this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
896 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31754 readers
4745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] likebudda@reddthat.com 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL. LMAO even. This was me 6 months ago too when people talked about flipping the senate though so WTF do I know?

Get active. Call your reps. Tell them what you want, call them every time legislation comes up. If they wont vote the way you want you vote in the next primary for someone else. You keep demanding better representatives until, and i cant make this any more clear, until you die because they will never be good enough.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

jfc, I'm generally a negative person and doomsday but the comments here are next level.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately reality is pretty doomy.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

people are pattern seeking beings

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago

It's been around two decades since the majority have had any sense of representation in congress, regardless of who has held what positions; and given what Schumer and Jefferies have openly said, there is no reason to believe this 'blue wave' will bring about anything positive besides delaying the republicans by two years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I actually thought about this the moment I saw all the state wins. Everyone around me completely fixated on Congress and forgot how important state politics are.

I'm glad to see a little validation, although these people still don't seem to care even after I tell them that! Lol

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Uh huh and I betttt they'll do it

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dont fucking dare tease me with this shit.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

No one wants to acknowledge this, but if we all contacted our (non-Republican) representatives every day, this would happen. Public pressure works.

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'll bring you back down then. It won't end the EC, it's a voluntary compact between mostly already blue states agreeing to give their votes to the person that wins the popular vote.

The EC will still exist, and this could, for example, get a Republican elected just as easily. Trump won the popular vote in 2024.

I think it's probably a good idea overall but it has a lot of problems inherent to its process and enforcement.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They had votes before but Nevada DNC liked all of political spending over it being a swing state.

Texas could join now, instead of looking at old 2020 coalition.

  1. DNC is an Israel first outcome, and fundraising driven, instead of having a winning mission. Ken Martin is better than past, but still.
  2. Political class has more power at 50.1% voting differences, and at regional level, more than half the candidates are overrepresented vs underrepresented to their population ratios.
  3. Another proposal that would satisfy some of these "power" concerns is doubling the size of house. It doubles political opportunities for incumbents.

We cannot have UBI, because UBI distributes power away from politicians who are left with less discretionary budgets and power to "steal" cash away from citizens through boondoggles. Similar power balance calculus happens with proposals like this.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Texas could join now, instead of looking at old 2020 coalition.

They still have a Republican state Senate looks like.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org 1 points 21 hours ago

Finally, some good news

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'd be nice if Dems had enough fight in 'em to do something like this but they've consistently shown the opposite.

[–] Ajdee6@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They would rather play nice with republicans

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (11 children)

We cannot guarantee any progressive legislation until the fascists in SCOUTS are either removed or the court is stacked with progressives

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

No reason not to try. Keep the fascists on the defensive.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

This isn't a federal law, these are State laws, and the Constitution very clearly gives electoral power to the States. So much that even this extremely partison ratfucking SCOTUS has avoided taking related cases.

The only issue with the Compact, as pointed out in the article, is that the US Constitution also says States cannot enter into an inter-state Compact without Congressional approval. So they're at odds with each other. However, that would only require a basic approval by the House and Senate, it doesn't involve the President at all. Still some big hurdles, but not nearly as many as two days ago.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aetheplace@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

If you care about this issue (or others like affordability or investigations into corruption), try to talk to them/their staff about it in person. With enough voices doing so, it's harder to ignore.

Here's an example containing information on how to do so, if you're invested in doing something and not just posting online about it: https://www.thoughtco.com/meeting-with-your-members-of-congress-3322076

It also shows how to write to them if that's all that can be managed. Encourage others to do the same and respectfully hold them accountable to their mission statements. They may have been voted in, but they need to hear from their constituents to learn more about why.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now to see if they'll actually follow through

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Narrator: They didn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I am sure they'll do it. Just, how much ya want to bet a Republican undoes it the next time they take over a state that's a part of it?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›