Kirk

There's no author, and a source isn't mentioned anywhere.

If that information is missing it's either AI or it means OP stole it without crediting which is even worse.

I want a blocklist of every community that allows AI slop and every user that has posted it.

we really need an "ai critics" community that's better moderated

Immich actually uses machine learning to sort photos too

Honestly the fact that Bitcoin is still going despite having no connection to anything physical genuinely makes me wonder about how connected these stock prices are to reality.

He's so dramatic with his language that I assumed he was fudging the facts a little, but the more I've looked into it myself I'm realizing he's honest he's just really dramatic about it.

What's happened to Facebook should make it clear that these platforms don't care what the content is as long as the advertisers will still pay.

Correct me if I'm wrong but what you're describing still sounds like a probabilistic output, right? Meaning it's not the same output every time (meaning it can't actually be doing math).

Someone here said that LLM chatbots are always "hallucinating" and it stuck with me. They happen to be correct a lot of the time but they are always making stuff up. That's what they do that's how they work.

"What was the person wearing when GPT gave them sightseeing suggestions?"

I think it's important not to victim blame here. These people were lied to, by the bots, and by the companies that say the bots are trustworthy. Their government that permits the false advertising is failing them.