this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
1196 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12196 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tango@piefed.ca 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I must say, this Mamdani fellow seems to be having a lot of success very quickly. One has to wonder why nobody ever tried any of this before. Can it really be that the switch to using Ranked Choice Voting in NY primaries made THAT much of a difference in the type of candidate that made it through?

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Why do you think republicans are trying to make it illegal?

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think, for the longest time, the mayors have just been in on the racket. If you don't ruffle feathers, the rich keep schmoozing you. Just keep your head down.

I think it's always been that "easy"; they just didn't care to do it.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There's a certain type of person who sees politics as a route to personal enrichment. That type is present in both major parties in the US, and probably the minor ones as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

They should embrace that. Yes, it is socialism. Socialism is how you get these good things for the community. Stop treating the word Socialism like it's scary and own it.

[–] jaschen@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Is the fire department socialism? Everyone pays for a service/insurance that 99.9% people might never use, but want to have in case some shit went down. Why does nobody think this is socialism is beyond me.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There are some dumbass libertarians who advocate for privatizing fire fighting because of that

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

A lot of firefighting company actually used to be private, owned and operated by insurance companies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

But liquor is a vice and the old school Christians wanted to crack down on that.

[–] bajabound@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We should ban alcohol nation wide! That'll show them! /s

load more comments (1 replies)

The only godly vices are the abuse of power and children.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 days ago (9 children)

One of the few things I agree with the Christian right on except I think all vices, including all drugs / gambling, should be sold by state run stores. The profit motive and addiction don't mix well

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How could he possibly afford that!?

It's like suddenly there's more money and it's getting distributed /s

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

It's not even more money yet. This is just the same city funds being redistributed to areas where it can be useful.

Meaning ANY Mayor could have done this, they chose not to.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don’t forget Trump’s gas stations which sell gasoline below market rate!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Doubt it. We just don’t know how’s he’s enriching himself with that yet.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (12 children)

PA also has state run liquor stores. I always thought Ohio was the only other state.

Anywhoots, yea I think that is a good thing. And not just because it eases people into seeing how socialism is a good thing.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Utah and Idaho are both state run liquor stores.

Wooo! Someone mentioned my state!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

NH has them too, and it's some of the cheapest prices around. One of the biggest stores is right on the state line because people from MA cross the border to buy booze cheap.

It's also the only place in the area that doesn't have legal pot, and the theory is that lawmakers keep rejecting it until it's federally legal because they want to make tax money on it just like they've done with liquor. Problem is that it doesn't look like the feds are getting on board any time soon, and being the "live free or die" state with the only place with no weed when all the places its border touches have it is kind of embarrassing.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the theory is that lawmakers keep rejecting it until it’s federally legal because they want to make tax money on it just like they’ve done with liquor.

Um... that is really odd. I used to live in Illinois, which has had legal weed for years, and they've been taxing it and raking in the dough all along. In fact, a lot of states with legal weed collect tax on the sale of it.

g7iLzbxUUn8v6xn.png

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah it's pretty stupid. It's like they're not satisfied with just taxing it because they want to be the only game in town. Anyway for such a "libertarian" state it's got some problems.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

the theory is that lawmakers keep rejecting it until it's federally legal because they want to make tax money on it

That makes no sense, because other states tax it when they sell it. If it's legal to be sold in the state, why wouldn't they be able to tax it?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

NC too. At least for a bit longer.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 25 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The next time they call you 'Socialist' ask them to explain how the Homestead Act wasn't Socialism.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Funny how they also don't say a peep about Mitch shit bag basically using our tax money to pay his healthcare... in essence, something we pay for--all while not having to go to work for weeks on end. Something the rest of us would not be privileged to have. Fucking wanker.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Mitch literally pulling a no-call no-show and getting away with it.

[–] Caption@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Don't lots of states operate liquor stores? I know Canada does.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So apparently it's not socialism when you get drunk?

[–] cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How the USSR achieved full communism. Yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Well yeah, it is far enough south to be as hot and humid as Satan's taint for large swaths of time, covered in insects like mosquitoes, and it is filled to the brim with corrupt, hypocritical politicians, and the ignorant masses that keep voting for them.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›