this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
143 points (98.6% liked)

politics

30517 readers
2992 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CatGPT@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 minutes ago

Need to form militias for when he does

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Is it still a coup d’état if you have already completely changed the government? This is more an effort to solidify the change.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 45 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The man who has already attempted a coup

The man who has proven again and again that he will do just about anything to ensure he doesn't lose the majority he needs to not get impeached

The man who is a known compulsive cheater

The man who tried to call people to "find more votes" for him

The man who blatantly used jerrymandering to secure enough seats to maintain his majority

The man who knows damn well is in the gutters in the polls and who knows will never win the next election if it is fair.

You are asking if he is preparing a coup?

The outcome of the movie Titanic was less predictable than that.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If the voters sit it out again, whadyagonnadoaboutit? Those idiots own every single day of this term.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 2 hours ago

If the voters sit it out again

Supposedly.

I'm not entirely convinced they did last time. The elections are highly compromised.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

We’ve had one coup attempt, yes, but what about second coup? Elevensies?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Yes, he is preparing another coup.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 71 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Actually it was 64, and he won one of them but it didn’t change any results.

…of 64 cases across six swing states brought forward by Trump and his supporters, all were lost except for one in Pennsylvania.

The successful case in Pennsylvania was procedural, not based on fraud, and had too few votes to overturn the state results, according to the report's authors.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2026/07/16/donald-trump-2020-election-challenges/90940438007/

[–] Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Yep

Spew lies about election fraud

Then you can claim fraud - by your opponents regardless of election result

And then dismiss it and stay in power

Thats the plan i would guess

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 45 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheKracken@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Yes. Yes he is.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump's logic falls flat on its face, and even the most dimwitted magat can understand this:

If the US elections are fraudulent, then he won the presidency twice fraudulently.

Also, you'll notice he's not investigating the 2016 or the 2024 elections.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 hours ago

Not quite. They think all elections are rigged against them. When they win, they were popular and strong enough to win despite the rigging. When they lose, the enemy was evil enough to pull it off.

Can't lose logic.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 hours ago

...preparing? We've been living in a post-coup US since January 6 2021.

Remember that time when Trump marched his goons on Capitol Hill to attack the US government, then took over the US government?

Yeah, that's a fucking coup.

It was a stupid and poorly executed coup, but it ultimately led to the results he was after.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

He tried it once already and was allowed to get away with it. So yes, he will try again.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 10 points 3 hours ago

Trump would NEVER try Something like that AGAIN After the HARSH Consequences LAST time! THANK you Merrick Garland!

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 16 points 4 hours ago

We've had one coup, yes, but what of another?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Why there's a question mark in the headline?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Trump preparing a coup? Nah, he'd never do that. Where did you get that idea?

[–] diablomnky@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

I don't think he'd fit in one. They're small cars.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

So does guillotine

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Why is anyone surprised?

Oh, hows that mideast war going? Both of em

[–] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If there is fraud what the hell are troops at a polling station gonna do

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Intimidate voters so they stay away, unless they are part of the cult

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

I attempted a coup last time, I can't say I'm surprised he's trying again.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

We absolutely need to work as a community of devs, QA, PMs, etc to build a FOSS/federated election system to submit electronically at polling places.

No one can submit false ballots. No recounts, no padding numbers. They should tally real-time, and it should support rank-choice voting as an optional ballot (or survey) to really see how candidates do.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Doing it is easy, it's the certification that would be the hardest part.