this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
574 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30517 readers
2758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] savvie@lemmy.zip 1 points 55 minutes ago (1 children)

Mitch the Glitch , The Final Solution- Part I

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 17 minutes ago

... You wanna know what the Nazis called the concentration camps? Jup, the final solution. So maybe think before you write.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I know, right? I called fifty times to ask if he can still get hard and they hung up on me every time.

EDIT: I have just set everyone up for a lot of rigor mortis jokes, have I not?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I appreciate it

The last thing that mafucker had that was hard is his arteries

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

MITCH MCCONNELL IS DEAD

BECAUSE HES FUCKING DEAD AND US REPUBLICANS ARE CRIMINALS.

MOST OF ALL THE PEDO FELON IN CHIEF

[–] allama@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

This may be a time to put "U.S." I was confused at first.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Yea he's definitely dead.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

And some still says two sides are the same and justify not voting last time. Congrats you did that too

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, he's definitely dead.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago

Let's not jump to conclusions now. He might just be brain dead.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Not only merely dead but really most sincerely dead?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

The most basic question: is he alive

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (6 children)

Serious question: what is stopping Beshear from calling for a special election right now? Like seriously.

“The people of the great state of Kentucky have been without proper representation in the senate for over a month. Since Mitch McConnell has abandoned his post as Senator I am calling a special election for his replacement immediately.”

Make them PROVE he is still alive.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 2 hours ago

Serious question: what is stopping Beshear from calling for a special election right now? Like seriously.

The fact that he's a pussy.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

His future political aspirations.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, call for the election, and make MAGA sue. If they do, they'll have to prove he's alive, and if they can't, then they get to go to prison.

Call their bluff. They're lying, they're ALWAYS lying.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

But we must preserve the future by allowing the nazi takeover at all costs

[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Heather Cox Richardson (historian) talked about this in her politics chat today; she seems to think it's a combination of a) likely legal quagmire b) with no major benefit given congress will soon be out of session and c) turtle holds a couple of really powerful positions, while he's out the republicans are hampered.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

lack of testicular or ovarian fortitude. Some reporter should ask him if his balls are in a jar where we could actually verify that they exist. Lets just put the rumors to rest.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

yes, they dont want to be held to account for lying about it. If he was alive they would 100% just attest to it.

[–] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 3 points 3 hours ago
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

His office released what’s clearly an AI .photon where his wife’s right hand?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think thirty to sixty years old is a good enough range for politicians. No younger and no older.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago

I'd go as far as 70. That way you can have a full career in something, then spend your post-work life in public service fixing the problems you experienced first hand. Especially at the local level.

I'd also say 20 years is the limit as a politician. After that, full pension and a permanent ban on any elected positions, and nothing in the private sector that even remotely resembles lobbying.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Can we please have age limits. Senators shouldn’t be dying of old age in office. You can’t run after the age of 70

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Even for him.

I like him. I don't always agree with him, but I think he's one of the few that really gives a shit and actually walks what he talks and I deeply respect that. I value the perspective that comes with age too. But it's time for age limits, man. It's past time.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I agree even for Bernie. He should be living a chill life of retirement not continuing to deal with... gestures at everything

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

Bernie would end up under contract to some network, and make more in a year than his entire political career, but that's not important to him.

[–] shirasho@feddit.online 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If a senator is absent, their vote should not count. Period. It is not deferred, and nobody can vote on their behalf. It is straight up not counted.

This is what Republicans want for midterm and presidential voting, so why does it not apply to senetors?

This would incentivise them to elect healthy people and quickly replace people who can not do their job.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I want unhealthy people to get elected too! The problem isn't that he's unhealthy, it's that he's cheating. The more we allow delegated voting as a matter of policy, the better represented we'll be.

load more comments
view more: next ›