this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
444 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

88517 readers
3950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheKracken@lemmy.world 49 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Omfg just talk to your kids and fucking be a parent. It's not that hard. Fucking puritanical shitlords.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 24 points 15 hours ago

These laws have nothing to do with children but on paper..

[–] BrownSugarBits@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The last time I checked, no person under the age of 18 can purchase internet access from an ISP. An adult has to enter a contract before a single byte can be transferred across the internet. All the content you see online was put there by an adult, or the responsibility of an adult. The internet itself is already an age gate.

This shit is like a nightclub sueing the government to have the bus driver check id's

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You can find an open Wi-Fi network

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

FBI surveillance van

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 101 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As we’ve said time and time again: the internet will always route around censorship.

Of course it will. I don’t understand why Utah thinks they can censor content when countries like North Korea and China demonstrate that a circumvention is always found.

[–] iuseasahibtw@ani.social 3 points 13 hours ago

I use VPNs when I'm in China just to download anime, grim.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the original design considerations for what became the internet was that it should be able to automatically route around outages and allow communications to still get through, even if many of its nodes were taken out by nuclear war.

Finding a way to get around blockages is practically what the internet was designed to do.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Believe me, I’m old enough to know that very well. I’m more flabbergasted that state lawmakers in Utah have the audacity to believe they can accomplish what a totalitarian state can’t.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you been to Utah. They started out as a totalitarian state, were forced to integrate, but long to return to their roots.

Honestly, they did not integrate very far. Obligatory fuck Mormonism.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago

EFF to the rescue.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 38 points 1 day ago

More like *that empowers the surveillance state.

Honestly, I have nothing against age restricted spaces (within reason). When a bouncer checks your ID at a bar, they historically haven't been logging that interaction. Its not used to track your movement, reported to your health insurance company, etc...

If you assigned the death penalty to CEOs who store or sell verification information I could maybe be talked into providing my ID to an online company.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is real life now. But also Idiocracy.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's got what plants crave.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Water? Like from the toilet?

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

I ain’t never seen no plant growing out of no toilet

But Jesus told them to pass the law.

/s

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aylo’s lawsuit does not challenge SB 73’s provision prohibiting the websites covered by the law from sharing information about VPNs.

Well, somebody should challenge that as well. Seems like a clear-cut 1st amendment violation to me.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

I think that's why it was pointed out.