this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
581 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25422 readers
2349 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The arrested man identified himself as a combat veteran and said he was burning the American flag in protest of an executive order Trump signed Monday targeting flag burning.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Good for these people, make them charge you, make them have a grand jury charge you.

A grand jury won't bring charges on sandwich guy and they won't on this either.

The fucking boy scouts burn flags, American flags.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Burn the Confederate flag.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Y'all want to burn some flags in DC this Monday? I'm game

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's not illegal to burn the flag. Any flag.

[–] SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca 17 points 20 hours ago

And executive orders are not laws.

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More confederates should have had their heads blown off instead of lukewarm acceptance back into the union

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some say that the war would have lasted longer and guerrilla campaigns continues and more martyrs... but I say fuck em' hard. That type of shit deserves nothing. All the plantations should have been split snd given to armed black farmers that are under federal protection with extremely stringent gun control on the south for a few decades to prevent an uprising.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

The Radical Republicans wanted to put General Sherman in charge of Reconstruction. That would have been cool.

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 108 points 2 days ago (12 children)

How can you make an executive order like that? That’s not exactly an order.

That would need to be a law, passed by Congress.

This dude has gone so fucking nuts with executive orders left and right out the ass, that no one is even asking wtf? It’s not supposed to be the magical “I can do anything” card. But everyone is ok with this I guess…

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

It doesn't matter, Trump can legally do whatever he wants, he's a king. 1/3rd of the population of America believes that Trump can rule unilaterally. The other 2/3rds are scared of the first and they should be. Trump and MAGA have the executive branch, the judicial branch, the legislative branch, the armed forces, law enforcement, immigration enforcement, and wall street in their side. They only group not on Trump's side is the general public and it should be pretty obvious now that he doesn't have any use for the general public. Trump won. He's king of The United States of America, I suggest you start to think about what you're going to do about it.

Yeah, you know, except the general public does all the things that keep the country working.

Not saying a nationwide strike is easy, or even doable, but a week of that would have Wall Street power brokers contacting mercenary outfits for pricing on a presidential assassination.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 37 points 2 days ago

Both congress and the Supreme Court handed ceded all their power to the executive branch. We have a dictator now, full stop. This country is run by the whims of a pedophile protecting (at best), rapist, criminal (convicted, not punished - REWARDED).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where can I contribute to the legal fund?

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guy was already released actually

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

The wrongful arrest lawsuit is just as important. It needs to be highlighted that Executive Orders do not create arrestable lawsuit.

[–] Guyonthecouc@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Y’all know this is just so they can replay clips of their “opposition” burning flags on Fox News. To vilify more people is the only goal here.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Funny. I can’t wait to fight a civil war against Fox News viewers. So we can be done with their genes. Not like the Jazzy militia will have any capabilities.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trunp and Magats are such effing snowflakes they need a safe space.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Like prison?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 120 points 2 days ago (10 children)

That was fast, good on that guy. Will this be a watershed moment when his infernal majesty's decrees are challenged?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If he was burning a book, the fascist cops would have joined-in

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's such a stupid executive order because the only difference between so called desecration and retiring a flag is the your intentions in how you are setting the flag on fire

people should start holding solemn ceremonies to retire flags via fire in public and see how that goes as well

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Many U.S. veterans I know support the right of freedom of expression, to include flag burning. They say they feel its disrespectful but its the right they bleed for, for people to express themselves

I remember a case where this singer burnt an american flag in protest (I think korean war) and the president was grilled on his take on the matter and he daid that whats beautiful about our country, that we can do these things, and that im the countries we are fighting agianst thier citizens dont have the same freedoms as americans.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›