this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
231 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2134 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senior officials deny such a change is in the works, despite guidance shared with agents around the country in recent days.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 74 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Correction: FBI will no longer be investigating ICE instigated confrontations. If you confront ICE, I'll bet they come right back out.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago

If you live that long.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 15 hours ago

Patel’s hands grew tired from constantly scratching words on shell casings of old bullets to plant as “evidence”.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 21 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

So, that leaves it up to the states? No take backsies.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the plan is the have no investigation whatsoever.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They're currently holding up the state's investigations by saying they're doing their own and doing nothing.

Months after the ICE shootings in Minnesota, a federal probe remains elusive

Months after federal immigration agents shot and killed two people and wounded a third in separate incidents during the ICE surge in Minneapolis, the status of the federal investigations into the three shootings remains an open question.

In the case of Alex Pretti, a U.S. citizen killed by Border Patrol agents, the Department of Homeland Security told NPR in a statement that the Justice Department is leading an investigation. The DOJ, however, did not respond to NPR's request for comment.

In the case of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, a Venezuelan immigrant who was shot by an ICE officer and survived, DHS told NPR an internal investigation is underway.

As for Renee Macklin Good, a U.S. citizen killed by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, DHS said in a statement "the matter remains under investigation."

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Generally speaking, "elusive is the correct word here. But this one time, I vote for ""illusive," because they only want to create the illusion that an investigation exists.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 19 hours ago

Under the change, responsibility for investigating cases involving federal immigration officers would likely fall to Homeland Security Investigations, an arm of ICE, effectively leaving the agency to investigate itself, according to guidance circulated among F.B.I. and ICE agents.

It's just a scheme to be even less accountable.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I reported people dressed as ICE taking someone in a parking lot to my state police and they said it's a federal matter. It's as fascist as it gets.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago

That's one instance, we all have to keep trying. It really depends on the state, who's answering the phone and who it gets sent to for it to be handled.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

On the one hand, states do need a kick in the ass to remind them that arresting federal agents for wrongdoing is in fact a good thing. On the other, cops are pretty bad at policing their own internally, let alone other units. Even if they're competent in their attempts to maintain a presence, it will be a massive drain on local resources. I feel like any police presence will need to come with full support of a states attorney general to recoup money spent from fed.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

There are a lot of people out there that aren't current LEO that would love a job where they could investigate and arrest federal agents that have broken the law. Just have them direct the braindead badges

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 21 hours ago

Confiscating evidence and burying it under the Hoover Building, no investigation necessary.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

To be fair you can't expect the FBI to investigate anything fairly given their long history of racism and fascism. Not saying this is good just FBI investigations aren't an answer to anything.

[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Citizens take matters into their own hands then

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

Maybe it's because they're all drunk, smoking, and armed so the ATF has claimed jurisdiction?