this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
1239 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

11936 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No every business is a factory or a corporation, most businesses aren't.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most businesses have atleast one employee who has no ownership stake in the company

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And? You understand that socialism is antithetical to the concept of ownership, right? Of course you don't. You don't even understand what it is.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The concept of ownership? Do you think socialistes aren't allowed to own, say, the clothes they wear?

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That depends on the the type of socialism. Marxist socialism let's own a pair of jeans but not a house.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, socialism is antithetical to the concept of non worker ownership.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's not true. Socialism is against the idea of private property outright. The very aim of the socialism as an economic system to collectivize all infrastructure, resources, property, land, and means of production where everything is "owned" by the "public". Something like a co-op where workers directly own the business they operate like a grocery store aren't allowed in a socialist system because that's still private property and the business is engaging in the free market. So even though its worker owned and it follows socialist principles on a micro level, it's antithetical to socialism.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's not true. Market socialism (which is what I support) allows for independent companies.

What you're talking about is Leninism and it's derivatives (which I oppose).

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Market socialism as a concept is vague. Are you talking about something more akin China or Vietnam today or something more idealistic and hypothetical? If it's the former then I assure you that China today is just state capitalism with Chinese characteristics.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Something more idealistic and hypothetical.