this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
638 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12439 readers
2508 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Google Maps obeyed Pedo Daddy instantly when it came to Gulf of Mexico.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Well, sorta?

The name was changed for US users, as google's policy is to use whatever a user's country's official name for something is (also true for where borders are drawn and so on). In mexico (and presumably every other country), it's still "Golfo de México". I don't know if they'll change Lake Ontario to whatever it was trump did but it would surprise me if they didn't, and just as with the Gulf it's going to only be americans that are impacted & everyone else will be continuing to ignore his nonsense.

edit: (You apparently can change your domain to view what it looks like from other countries - though I couldn't figure out how to do it in the ten seconds I tried just now. Some domains display some alternative names in parens too I'm told, though I haven't looked into that one at all. I know in Mexico and Egypt it didn't show up as Gulf of America when I checked, so there's that. The next most famous example is the shitshow that is the Persian Gulf / Gulf of Iran / Arabian Gulf debate.)

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm French and in my case it's "Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)", so yeah both names

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Same thing in Spain. Kind of disgusting they're forcing it on everyone.

CoMaps still shows the proper name (Gulf of Mexico), and no mention of the Gulf of America, so that's another easy win for OSM and CoMaps

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Huh - very interesting! Does it display that way in both english / spanish?

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Oh that's an interesting question. Could be different. But no, just checked for French. It displays the same thing in both English and French

[–] Padit@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

In Germany it says "Golf von Mexiko (Gold von Amerika)".

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

So weird, I wonder why it wasn't doing that in arabic. God it's not enough google is evil, they have to be obtuse about their shit while they do it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's not officially the Gulf of America in the US. The President can't just arbitrarily rename shit.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

In the US, the maintaining authority on references for geographic features is the Bureau of Geographic Names. It's a federal agency operating under the secretary of the interior - and unfortunately, the president does have the unilateral authority direct them to change official names (in theory he can't change it for internal political reasons - declaring something the "Barack Obama memorial dick-shaped rock" or whatever - but I don't know if that has ever been ruled on)

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a public process the agency is required to go through for changing names of places. Trump bypassed that and had the USGS update the GNIS with the name change through an Executive Order and not through the BGN. When called out on it they tried to get it through Congress, but the Senate didn't approve the name change.

It isn't the Gulf of America.

The board actually did vote on the name in 2006, but rejected it.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It is currently listed in the GNIS as "Gulf of America" (you can confirm this here)

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yes. But it wasn't changed through the legal public process, so the GNIS is not accurate.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 9 seconds ago)

From 43 USC Ch. 11A: BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES:

The Secretary of the Interior, hereinafter called the Secretary, conjointly with the Board on Geographic Names, as hereinafter provided, shall provide for uniformity in geographic nomenclature and orthography throughout the Federal Government. The Secretary may exercise his functions through such officials as he may designate, except that such authority as relates to the final approval or review of actions of the Board on Geographic Names shall be exercised by him, or his Under or Assistant Secretaries. (July 25, 1947, ch. 330, §1, 61 Stat. 456) [Emphasis mine]

The above lays out very clearly that the Board of Geographic Names is a non-independent body, reporting to and operating under the authority of the Board but subordinate to the Secretary of the Interior, who possesses the ultimate authority on executive (not procedural) matters.

The Secretary shall cause such studies and investigations to be made and such records to be kept as may be necessary or desirable in carrying out the purposes of this chapter [...]
(July 25, 1947, ch. 330, §4, 61 Stat. 456.)

The above clearly establishes that the creation and maintenance of records is left to the discretion of the secretary.

The Board, subject to the approval of the Secretary, shall formulate principles, policies, and procedures [...] Action may be taken by the Secretary in any matter wherein the Board does not act within a reasonable time. [...] (July 25, 1947, ch. 330, §3, 61 Stat. 456.)[Emphasis mine]

There is recent precedent for this method of directing name changes and this interpretation has been supported by now three administrations, as Sec. Jewell directed (in a much more polite order than that trumpling's tripe) the board to adopt the name for Mt. Denali. The board has since then repeatedly clarified that to override an executive order, they would need the intervention of congress (particularly during the reversion of the name from Mt. Denali).


Since it's establishment, the BGN has operated under the executive direction of the Secretary of the Interior, who in turn is directed by the Executive Branch. There is no requirement, in the initial act, subsequent revisions or in the organizational bylaws (which interestingly have been changed by the trump admin, but I couldn't find a meaningful difference to the archived copies?) that name changes must be submitted through the board, that changes to GNIS require approval by the board or that there was any procedural reason that what Trump did by having the Sec. Interior order the change was in any way unofficial - there

I'm sorry, as much as I wish this weren't the case, you're simply wrong. By every measure the US government has established, that is it's official name in the USA.