this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
997 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30762 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Baby boomers comprised a larger share of voters in 2024, accounting for 32%, but they are trending lower after hitting a peak of 36% in 2016.

Ocasio-Cortez, a millennial herself, expects the younger generation will soon tip the scales in American politics.

“Millennials are not punk kids anymore. We’re grown adults with mortgages and kids,” she said. “And we—that generation is starting to be decisive at the polls. And there is anger at being ignored, sidelined, having our economic futures mortgaged by the generations that came before us on everything from the economy to climate. And we’re taking the reins.”

From global warming to debt crisis to lack of affordable health insurance (all intentional), Boomers have definitely overstayed their welcome.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Every single generation in the past 100 years has said the same thing. "My generation will fix it when we're in charge".

The God Damn boomers were the hippies from the 60s. What the fuck happened to peace and love?

My generation (Gen X), my goodness, we could see through all the bullshit. We're the original centrists.

Every single one of my children's Gen Z friends are all so woke they never sleep.

Turns out every generation is full of selfish shortsighted dumbasses just like the one before it. Just like "The Greatest Generation". Just like the boomers. Just like Gen X.

Faith in humanity...fading

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The people who were hippies in the 60s are mostly still hippies today. Well, the ones who subscribed to the peace and love philosophy at least. Despite the media attention the hippies were never large enough to be a politically influential group in that generation. Most of the boomers grew up bullying the hippies.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Both my boomer parents were hippies. My Mom literally lived in a commune for some time in her early 20s. She voted for the T-Dog in 2016 because she wanted to see real change.

I used to chuckle when I was a kid the way my Dad would look at me and roll his eyes when my grandparents would talk about politics and religion. My Dad loves his MAGA hats now. And wonders why his grandchildren don't want to be around him.

My sample size of 2 says otherwise!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Counter anecdote: my parents are still far left. My mom was a local union rep, still attends protests, and is volunteering today.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gen X got skipped in politics. The boomers refused to cede power, and it's like the Xers largely aged out of entering the political space.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gen X chose to be the "I'm not really into politics" generation. As if electing our leaders was a spectator sport we could just not participate in. And then we all claimed to be too cool for political parties when we started noticing the world was really going to shit. Which is how we got centrists.

I know because that was me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This is not old versus young, plenty of old heads want what the younger gen wants.

This is class warfare. The Epstein class has been attacking the rest of us for ages with impunity. The first strike came from Senator Joe McCarthy in the 1950s.

I appreciate what AOC does in most respects, but this is a miss for her. We can’t afford this divisive messaging and she needs to be told this.

Accountability to the people for ALL politicians.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 22 points 1 day ago

There is no war but the Class War.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except in a way it is old vs young. The old will need more and more care, and that ends up coming from the youth. The same youth that were promised a future that doesn't exist, and now have little desire to give giving what they cannot afford. Many countries are going to have to have a real reckoning with aging populations, and few have even started the conversation.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Young people would not mind providing that care if they were paid for it.

If we soaked the rich to fund the welfare state there wouldn't be so much simmering anger.

Not doctors and lawyers, the billionaires and decimillionaires. The epstein class.

Tax wealth not work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

We’re going to be old one day and need care. Society as a whole takes responsibility for this.

The young need to support the old and in turn, we will be supported when the time comes.

Socialist mentality is about benefit to all, including the elderly. The rich also have it in for the elderly. To them, the death of the boomer generation profits them, because they can come up with more excuses to eliminate social security, thereby screwing us all. They want to saddle us with a privatized retirement system that they control for their own profits.

We also need to fight for ourselves and our own interests.

We can fight for the interests of all, not just our select group.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is not old versus young, plenty of old heads want what the younger gen wants.

She said millennials are getting more politically active...

And you're attacking her because she's divise?

By any chance do you consider the phrase "Black lives matter" divisive and think "all live matter" is better?

Logically that's what you're saying, I just would prefer not to make that assumption, so just trying to clarify.

Edit:

And in the spirit of clarity, this is her quote that you said is divisive:

“Millennials are not punk kids anymore. We’re grown adults with mortgages and kids,” she said. “And we—that generation is starting to be decisive at the polls. And there is anger at being ignored, sidelined, having our economic futures mortgaged by the generations that came before us on everything from the economy to climate. And we’re taking the reins.”

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

She didn't say "boomers", fucking Fortune added that. And they reported this specifically to stir the bogus generational conflict.

AOC should not have mentioned generations at all, she's supposed to be uniting us against the billionaire class, and here she is quoted in a billionaire rag about this. I hope she does better, and soon.

