this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
51 points (98.1% liked)

politics

30615 readers
2220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 40 minutes ago

Drunken fascist bitch’s turn in the barrel.

Everyone who works with trump gets shit on. No Exceptions.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 38 minutes ago

Trump’s pressure on Pirro is extraordinary because prosecutors are obligated to dismiss cases when evidence no longer supports the charge, regardless of the president’s personal belief. Hearn’s attorneys said the reckless “charge first, investigate later” prosecution damaged an innocent man and renewed their demand for an apology.

Sue the fuck out of them, Olympic guy!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Even if the work hadn't been defective, driving a motorcade over it did not help.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 hour ago

I guarantee all the original damage would have occured no matter the quality of the liner. The Presidental limo is north of a 20,000lb vehicle. It has higher ground pressure than a semi truck, and any amount of low speed turning is going to generate a ton of tire scrub because of the special high load wide handling tires they use.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Pirro’s office said newly provided Interior Department records showed contractor Atlantic Industrial Coatings improperly installed the lining

Why would she say that? That's crazy. Are Trump's loyalists turning on him?

Anyway, as if you needed more evidence of his narcissism. The mere idea of him being wrong clearly greatly upsets him.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

She can't lie to court. It's perjury.

It's self interest. She knows she'll go to jail if she lies

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

...and who's going to hold her accountable for that?

She doesn't have to lie, she can just not say that.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago

If she's asked by the court, she needs to respond honestly.

Trump doesn't control the bar association.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They know he's disintegrating, and likely only has a few months before he's rendered incapable of functioning. The contractor was a political crony of Trump's who has little to no influence within the Project 2025 framework, and the blatant injustice of the trial was eroding confidence in the DOJ - which Project 2025 needs to push it's agenda.

Pirro will take Trump's heat for a bit until he forgets about it, and then proceed to implement the rest of Project 2025's goals like a good little soldier. The contractor was an easy sacrifice, and Trump cares more about the public embarrassment than bailing out a crony who made him look a fool on the national stage.

Trump's loyalists aren't turning on him. They're waiting out his dementia while they implement the Project 2025 agenda, and making sure he doesn't completely torch the place before the new boss has a chance to take over.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

You say that like his dimentia is new. He's been deranged for at least a decade.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

I didn't mean to imply that the dementia is new, it's just too evident to hide to even the most dedicated of his followers at this point, and this particular case made it very apparent. The Project 2025 bigwigs just want to get the case out of the news cycle because there's no positive way to spin it, and the more attention Trump gives it, the more damage it does to their plans.

Once its out of the news cycle, he'll forget about it, unless they need another distraction from the Epstein files and decide to remind him.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 16 minutes ago

Kinda like global warming

Been going on for decades, but got really obvious in the last 2 years