this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
347 points (93.9% liked)

Political Memes

9573 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

At the heart of the "we mustn't be distracted away from the Epstein scandal" crowd is the naive belief that we have simply yet to find the perfect argument that, when shown to the frothing genocidal fascists, will somehow magically turn them 180 degrees and renounce american fascism.

It is this supremely liberal idea that you can wriggle yourself out of fascism if you find the right facts and logic, the most epic slam, the most cutting late night TV monologue, to show a right winger and have them renounce fascism. It's based in the incorrect idea that the wheel of history turns via ideas. The idea that the marketplace of ideas, in combination with certain "Great Men", are the ultimate arbiters of history.

Fascism doesn't work like that. You could drop 4k footage of Trump committing the acts, and nothing would change. If you want to halt fascism, you've either got to squash it with guns and tanks, or you give people healthcare, education, retirement, and socialization.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 19 hours ago

There are in denial or ignorant people who don't have fascists beliefs yet that are politically adjacent to the GOP who might waver, we just can't put all our eggs in one basket.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty much. Like I said elsewhere, fascists only pay attention to Epstein when they're upset about other things, with it merely being a conduit to express general dissatisfaction that they otherwise wouldn't admit. Facts aren't the important part for fascists; it's all emotional.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

fascists only pay attention to Epstein when they’re upset about other things, with it merely being a conduit to express general dissatisfaction that they otherwise wouldn’t admit

Very well put

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At the heart of the "we mustn't be distracted away from the Epstein scandal" crowd is the naive belief that we have simply yet to find the perfect argument that, when shown to the frothing genocidal fascists, will somehow magically turn them 180 degrees and renounce american fascism.

I see it exactly the opposite. The focus on the Epstein files feels much more like an admission that they won't listen to rational, logical arguments, and replacing those efforts with rhetorical tactics that do seem to be effective; namely, moralistic outrage.

We've seen that some of his base does respond to the Epstein fishiness. It's driving a wedge between subsets of his base, and I personally know several former MAGAs that have really soured on Trump over it.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 19 hours ago

This cuts at the heart of being a Leftist. Deep inside, we're all secretly convinced that if we can just craft the perfect factually correct well researched well spoken argument, that people will flock to our cause. It just aint true. We can convince some people in that manor but not the majority.

i think there's also this small "hey, this is the one thing that everyone agrees about" element to it

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was agreeing with your argument but you seem to come to the opposite conclusion as me.

These fools already vote against their own interests. They had pensions, union jobs, government funded infrastructure, benefits. They voted to give all of that away and embrace fascism because they were emotionally manipulated to do so. You can give a Truml voter all of the facts you want: climate change, vaccines, immigration, taxes. They aren't moved by any of that. The people who would be moved by that already know better and never would have supported Trump in the first place. I understand a lot of people here fall into that category, but we must be careful not to fall into an echo chamber and ignore just how dumb and irrational huge swathes of Americans are because that's how we got into this mess.

If you want to dislodge Trump's current supporters, you need to attack their emotions. Bombing thousands of Muslim kids in the middle east doesn't move the needle, but a dozen or so good white Christian girls who had their precious virginity stolen from them? (I don't mean to belittle the suffering of the victims, just to illustrate that this appeals to mysoginists and Christian nationalists). That gets clicks, that drives outrage.

Fascists build their own reality and that is only reinforced by any attempt to "debate" them.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the naive belief that we have simply yet to find the perfect argument that, when shown to the frothing genocidal fascists, will somehow magically turn them 180 degrees and renounce american fascism.

This is also why the left infights so much, they are so desperate to have intellectual fights and showcase their logic and reason in a way that matters that all you can really do with that is just pick at other leftist's takes and beliefs.

We probably could have made a lot better progress in effecting change in our country if we all digested the reality a lot sooner that we are NOT arguing our way to a better outcome, that all we could really hope to do is change narratives and change the way the right feels about topics.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah. The right isn't arguing anymore either and I think it's why the liberals are so quick to punch left. Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson falloff being the most obvious examples. They don't care anymore and the liberals are trying to find someone to "debate". The right has largely "won". The "marketplace of ideas" does not result in the most just and good ideas winning. They are having a hard time handling this.

So they're lost. They don't know what to do but discuss ideas and think that that is the only thing that leads to change.

It's a perfect example of why you need to understand dialectical materialism. If all you have is ideas you'll be holding onto those ideas and "winning" your way all the way to the gas chambers. But they continue to criticize any material effort to resist fascist that threatens the existing systems they think will somehow shift back. They will not shift back again. "The marketplace of ideas" is dead and it was never a means of progress in the first place.