this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
332 points (92.8% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

7101 readers
411 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They seem to have deleted the post

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ostrakon@lemmy.world 133 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can understand being frustrated here but how do you not realize how much worse you are making it by making this post?

This is going to happen every once in a while, every recruiter, hiring manager, and HR professional should know that. If it happens a lot it's because your interview process sucks and you are everyone's last resort if better jobs don't pan out. This happens much less frequently to employers people actually want to work for.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

HR people suffer from mini God Complexes.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

All of upper management as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It also happens very often, but in reverse. Company promising things and suddenly just not even calling back/msg back.

I bet those bastards also have several people lining up for their jobs !! /s lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 105 points 1 month ago (5 children)

For those of you who say the employee is in the wrong, fuck off. When jobs take weeks to initiate the first interview, to the sheer number of interviews, to being passed over and getting to the last interview to be told no, there's zero expectation as a hiring manager that the employee hasn't received multiple offers. You hope that your offer is the best and they decide to join. To those also saying this is an inconvenience to the employer, sure, but that's why you go with the 2nd choice and move forward.

I don't know the employment laws where this person was, but where I am, it's a right to work state. I can quit at any time with zero warning. I can also be fired at any time with zero warning. I used to do hiring, and for someone to get so ass hurt that they publicly shamed the candidate is insane.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 20 points 1 month ago

it’s a right to work state. I can quit at any time with zero warning. I can also be fired at any time with zero warning.

IIRC that's at-will employment, right to work is the union busting one.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 16 points 1 month ago

Yea they could have easilly gotten a better offer at the last minute

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm not justifying the tantrum, but Indian law is a bit different in this regard. Usually there is a one or three month notice period. If the worker / company wants to terminate the job, they are expected to inform the other party as many months in advance so they can plan accordingly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I had a friend accept a job and when he showed up the first day they told him that they decided to go with someone else and he doesn't actually have a job and they must have forgotten to tell him. Fucking brutal.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I worked in an office where a guy came in and on his first day he was taking phone calls from recruiters and discussing other job opportunities. He was shown the door on the same day.

The phone was a shared phone on a desk in an open plan office. His boss sat on the same desk.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

lol, either they have huge balls or they're an idiot

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

I live near them and only hear bad things

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

In the US, this isn't illegal, but it is something you can sue an employer over. At-will employment does not apply here.

It's a claim of promissory estopel.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We received information suggesting he may be handling multiple offers simultaneously

Yes that's what can happen when you're looking for a job. Get over yourself.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 24 points 1 month ago

Like every single other company out there, I'm sure they also handled multiple applicants.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally had a company tell me I got the job and to be on the look out for the official offer in my email just to get the rug pulled from under me. That's just tough shit. The company in the post should've given a better offer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

your headline is a lie. "not accepting their offer" is not the same as "accepting their offer then just not showing up". to pretend otherwise is disingenuous.

don't get me wrong, this is a bit unhinged but you're overshadowing a good point by clickbait lying right off the bat.

downvote.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A BIT unhinged? Brother, are corporations so people now that they can crypost on the timeline?

I wouldn’t ever work for this company and I hope more people see this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mika@piefed.ca 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the other hand, all the companies have a "trial period" where they can kick you any day just because.

Why wouldn't an employee apply the same approach?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I live in an ‘at will’ state, this means that either I or my employer can end my employment at any time for any reason. As you can imagine this is both good and wildly abused by employers.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The good part is that the employer is not afraid of hiring someone. I'm from somewhere where employment is a serious commitment - after some time of employment, it's very, very hard to let someone go.

The consequence is that employers are deadly afraid of getting stuck with someone who is not a good worker, basically forever. It means that salaries stay low, because if you raise a salary you can never bring it down again, and you can't get rid of that worker. It also means that some workers just stop giving a fuck as soon as they get "tenure" and can't be let go anymore.

At will employment has a lot of downsides for the worker, but it also means that no one is afraid of hiring and so that you can easily get a job when you need one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's just business. the exchange of labor services for money. nothing personal. I don't get upset on behalf of starbucks when someone goes to Tim Hortons

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

I guess they should try to be a better company to work for then. Nobody would bat an eye if a company did it to a new hire, so fuck em. It's one job, chill out.

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Accenture is a horrible choice but the candidate is better off than if they had stayed with these psychos.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Better than Deloitte or PwC from a culture perspective. But they've been pushing so much offshore in recent years that their reputation is taking a hit (granted, the candidate in this scenario IS that overseas resource). At least it wasn't KPMG

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bruh probation period cuts both ways. Employer was being measured against alternatives and came up short 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 month ago

Omfg they even @ him at his alt profile! Chuds!

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago

I'll bet the candidate hadn't signed shit. Very few jobs did I ever have anythig TO sign or any written confirmation the job was mine before the first day of work. The exceptions mostly involved on-the-clock training on company policy and such, and often the pay and department/position to which I would be assigned would STILL be up-in-the-air at that point; still NOTHING in writing to confirm it, and 99% of jobs you still can't be certain what's locked-in until your first paycheck. Had a couple it turned-out they were paying a lower "training" rate during that time, still lower than any 90-day probationary rate or such that had been mentioned.

In what world are we obligated to that?

The world expects us to show up qualified, and we apply for jobs we qualify for, working x machines, processes, what-have you. These ass-holes will gleefully wast weeks of your time on policy questions then have you sweeping a warehouse and running a fork-lift on the opposite end of the campus for a third of the pay. There are companies that are up-front about this and that's another matter. There are plenty more that just lie and act surprised when called on it.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm surprised this is even news. This is how the India hiring market works. They have 3-month notice periods. And surely during that time they're juggling multiple interviews and job offers.

If that's a problem, hire somewhere else. Or be the best offer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow! Looking at job offers from multiple companies, just like companies look at multiple job-seekers, and then changing his mind at the last moment. How would a mere person have the gall to overstep his station in life like this? Workers were meant to beg for jobs, companies were meant to dole them out. Are there no standards anymore?!!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Accepting an offer, going through onboarding and then not showing up is very unprofessional. The least you can do is give notice. While it's certainly not OK to publicize this and probably illegal in many jurisdictions, the candidate is clearly also in the wrong here.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (15 children)

I personally think capitalism can get bent. A few years ago I would have agreed with you, but companies don't give a shit about you. Why should you be required to give more than they do?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago

I'll agree that companies deserve notice when they decide to start giving two weeks notice before firing someone.

Since that will never happen, this sort of "it's unprofessional" attitude just makes people look like corpo dicksleeves

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

Well, that's a lawsuit.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

That company's website is awe inspiringly bad. A static page does not need a loading bar and the cookie consent banner shouldn't break the whole page on mobile.

load more comments
view more: next ›