this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1055 points (98.8% liked)

me_irl

7631 readers
3477 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The neat part about fractional banking is that the bank is allowed to just "create" money out of thin air and issue the debt to you. They don't have to have the money to issue the mortgage. They don't care that your debt is "risky" because investment banking is really just run off of vibes at this point.

Historically and today, discrimination has been a big factor in who gets approved for mortgages.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The entire concept of risk that not explicitly based on the individual, like extrapolating from population data, is discriminatory to the individual

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how fractional banking works. You're confusing the economic concept of money supply with outright fraud.

They don't "create" money. Someone deposits $100. They take $80 or $90 of that and use it to make loans. This increases the overall supply of money in the economy. But there's no printing press in the back office turning out notes. And they don't do the same thing digitally. The only bank that's allowed to literally poof money into existence is the Federal Reserve.

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 7 points 14 hours ago

Couple problems with that.

Zero reserve banking has been allowed since 2020 (US). Banks are not required to have any cash reserves in order to make loans.

Fractional reserve banking does not mean that no money is created out of thin air when making a loan, but that not all of it is.

Actual empirical evidence and bank records support the notion that at least the bulk of the money loaned is created ex nihilo.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001070