this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
799 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The leopards! They hunger!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Both sides.

BOOoOoTh SiIiiiiIIiiiiiiDESssssssssSsS!!

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Biden is old, you see, and there was also a woman who wasn't exactly adamant about Israel, so you have to starve now. But don't worry, if you starve enough, something will surely happen. And if not, at least there will be a civil war, isn't that great? You get to die in a random shootout, isn't that wonderful? So glad we didn't vote so this lady didn't win.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (5 children)

True, but as for the last part -

we didn’t vote

We actually did. The even more depressing reality is the last three presidential elections had the highest turnout of registered voters and young voters in American history.

What's fucked up is that exit polling showed that most people were entirely tuned-out and saw no difference between the candidates because most people don't watch the news or politics, most people are uninformed on basic science and reason, most people have curated social media feeds that push attention-span erosion and right-wing propaganda, and a good QUARTER of the adult population of America is functionally illiterate. Meaning studies have shown that 22% or more of adults in the US cannot read more than a couple words strung together or have to piece together sentences contextually. They can work, they can answer text messages, but are incapable of assembling paragraphs and forming complex abstractions.

We're fucked on a level that is hard to convey.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

SNAP has traditionally been entirely federally funded, but is administered by states. That means the shutdown's impact on SNAP and when benefits will start to dry up will vary state by state.

So about those government contracts for immigration, you would think some of those states that raked in a lot of money, could perhaps use that ill-gotten money to at least benefit the residents of their states.

Funny that Florida got more than half a billion dollars from the government the day before the shutdown, but they just can't find it within their hearts or their budget to use any of that money to feed families relying on food stamps in their state. Wonder where it's going instead?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A revolution welcomed by an administration to enact the final coup d’etat.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe, but that really relies on him having the support of his generals. Given that they aren't even being paid, his generals not supporting the administration, and the overall oath being to the Constitution rather than a person, I don't think the military would support a coup attempt.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

He’s spent $70 million on ICE to stockpile weapons of all sorts.. He doesn’t need the Generals, and if stereotypes of what we have in the military are correct, they’re right wingers or interested in preserving their paychecks and positions, so they’ll be active supporters or just let it happen. I think getting any of them to engage in organized military action to preserve the constitution against trump is less than a 20% chance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago

Take that, Canonical!

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This will destroy the US economy. I hope you like standing in bread lines...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

this is a disaster for the people affected (and also every society is 3 days without food before violent revolutions and all that) but also IMO these programs should ideally be paid for by the states anyways, not the federal government. i also think that taxes should go to the states instead of the federal government, and the states then forward whatever amount is appropriate to the federal government. that would make the states more resilient against these kinds of federal fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you haven't looked into contributing to a community garden already, you absolutely should.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

thisisfine.jpg

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›