this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29582 readers
1747 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

People are already voting, but he's super-excited about being able to take representation away from blacks

Access options:

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] retsnom513@kbin.earth 27 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

What's amazing to me is how fast they blocked the elections because the maps were found "illegal". The state of Ohio's Supreme Court found their election maps illegal multiple times and the legislator delayed until they said "Oh well too close to the election now ¯_(ツ)_/¯". But now like 3 days before Louisiana's elections suddenly they gotta shut it all down to fix such an injustice..

What a racket.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 43 minutes ago

But now like 3 days before Louisiana’s elections suddenly they gotta shut it all down

The GOP is staring down the pipe of a landslide election in 2026, so they gotta sandbag every seat they can.

Liberals would logically respond by gerrymandering in-kind, as they've done in Virginia and started doing in California. But the innate "bring a sternly worded letter to a gun fight" reflexes of the American democrat continues to drag out any response until well past the point at which they've conceded the next election.

This is going to be 2018 all over again. A bunch of excitement about a landslide that ends with a slew of concessions to Moderate Republicans. Democrats screaming "Vote Blue No Matter Who" at anyone who balks at the Henry Cuellar Re-election Campaign, then politely lining up behind John Fetterman for Senate Majority Leader once the polls close.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

It is a bit crazy. Does an election with illegal maps count? Can it be challenged in court?
It sounds like (and I could be wrong) that the map they have been using for at least one cycle has been found illegal. So what happens to the people elected by that map? Can the loser from before sue now? Feels like the court should have given some direction on what to do here.

[–] thebasementcakes@leminal.space 22 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Alito says racism is over, as republican governors trip over themselves to remove black voters from having an impact

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 48 minutes ago

They're not sure if freeing the slaves was a good idea. They'll re-visit that ruling.

THAT should distract from the Epstein files.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

If Landry suspends the House primaries but not other contests, primary voters would have to go to the polls twice, just weeks or months apart from each other.

That by itself blatantly favors Republicans, let alone every other aspect of it.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 4 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

republicans and election interference, name a more iconic duo

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

Republicans and pedophilia?

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 38 minutes ago

Shit, I stand corrected