[–] sfgifz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That khumbaya idealist world is not happening. The other side actively weaponizes these conflicts successfully, if you keep pretending they don't exist you alienate everyone.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's some big "all ~~lives~~ generations matter" energy you got there...

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Generational warfare is counterproductive. I have much more in common with a working class boomer, than I do with a rich person who is my same age.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

100% this. So sick of this shit.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 231 points 2 days ago (11 children)

This day and age with a growing positive sentiment toward authoritarianism, anti intellectualism, and fascism, I think some punk would be good. A lot of punk, even.

[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Yea I feel this lol. I've never put dye in my hair but fuck am I considering it lol. Fuck the system and YES I am 32 who CARES we're all BURNING

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

We're also mad about the corruption, industrial scale pedophilia, and the land theft and genocide. Thats not going away. There needs to be paybacks. The guillotines arent for show. We have criminals to round up.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] samsamsamsam@discuss.online 74 points 1 day ago (17 children)

This framing gets it wrong. It isn’t boomers vs. millennials. It isn’t immigrants vs. citizens. It’s ordinary people fighting over a shrinking share while an extraordinarily wealthy few accumulate more money, assets and political power than they could ever need. Stop turning class problems into generational wars. Tax extreme wealth.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I agree that is class war but boomers are enabling the wealthy.

Boomers would rather punish millennials for our avocado toast than see billionaires taxed.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Again, you are falling for their propaganda. "Boomers" wants no such thing, but fascists do. Fascists comes in all ages, including millenials and gen zs. This is not about age, it is about whether you are in the ruling class or not.

It is not generational war, it is class war.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 87 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the price of the average US home was $11,000.00

A Boomer could graduate high school and be living in their own place with no roommates with money they'd earned delivering newspapers.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (26 children)

And depending on their area, that house may sell for a million+ now to millenials who have no other option if they want to live the classic american white picket fence dream

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And there is anger at being ignored

Hey now, being ignored is the Gen X identity, millennials don't get to steal that!

But seriously, although the whole "generation names" stuff is BS, people are influenced by what things are like when they were growing up. People who had access to the Internet when they were kids are naturally going to see the world differently than those who didn't.

It has also been a consistent fact that older voters vote more. So, as "Millennials" get older, they'll probably vote more, like every group does.

older voters vote more often

The real question is whether those votes will matter. I'm not going to claim that there's no difference between democrats and republicans. But, in the past the democrats and republicans that won their primaries were both heavily constrained in what they were allowed to do after taking office by powerful special interest groups. So, a democrat might be more likely to vote for something like more federal funding for the arts, and a republican might be more likely to vote for something like more tax cuts (without lowering spending of course), neither one would likely vote for an increase in the minimum wage because the people who fund their campaigns don't want that to be considered.

This time, it could actually be different. There's enough anger out there that people who aren't owned by the wealthy are surviving the primary process. Some "traditional" democrats are either finding their courage, or are getting scared of what might happen to them if they don't stand for the things their constituents care about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (10 children)

We may not be punk kids anymore but we’re definitely still punk.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah we're middle aged punks now!

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 days ago (7 children)

True to form - Gen X getting skipped over in the discussion again.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Make no mistake, Gen-X is part of the problem.

~And I fully expect to be downvoted for my unpopular opinion.~

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (14 children)

In my experience, the older Gen X are not distinguishable from boomers while the younger Gen X are not distinguishable from millenials.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So, she didn't say "boomer". But she did frame it as a generational issue.

It really has nothing to do with age. In fact that's backwards. It's about people who have been in power too long, and are coincidentally old. They aren't corrupt because they're old, they're corrupt because they're in power, and they're old because they've been in power a long time. Too long. Bernie is rare because he's avoided becoming corrupt, his age is coincidental.

We need term limits for Congress. That won't stop the corruption but it will mitigate the damage they can do, and help prevent them from becoming entrenched and forming damaging long-term alliances with other corrupt politicians and billionaires.

You might say, "voting is the term limit", but voters are notoriously terrible at spotting corruption, and of course, the politicians do everything they can to hide it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a generational issue...

For the entirety of America's recent decline, Boomers have been the largest voting demographic.

They were the ones active in primaries dragging both parties parties right and fucking up almost every aspect of American society.

No one is saying the problem is every single person in that demographic.

But it is 100% that demographics fault. Because they're the ones that spent a literal lifetime voting for it.

The problem isn't just the boomer politicians, it's all the boomer voters who see voting for anyone younger than themselves as a personal insult.

They're openly age discriminating against anyone younger than them, but anytime you get generations attempt to discuss it, boomers crawl out of the fucking woodwork saying "this" is why they can't do the thing we were just saying you can't do

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

She’s not wrong…

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›