this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
373 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

12082 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 hour ago

This is what the boomers most fear. Telling, huh?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 12 minutes ago

Toss in freeing Ukraine and stopping China's genocide of the Uyghurs and I know who I'm voting for!

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 8 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

Socialism!

Ooohh. Say it again!

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Another example of the Caduceus being wrongly used instead of the Rod of Asclepius.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 1 hour ago

Fox news is just an online church. Preaching all the hate, gloom & doom. No one is allowed to be happy or have nice things. Fear is the flavor of every day. What a sad, sad cult this is.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 27 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Bro didn't have an icon for Palestine

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Their graphics team is working on an icon of bombs landing on kids probably.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 minutes ago

Faux news doesn't have one already?

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 97 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Oh no! It's... European centrist?! And a rogue Free Palestine with a steel chair from the corner!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Didn’t even get a clip art icon for them.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 32 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

These are a bit too left-leaning for European centrists. Especially the 32-hour-workweek, even in the most "socialist" European countries this is a position only taken by dedicated "leftist" parties.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

In France we have a 35 hours workweek, and our centrists fight that with all their might.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago

My day job is unionized and it's 35 hours per week. 🇨🇦

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 29 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Imagine being so In love with the billionaires that you want less free time

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In the UK I think it averages 37.5 hours for salaried jobs. I haven't looked that up.

[–] ODuffer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I'm in the UK, 35 hours a week, with a compulsory 1 hour lunch break. University life... It's flexible though 08:00-16:00 through 10:00-18:00. As long as you get seven hours in.

[–] captaincoupi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 minutes ago

That’s pretty good, though legislation says they only have to give you a 20 minute break, and only if you work over six hours. Otherwise, 37.5 tends to be standard.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Is it? The average work week in the Netherlands is 30 hours. That is the current status quo, not even what the "left-leaning" parties propose for the future.

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

The average work week in the Netherlands is 30 hours.

It's a skewed bullshit metric though and you can't compare it to most other countries.

It's quite normal here to have one member of a household working 40 hours and the other part-time, for example 20 hours. That's 60 hours of labour for a family and indeed 30 hours on average.

Unfortunately most statistics only include people who actually work, instead of the total potential workforce. So a traditional family where dad works 40 hours and mom stays at home will have a combined total of 40 working hours vs our 60. But because mom doesn't work she is ignored and the family counts toward the average for 40 hours. So they go into the books as hard workers and we are just lazy sobs.

The cherry on top: statistics often cut off around 60-62, while we can't retire until 67+.

Remember: there are lies, damned lies and statistics.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If it's about the same as Germany, then the reason for that is that there are a lot of part time workers, who often don't get enough money to be able to live off it on their own (e.g. married people, single parents who also get government assistance to make up the difference). That's very different from declaring the full-time work week to be only 32 hours.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It's somewhat similar to Germany, yes, though Germany has fewer part-time workers. In Germany (where I also live) the default options are 35 or 40 hours, though it's becoming more common to have options to work less even in "full time" type of jobs.

Anyway, I doubt the "democratic socialists" in the USA want to ban working more than 32 hours, they just want people to have the same option people have in rich European countries.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Anyway, I doubt the “democratic socialists” in the USA want to ban working more than 32 hours

They want 32 hours to be legislated as 'full time' -- meaning that employers legally must pay overtime (1.5x normal wage) for any amount of time worked over 32 hours per week.

This is already the case for 40 hours, but they want to reduce the number to 32.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

If this is what they want, it's really not very well thought through. Employers can just pay the same amount for 40 hours (paying less for the initial 32 and more for the subsequent 8), and employees will have greater incentives to keep their working week at 40 instead of having more flexibility for work-life balance. This would discourage 32-hour work weeks except for those jobs where employers can easily hire more people to compensate for the 8-hour shortfall (and those jobs are very few in number).

In fact, in Europe it's usually the opposite, where overtime is more heavily taxed, so both employers and employees have incentives to keep the work week within sensible hours. In addition, overtime tends to be restricted by collective wage agreements, which, in contrast to the USA, often apply to non-union members.

[–] Doccool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In this case the median would be a lot more interesting than the average. Few do more than 40h (legally) but many do less -> the average always under 40. Similarly, in average men have less than 2 testicles, but >99% have 2.

If the median is 40, then it still means that over half the population have 40h weeks meaning it's the standard.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The median employee in the Netherlands is just barely at the threshold of working full-time (defined as 35 hours or more). Few of those who work full-time cross 40 hours, and part-time can be well below 30; the average comes out to about 30.

Of those working part-time (less than 35 hours), about 12% would like to work more but has no suitable work available, so these are underemployed people working part-time.

Stats

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Damn so scary. It sure would be horrible to have a good job support supporting the environment, while also having healthcare, education and fair wages at my Disposal. And free Palestine at that.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 37 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

My favorite activity for a minute now is to ask people the definitions and differences between socialism and communism. It's entertaining.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago

But you're wasting their time, and yours.

Instead say, "I like this candidate. She wants to tax the rich."

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I once explained some socialism ideas on Reddit. One user called me a communist, another a Nazi. It was a very confusing pair of responses but said more than either would ever know.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because outside of a class room the terms are meaningless.

The PRC is still officially Communist, and has billionaires.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 44 minutes ago

It's not technically communist (yet), but it is support to be socialist ("with Chinese characteristics").

o0o in a similar vein, i like to ask them if they are pro fascism or anti.. reminding them that they really only get to pick one.. and watch them squirm as their programming conflicts

which is hilarious as they generally also couldnt define fascism if their life depended on it

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's like when AOC was gaining popularity so they showed her platform on Fox. Showing all these good things as "bad".

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago

The horror! Won't someone think of the rich who profit from each of these vital services?!

[–] thepig@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Ahhhhhh 😱😱 they forgot about LGBTQ+ rights 🌈🦄 imagine the horrrorr

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Time to never vote for any of these candidates!

I’d say /s but that was literally many, many unironic comments in 2024

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 9 points 3 hours ago

if they had room on the graphic, it'd be there too.. but their racism runs deeper, and just think of all the black and brown people that would benefit from these policies. they don't care that "all" includes all the maga nuts, too, doesn't even register in their minds.. it's just that "those" people.. the "wrong" people.. would get something--anything, is just too much for them to handle.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

OK, that clinches it. I've had a feeling since the first time I saw this graphic that there was some sympathetic background worker at Fox News who purposely made the thing look as appealing as possible. "Culture war" issues are still kneejerk, hot button topics for a lot of that audience.

"None of this actually works because we pay tons of people to convince you we can't try it"

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I find it funny that they couldn't find a pictogram for the last one.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The Palestinian flag emoji exists. 🇵🇸

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

Watermelon emoji

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

They could, but it was overruled at the last minute for being too racist even for Fox.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds good to me, what's the problem? 🥴

[–] ItsMyVault101@piefed.social 8 points 3 hours ago

This is some fat cat problem we are too poor to understand I guess.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Don't tease me with a good time.

load more comments
view more: next ›