this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
217 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

12662 readers
2161 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Consolidate the emotions into lifestyle and you end up with easily manipulated groups to lead for you agendas...

From politics to to subcultures...

It's the reason why everything seems to lose its soul.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

That was when republicans were the progressives and democrats were the conservatives, though.

Before the party flip, it makes little sense to refer to ‘republicans’ and ‘democrats’. Those labels changed, not only in their values, but what the ‘conservative’ and ‘progressive’ platforms even were at that time, since there were different crossover issues than in today’s society.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Mmm it was mid flip. Don't forget that Republicans railed against Social Security that FDR was proposing.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Before the major flip during the Southern Strategy of the 60s/70s, though.

That’s sort of what I meant by crossover issues early on making even ‘conservative’ and ‘progressive’ muddy, even beyond ‘Republican’ and ‘Democratic’ being basically meaningless to our modern ears.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 19 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Yep. Conservatives came to be called that because they were interested in conservation of nature, before it came to describe fiscal policy or religious extremism. the conservatives of today are nothing like them.

[–] berber@feddit.org 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

to my understanding, that is very much not true.

the terminology of being a "conservative" did not come from supporting conservation of nature. that might be one aspect, and indeed, still today, there are conservatives that are very much interested in the conservation of nature, but this is not where it came from. it came from schools of thought in the american and french revolution concerning conservation of aspects of tradition, aristocracy, royalty, and religion.

afaik, this has also been the case tbroughout american history as well. perhaps you are referring to people like teddy roosevelt, who identified as a conservative to the public and had conservationist views and policies.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

to my understanding, that is very much not true.

You say it's not true, but then you describe a time during which the word was used in a different way, as more of an adjective or categorization than to name a party defined by that category. I stand by what I said.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Many "conservatives" of today shouldn't be called that imho, it's more like they are progressive but in a different direction

[–] plateee@piefed.social 12 points 1 hour ago

Regressives?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 58 minutes ago

They’re just reactionaries

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Ho ho! There's at least 5 millionaires here, judging by the downvotes!

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yea, google the southern strategy, racist fucknutz from the south took over the GOP and the parties flipped with the former GOP politicians becoming Democrats

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That happened after the Nixon presidency.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It started in the 50s, ironically because the GOP couldn’t make gains in the south, so they started to appeal to southern white racists to get their vote. It wasn’t a quick thing

Quick edit, I should say its roots started in the 50s. Nothing of which belays the point that the GOP that freed the slaves is the same GOP that likes to say they are the party of Lincoln

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 25 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Many Eisenhower voters became Democrats when the GOP took a hard right in the late 60s/early 70s.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago

If they want to be the party of Lincoln they also have to be the party of Eisenhower.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Was it the 60's when there was the parties flipped? I always thought it was the 20's/30's with Hoover and FDR?

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There have been multiple realignments, the relevant one there was Nixon and the Southern Strategy.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't suppose you can point to a comprehensive list of the realignments?

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Comprehensive? Lord no, but Wikipedia does have a decent enough list here.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Looks pretty comprehensive to me. Appreciate it!

Though the "Other possible political realignments" section feels a little liberal in its definition of "realignments", what with approximately every other election since 1964 being labeled as a realignment.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

That's kinda why I called it not comprehensive, it seems a bit too inclusive for me to think that word quite applies.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The flip was with FDR, but between 60s-80s they defined what the modern Republican is.

I always like to refer to this site and its infographic - https://kathleenkowal.com/blog/history-of-political-parties-in-the-us

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 53 minutes ago

I've seen similar before, but it's a good broad view of how things moved around. It wasn't a flip in the 60s, but a migration of the Dixiecrats (Civil Rights was just too far for them) and dying off of the more liberal side of the Republicans, so those voters scattered, some coming to the Democrat side since that's where support for things like social programs went.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

The last good Republican president.