silence7

Far easier said than done when its full of heavily armed Men who support the management and have the support of most police

That would mean owning up to a bit of history

Yeah, this is how Putin rose to power — he used selective prosecution of rivals to clear his way to the top

When you start talking about specifics, or advocating that people do it, yes, that gets a short term ban. Don't incriminate yourself in public.

Generic unlikely to be acted on, not so much.

Hungry people dont wait for lawsuits. They just cook whatever meat is at hand

There is basically no chance they'll be able to amend the constitution, which is what that requires

It doesnt have to be fair; just not so unfair that Democrats can't win a whole lot more seats. That's very possible still.

Remember here: states run elections, not the federal government. So you get different gerrymandering and different voter suppression measures in each state

Not today, or next week, but its very much in the realm of what could happen when Democrats hold power again. Why? Because its become clear that ICE, Border Patrol, and much of the DHS see their goal as being to kill Democrats rather than serve the country.

Because the minority party doesnt have the power to do that

They probably dont have access to the gun, brass, or maybe even bullets lodged in the victim or vehicle. Those, along with crime scene photographs, would usually be presented at trial.

Jonathan Ross took off right after the shooting. Actually putting him in prison means locating his lair and actually arresting him, which may be difficult if a ton of armed feds are there protecting him.

This claims to be it: https://bsky.app/profile/victinibcn.bsky.social/post/3mbvwu3y6zs2x