this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
749 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31754 readers
4287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I love Wonkette, and this was a fun read:

Looks Like Pete Hegseth Is Cooked, One Way Or Another

https://www.wonkette.com/p/looks-like-pete-hegseth-is-cooked

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago

Unfortunately impeachment requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate to be meaningful, which still is very unlikely.

More likely the Trump admin will try to use Hegseth as a scapegoat and fire and replace him.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh no how unfortunate for the head of the Department Of Warcrimes.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like fortunate. Imagine the level of chaos the US Army must have been thrown into with this level of incompetence at the head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 252 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Any standard below imprisonment is unacceptable

[–] CoconutLove@lemmy.today 138 points 2 days ago (22 children)

The guy is responsible for bombing a school and killing 150 young girls. We execute people for less in the US.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

not if the victims are brown...

Still hope this shitheels catches a bullet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's the boats that will get him. I think they ended up killing several hundred at random. Iran was a war-not-a-war so that may give him some cover as a failure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Also he denied vets treatment or help since the Iran war is not a war.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (26 children)

Televised execution?

Jk, I never want that.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Televised execution?

We kinda got that last night at the polls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If I hear one fucking word about putting the past behind me and moving on together as a country, I am starting a fucking riot and burning the DNC office to the ground.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Moving on as a country does include accounting for the past. You can't just ignore it. Germany didn't pretend nothing happened, they changed who they were as a country and made sure it could never happen again.

If you don't do that, you're not moving on, you're staying where you are and risking a repeat.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jeffries and Schumer just love to roll over and show their bellies. It's like they both have a submissive kink. Neither should be put in charge of leading Congress.

Hell neither should be trusted with greeting at walmart.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Send this goddamned traitor to the Hague, in the same shackled, blindfolded and gagged getup as all the Guantanamo Bay prisoners he oversaw.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (13 children)

That will never happen. The US policy is that if any US citizen is forcibly brought before the Hague the US would raid the Hague and reclaim their citizen. The only judicial system the us recognizes is it's own.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Then change the goddamned policy.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

yipeee hooo * slooice *

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 88 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Most of the cabinet is looking at jail time I think

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Trump would just pardon them. You'll have to wait until Ds win in Presidential election.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The only limit the US Constitution puts on the President's pardon power is that it cannot be used in cases of impeachment.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 23 points 1 day ago

And as we know, the US Constitution sure has stopped them doing whatever they want.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He needs to be turned over to the Hague as well. The only people who want to keep the U.S. out of the ICC are conservatives. The opinions of conservatives are valueless.

We need to turn these international criminals over to the international authorities.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Ol' Stinky Pete will be rolling in testosterone from all of those beefy, manly cellmates.

[–] saaaaagard@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Do we really think the shitty Dems like Jeffries and Schumer are actually gonna convict these people? They're already walking back actually going after anyone. It'll all be weasel words and "reconciliation."

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Dems likely to get 56 senate seats. need 67 votes to impeach any rat fucker. Needs too many Rs to play "Susan Collins deliberating" role for attention that just drags out.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well technically impeachment is just half the house, is just that impeachment doea not mean anything on its own.

Had a conversation today speculating that there is a non zero chance Republicans could decide to go with some convictions. Throwing a few of this administration under the bus might be seen as more strategically valuable to salvage the wreckage of their reputation. Patel, Hegseth, Miller, RFK Jr all seem to be ripe for some populist scapegoating. Hell maybe even the big man himself, though they might be betting on a cardiac event or similar to do it for them.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

God, get rid of Miller. He's the center of this shitstorm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

There is a very high chance he gets removed. Losing a rushed war with bad advice given to Trump is bad enough. There is no actual escalation of war options, because the funding requests to replenish existing depletions/losses can't get justified to congress, and lying that escalation is affordable is not possible when the defeat so far is already unaffordable.

There is a funding request that passed the house, and is stalled in Senate, that would give Hegseth "national security" magic word authority to spend unlimited amounts. That is an even higher priority to defeat.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

Didn't this guy and the pedo in chief gut all the intelligent military people so the military would be more loyal? Kind of like Russia has done while under Putin?

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 29 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Conviction and removal in the Senate requires a two-thirds supermajority. With a full Senate of 100 members, this means 67 votes.

The dems don't have 67, not even close.

This article is complete bullshit

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Even the Republicans hate what is happening in Iran. Bring in some sailors from the Lincoln to really hammer the point for those conservatives who don't care about foreigner deaths.

It's worth pursuing regardless if only to point at the complicit GOP.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I think there's going to be a surprising amount of Republicans who will come out as anti-Trump but were too afraid to do so while MAGA was in power. There are most definitely traditional conservatives who hate him.

I'm not gonna get my hopes up for too much, we're not gonna fix this in two years. But you never know.

[–] clanker_victim_555@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›