this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
746 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31134 readers
3462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Nothing will happen until they are made to comply with physical force.

Or basically - using the exact same measures of enforcement that would be applicable to a normal citizen.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago

WITHHOLDING Food Assistance during the Thanksgiving and Christmas season is Bad BUT this ALSO Effects Trans and Brown Kids so it's NOT a Deal Breaker for me or my Family who are going to Starve and my Newborn will probably die!

-LITERALLY every Republican Voter!

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

They’re probably just going to spend it on getting their weave anyhow. /s

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm so confused. I heard that people won't be getting SNAP benefits. Then I heard that two judges ordered Trump to give them their benefits after all. Then I heard that it's only being partially funded (I guess people are expected to eat only 3-4 days a week). Then I heard Trump is refusing to fund it. Then I heard the Whitehouse said it is being funded despite Trump's social media posts saying otherwise.

So are people getting to eat or aren't they?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

HE defies ALL court orders, what's different NOW???

Not even a slap on the wrist for truly un-American behavior.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Or the dems can hold on and gain on both, especially with a TACO.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

this is rediculous. you guys in congress know that the country cannot remain as a stable and nice place if he is not impeached. you can't just let a president break the law constantly. impeach. impeach. impeach.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 12 points 10 months ago

What congress? The Republicans won't even let the house meet anymore

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Overidding his own administration after they agreed that that they can and will do the thing. Fighting in court to avoid doing the thing. Defying a court order to do the thing. All while blaming the democrats for his not doing of the thing.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Go ahead and make more people hungry, their children hungry. Go ahead and find out what desperation breeds.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I did not see this coming, did you?

/s for the dumb people

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He thinks he holds the purse strings. We'll use it to carry his head to the jeu de paume court.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I'm starting to think he illegally misappropriated those funds and now literally can't use them for their intended purpose cuz he's broke.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think Dems should not pass any legislation while the administration ignores the laws that already exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

That money has already been promised elsewhere in some deal. Make Trump new enemies by denying his ability to pay up.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Exactly what I said. Trump made the law irrelevant. And the Republicans cheer him for this.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don’t get it, with the federal judges saying they need to pay, does he has legal power to ignore court orders

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›