

How long did Jeffries wait to endorse Mamdani as the NYC mayoral candidate?

Maybe it stings that Mamdani's successes so far have come despite support from Democrat leadership. Just shows what taking your job as a public servant seriously can do.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 49 minutes ago

no the incumbent dems should be scared, very scared. he just showed the rest of the country how to take them down. It's time to get to work.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Here's hoping the endorsements keep coming and House corpo losers will have to "smooth things over" with Mamdani. Fuck Jeffries.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

Hey Hakeem, tough titties shitbird. Read the room, your time has past.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

If Jeffries is annoyed if you, you probably did something right. If your incumbents are just there to tow the party line, kiss corporate ass, kiss Netanyahu's ass, and give, at most, flaccid resistance to the Republican agenda before bending to their will, they deserve to lose their seats. The few progressives we have need more numbers. I'll happily sacrifice a few milquetoast party dems for progressives with a backbone and an agenda for change.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

The DNC is scared. They see what happened to the old guard Republicans (centrist) they started losing to more right leaning candidates. Now those leaders are gone and we have a crazy right leaning "leadership" in power. The DNC doesn't want that to happen to them as well. Yet, I think it's inevitable, we've swung too far right and there is too much pent up anger for the centrist to keep power.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 3 points 47 minutes ago

They aren't centrists though. They aren't anything really. They are all bought and paid for by Israel.

Why do we send them billions every month? Because it reaches them, they skim off the top, and put much it directly in the pockets of congress. How else do they leave office rich? It's a giant money laundering scheme at our expense.

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Offices – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries https://share.google/xfVTRkNSzUw8irrPN

Call his stupid ass. Email his dumbass. Don't be quiet about this.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago

Don't know if intentional but here's the actual link for people not wanting to click a random Google link

https://jeffries.house.gov/contact/offices/

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 hours ago

Maybe it's Jeffries who has some serious work to do in terms of the conversations that he's going to have with American voters moving forwards.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

Of course he reacts like that he’s Israel’s bitch.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Oh where's that big tent at guys?

Well, its right here in my pants after seeing those awesome primary results.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 33 points 7 hours ago

Oh how fucking adorable that Jeffries thinks Mamdani answers to him.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

This "top democrat" should be ousted too.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 33 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I just wrote letters to both Jeffries and Schumer telling both of them to throw their full support behind the candidates who won or resign

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

bLuE nO mAtTeR wHo

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago

Most likely, it won't do much; a drop in a bucket.

But enough drops can fill a bucket, and enough letters can at least bog down their mail handlers, send a message and hopefully get on their nerves.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Jefferies should shut the fuck. Fall in line, or be made irrelevant.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

He's falling in line with the old guard.

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 hours ago

Fuck any congressional Democrats that are upset they are getting ousted for progressive candidates...you work for us not them

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 307 points 16 hours ago (17 children)
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

She's the new Mr rogers or for us east Tennessee folk... Dolly Parton.

If you stand against Mrs Rachel... You're wrong.

Imho

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago

People against Ms Rachel are akin to that time Mr Rogers had to sue the KKK for impersonating him to spread their hate filled message.

Or when Fox News slandered him. At least the KKK was smart enough (barf) to try to imitate his style for evil. Fox is too dumb even for that.

When you attack the helpers, you're bad.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 203 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

DNC leadership is pathetic. They have the most popular political leader in the country standing right alongside them and they can't even support the guy, all because they lack the spine to tell their Israeli paylords to suck nut. Fucking corpo leech cowards.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›