this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
537 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28858 readers
2406 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 174 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

This is what he got fired for btw:

“Charlie Kirk says gun deaths are ‘unfortunately’ worth it to keep 2nd Amendment,” read the headline of an article Michael shared. He did not add any additional comment on it.


And this is how he got back:

a settlement agreement between Michael and the university, showing the school will dish out $500,000 and reimburse “therapeutic counseling services.”

“APSU agrees to issue a statement acknowledging regret for not following the tenure termination process in connection with the Dispute,” the settlement reportedly reads. “The statement will be distributed via email through APSU’s reasonable communication channels to faculty, staff, and students.”

And yes, he's working there again since December. BTW it's $500,000, not 50,000.

Only because he fought back, I presume. Fight back, on all levels!

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 75 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

He was tenured. Tenured professors are supposed to be nearly bulletproof when it comes to job security.

Possibly a poor choice of words given the circumstances...but there is nothing in the original comment that can or should justify firing a tenured professor. Being tenured should protect your job specifically for voicing controversial positions. That's kind of the point.

Though I wouldn't even say this is controversial...it's a verifiable objective fact with no added opinion or emotional language...the timing may make it a bit dark, but that's kind of the point.

It's ironic how so many people are getting shit for saying mean things about a person who was, at the end of the day, a shining example of first amendment rights.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

there is nothing in the original comment that can or should justify firing

no shit

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 2 months ago

The people running these institutions have all revealed an absolute desperation for a cultural zietgiest shift towards right-wing authoritarianism.

They just want it so bad.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 18 points 2 months ago

The thing is, the professor literally didn't say anything. He posted two photos. One was a headline with the Charlie Kirk quote, and one was about his death.

Not bulletproof, and especially not in Tennessee. I actually have a colleague from grad school at AP.

The real thing here is that they have rules on the books and didn't bother to follow them. That often is a monumental fuck up.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its actually quite insanely concerning how few people understand how feebile the MAGAts actually are when directly challenged.

Their success since 2016 has solely been due to lack of resistance, not anything meaningful they've done.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago

I'm going to push back a bit here. Because people say a lot that there is no resistance and, to your point, there isn't any impactful resistance where it matters.

There is a world of difference between people who want to fight for what is right and people who are willing to die for what is right.

The reason we are here is because we have plenty of the former and very very little of the latter.

I do not say this lightly because I fear we are reaching a point that unless people are willing to risk their lives, we will lose our lives to fascism.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Would a potential trial fall under labor dispute (violating tenure agreement) or First Amendment (is the university getting government funding I assume)?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

The person who fired him also got a bonus, probably by bankrupting the early education department.

Okay I made that up, but you know it’s likely.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 months ago (3 children)

“APSU did not follow the required termination process in this matter, and I deeply regret and apologize for the impact this has had on Professor Michael and on our campus community,” the university president said. “I am committed to ensuring that due process and fairness are upheld in all future actions.”

Kind of a hollow apology from the school president. "Sorry we didn't follow the require termination process." No apologies for trying to repress free speech. No apologies for over reacting when the professor posted a quote and nothing else. No apologies for trying to curry favor with an authoritarian regime by falling in line like a good little boy. Seriously, fuck that guy.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 months ago

"Sorry we got caught"

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The $500k counts as an apology

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it doesn't. not to me. that's counts as a plea to let the subject go and move on.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Like a settlement

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

“Charlie Kirk says gun deaths are ‘unfortunately’ worth it to keep 2nd Amendment,” read the headline of an article Michael shared. He did not add any additional comment on it.

Senator Blackburn (R-TN) then pinged the school about that post, and the professor was fired despite the fact that he had tenure and couldn't legally be fired like that. So he used the legal system to find a remedy.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I can read the full article just by blocking javascript

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will it be reported on FauxNews?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I sure hope a lot of qons find out and get very butthurt about it. :)

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 months ago

Where's the headline for the firing of the idiots that caused the institution to throw away over half a million dollars.

Uh oh, better go invade another country and murder an innocent woman before anybody notices.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I love it when people got blowback for literally quoting Kirk.

These dumb motherfuckers never see the irony.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Summary says awarded $50,000, article says $500,000:

Darren Michael, associate professor at Austin Peay State University, has reportedly been reinstated and given $500,000 after being fired over posts about assassinated conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

$50000 won't cover legal bills and $500K sounds like a settlement for breaking academic freedom agreements.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Republikkkan scumbags have such thin skin. DonT MoCk Me GuYs sErIuSweeee iT MaKeS mY hEd SaDddddd. Can't take it, can't dish it out without sounding like whiny little bitches... All they can do is try to cancel--- always at the heart of the so-called cancel culture they hate so much

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Free speech