this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
141 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

12087 readers
2793 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 24 points 2 hours ago

Let's go Brandon indeed

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 hour ago

So the good news is he got 35 of 'em, the bad news is that it's just 35 of 'em. Hope they'll release him soon.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

While it's indeed fake, the satire was fun. It notes that whenever you see a Let's Go Brandon bumper sticker, it's in regards to this very famous gay porn star. Same with the chants. Those guys were just big fans of gay porn, y'know.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 3 points 56 minutes ago

Man I really wish this wasn't a fake news story...

[–] Hxrmit@thelemmy.club 31 points 2 hours ago

He is the gigachad image

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's gotta be a high score

[–] anachronology@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago

Not quite Zhukov scores, but Patton and Monty would be jealous.

[–] houndeyes@toast.ooo 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Dude looks like Wolfenstein 3D's B.J. Blazkowicz.

[–] ItsMyVault101@piefed.social 7 points 1 hour ago

but this guys B.J. means something different.

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Is it ever appropriate to use an apostrophe to pluralize a word?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

It is not. That was a typo from the satirical website.

[–] houndeyes@toast.ooo 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Is it ever appropriate to use an apostrophe to pluralize a word?

Surprisingly, I stumbled upon exceptions on Wikipedia not too long ago. E.g., pluralizing single letters (Oakland A's) and symbols (#'s).

[–] uberfreeza@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I was wondering about that. I assumed there wasn't exceptions, because those can still be possessive. Oakland A's members or 13's unlucky superstition. I'm not surprised though, because English is a stupid mess of a language.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

I'm not natively English but isn't that always when you could read it wrong without the apostrophe? E.g. it's zoos and bows, but not hos?

Edit: this example doesn't really do much, since you could argue about it's ho's nazi or a nazi's ho, and hoes is probably more correct anyway. I retract myself from this discussion.

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Not quite. No apostrophe usually means plural. With apostrophe means possessive or a contraction (what is to what's). Its/it's is an edge case where the possessive "its" has no apostrophe and contraction "it's" does.

All that being said, native speakers mistype all of these all of the time, so you don't have to worry about it for casual conversation.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nah, but that is how some people view and use it. It doesn't bother me personally if it seems intentional to quicken clarity. It at least makes more sense to me than possession on a name ending in 's', E.G. Bernie Sanders' policies. It breaks down further if the Sanders had a family reunion, what is the Sanderses'? Sanders'? preference for food?

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Afaik it's not just how people use it but what has been agreed upon by the respective rulemakers. I was just commenting on whether it's appropriate though, completely agree it's arbitrary and imperfect.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Gotcha and I agree about it being as clear as mud. Also your English is amazing. Like better than most native speakers

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thank you, so is yours but you might not say that if you weren't a native yourself

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Not native either, but pretty sure apostrophe-s is about ownership whereas just s is about plural. eg.:

"It's a dog's bark."

"The dogs are barking."

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That is definitely the main rule, but i believe there are exceptions. I could be wrong though

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

"Its" vs "it's" is probably the most common mistake in the English language. Apostrophe is used for ownership as well as contraction, BUT contraction supersedes ownership. So its means ownership and it's means it is.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 points 59 minutes ago

Lol they let him get to 35 before doing something 🤣

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Least realistic thing about it is that if there were 35 Neonazis in one place that the cops wouldn't be there too.

[–] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

35‽ Wow, either he was on a super cocaine rampage or the Nazis are bigger pussies than we realized..

My money is on the naizs = pussies