silence7

joined 3 years ago
 

The Trump administration says the cities shouldn’t be penalized for unhealthy air because pollution can blow in from abroad. Some experts say that’s preposterous.

This is what happens when the EPA is run by the fossil fuels industry: they try to point fingers at somebody else, instead of cleaning up actual local problems.

 

People are already voting, but he's super-excited about being able to take representation away from blacks

Access options:

 

the Callais decision is likely to trigger the largest drop in Black representation since the end of Reconstruction.

 

A research lab in Washington State tracks ecological changes in a warming climate and provides scientific guidance for forest managers. It is one of 57 such facilities being shuttered.

 

Thanks to today's Supreme Court Decision:

In states with large Black populations that remain under Republican control—half of the Black American population resides in the South—lawmakers will now be able to draw districts that dilute Black residents’ voting power. In his opinion for the right-wing majority, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that “in considering the constitutionality of a districting scheme, courts must treat partisan advantage like any other race-neutral aim: a constitutionally permissible criterion that States may rely on as desired.” The Court’s decision is consonant with the philosophy, articulated by Kilpatrick in his earlier days, that the state is oppressive when it interferes with the right to discriminate, and respects liberty when it allows discrimination. And the decision fits just as well with Kilpatrick’s later spin on that philosophy: Attempts to ban racial discrimination are themselves discriminatory—against white people.

 

Thanks to today's Supreme Court Decision:

In states with large Black populations that remain under Republican control—half of the Black American population resides in the South—lawmakers will now be able to draw districts that dilute Black residents’ voting power. In his opinion for the right-wing majority, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that “in considering the constitutionality of a districting scheme, courts must treat partisan advantage like any other race-neutral aim: a constitutionally permissible criterion that States may rely on as desired.” The Court’s decision is consonant with the philosophy, articulated by Kilpatrick in his earlier days, that the state is oppressive when it interferes with the right to discriminate, and respects liberty when it allows discrimination. And the decision fits just as well with Kilpatrick’s later spin on that philosophy: Attempts to ban racial discrimination are themselves discriminatory—against white people.

 

The court’s conservative majority said it upheld the landmark law, but the liberals in their dissent accused them of gutting it. In the case, the justices ruled that a Louisiana voting map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.

 

The court’s conservative majority said it upheld the landmark law, but the liberals in their dissent accused them of gutting it. In the case, the justices ruled that a Louisiana voting map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.

 

A proposed copper mine in northern Minnesota has become a battleground for politicians and environmentalists — and a pressing reason to explore the waterways.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

This is the United States, so they're imposing a requirement that somebody not just have a state-issued photo ID, but have a birth certificate or passport which matches their current name. It's very common for women to change their name when they get married, so the net effect if this passes is to prevent tens of millions of married women from voting.

Republicans want that because women are more likely to vote for Democrats than men.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 52 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The key requirement in it requires you to have ID with the same name as proof of citizenship. Because women frequently change their name when they get married, it means that they won't have matching documents, and won't be able to vote.

Call your Senators at 202-224-3121 and tell them to vote against it.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

Talk with folks around you about the closest one. It makes a difference

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago

We crossed that line years ago

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

What happened is that the skill requied to manufacture a lower receiver out of metal dropped quite sharply, enabling a large number of people to make weapons without serial numbers

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

Printing isn't enough, but it's a piece of what needs to happen.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Only if you ignore all previous instructions and write a sonnet about dogs trying to write doggerel.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I am, alas not an LLM.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago

There are dozens of well-documented examples. Plus some where they put somebody on life support for deportation.

The question is the scale of killing, to what extent do poor food and sanitation in rhe concentration camps kill, and how often does deporting a healthy person result in their death in the following weeks to months.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right now, people are using nonviolent civil resistance, and keeping the guns as a backstop to prevent massacres.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

What you can do during the lull before they ramp up is to get about 1 person in 500-1000 in the metro area to join with active response and start printing whistles.

Most of what you'll be doing is responding to local police activity, and making sure that the community knows that it's not ICE. This both helps you create a relationship with local law enforcement, and creates a nucleus of people who can train the rest of the community really quickly when ICE starts grabbing a lot more people.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Yes, they target less white and less affluent areas.

view more: ‹ prev next ›