Wasting resources to persecute a tiny minority of people who barely make up a portion of the population, is always a waste and has always been fascist MO. Nazi Germany's Holocaust and massacre of Slavs was a waste of time resources as well. Those millions killed by the Nazis could have been useful to actually fight Bolshevism if they really wanted it. The Ukrainians welcomed the Germans as liberators when they invaded. But what did the Germans do? Killed the Ukrainians. Of course, this only made the Bolsheviks only seem less of a bad guy for the Ukrainians, which made the latter welcome back the Soviets.
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
178 points (98.9% liked)
politics
31430 readers
2522 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Silly propagandists, they have failed to link Trans people to high prices.
I have a theory about this.
So we know the world is kind of sort of run by wealthy rapists who control the media and try to influence culture to normalize SA and the objectification of women.
I think those same people are the primary group that doesn’t want trans people to exist.
I think rapists enjoy thinking of womanhood as an affliction, not a choice. It makes their mentality more comfortable.
That view is twisted and inaccurate, because consent matters and gender dysphoria is not a choice… but I never said they were intelligent.
Trans people threaten the mentality of rapists.
Idk it's literally all my republican coworkers talk about, im not in texas tho
It goes without saying that he would be 100% on board if it did work.
These pricks don't care about right and wrong, they only crave power; he's only upset that jingling keys in front of reactionary voters isn't as successful when people are 20% poorer than last cycle.
I was always wondering why they had such an emphasis on this not problem. I understand that some backwards people are uncomfortable with the idea, because it vastly exceeds the limits of their minds, but would any woman actually notice when a transgender woman was sitting in the next toilet stall? Has any transgender woman in sport actually made a noticable difference there, at least at the top?
They're not trying to invoke the boogyman of the transgender woman quietly using the restroom, they're trying to invoke the fear of a man hiding in plain sight in the restroom ready to rape your children the second they're alone with the child.
Ahh, they are projecting.
Pretty much always!
Meanwhile centrist Democrats were certain Kamala Harris lost because she wasn't anti-trans enough and the future of the party was piling onto bathroom and sports bans.
They were?
Not gonna read all of them, but I see it saying "some". Also, what I've read from the first one seems like it's the 80/20 thing again.
Yes, some. That's why I said "centrist Democrats", not just "Democrats".
Yes. Some Democrats are just as much our enemy as Republicans. Not everyone running under the D label is actually a Democrat.
At some point, maybe you'll recognize the party itself is the problem, and the good democrats are bound to serve the party by backtracking on their positions and dragging their supporters right with them.
The democrat party is a capitalist neo-liberal fascist party, they're just not open about it and like to cosplay as opposition.
The rich have a long list of other marginalized people they will con stupid people into hating as a smokescreen for them to raid this countries treasury and future.
Who do you think will be the next scapegoat? I hope it's people that wear sandals and socks.
Good. Most normal American don't GAF about all this. Most of us are like...um, trans rights are human rights, no shit, time to move on.
It's not normal for people with no skin in the game to constantly obsess endlessly about another group like the trans. The type of person that does just comes off like gigantic losers and so very unserious.
Relentlessly attacks the rights of subset of US citizens.
Criticized for 'not resonating'.
"Yo Hittler, could you ease up on the whole murdering Jewish people thing? The rest of the globe isn't really vibing with it."
He's criticizing the target, not the tactic. Maybe something more racist since his constituents have actually seen and been scared of a black person.
Classic fascist playback. Blame an outsider to distract.....that's us, folks! falling for it since...well forever.
I would venture a guess that the Republican base for the most part hasn't encountered a trans person, but they have encountered $120+ refueling of their giant monster trucks and grocery bills being twice what they were 10 years ago. But hey those 1% raises at work make them grateful to have a job. Sure is surprising their message is resonating.
Then again, only one tepublican is saying it, probably to see the respone.
One former Republican. I was so shocked to see it until I saw he wasn't in office any longer.
I wasn't anti-trans but then Ken Paxton sent seven (yes, literally 7) mailers about how Talafreako likes them and now I hate them!
Their rabid hatred knows no bounds. I doubt they care if it resonates, they're drunk on that sweet, sweet hate dopamine.