this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
1163 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

11043 readers
2580 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think they're beautiful. A sign of social and technological progress, hope for the future, human well-being and ingenuity.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

specifically this. also, if youre close, theyre a good marker for direction.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Have you ever spent any time in or close to a large wind farm? Honestly, it's relaxing if you haven't been told to be mad about them existing- they're quiet, sustainable, and once they're built the cost of each new unit of energy they deliver doesn't come with the unit cost and environmental cost of acquiring and burning yet more fuel-- so in that sense, the marginal cost of each new bit of power from them really does approach zero.

Of course, this (that the resulting energy is so cheap) is why the coal/oil/gas folks are mad- they know they won't be able to compete once a grid with sufficient edge-caching/power storage is built out

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 113 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Offshore turbine farms are beautiful imo, very real yet alien-feeling

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think you've hit on something there with your comment. They are sorta alien and a little weird... Everything that terrifies people that think in absolutes and orthodoxies and their puppeteers know this and have been playing them for absolute fools.

The irony is, that their blindness to their manipulators doesn't make them immune to it; they're just a s fucked as everyone else except they're cheering for it.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're like a perfect setting for a liminal space game, endless water all around and a bunch of menacing, all-white and smooth man-made structures where our monkey brains don't expect them

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like something out of the video game "control“

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

I was thinking more like backrooms lost tape pt2, they have my favorite water lever with wind turbines in the distance and gorgeous architecture to walk around

edit: this part in particular

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Cue montage of anime/visual novels that have the pretty protagonists relaxing on a hill with 5 wind turbines in the background behind them.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm uite the same on land ones. I admire the ingenuity of the view. Seeing wind turbines and solar farms on the landscape is nice; cool, even.

People that don't like them, I just don't know why. Maybe they had a traumatic interaction with a desk fan as a kid.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The sentiment against renewable energy is about as rational as the sentiment against vaccines. Yet here we are.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Honestly I think that any community that objects to wind farms or solar panels just on irrational bases like that should get an oil derek built in the centre of town, even if it's just for show. Just to make the point.

A lot of it is NIMBYism, it's not that they don't want wind farms it's that they don't want wind farms here. Because they think that if you don't build a wind farm in their community you'll also not build a cold burning power station in their community. Often this is correct because what is a good location for wind farm is a bad location for a power station.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I agree! They seem graceful and elegant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The argument that they mess up landscapes was always made in bad faith. Grasping at straws.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Rather than that, it's a veiled NIMBY argument. They don't care that nuclear, gas or coal power plants look uglier - they would if they would stand in their backyard.

They similarily don't really care about the optics of wind turbines, but they are afraid of javing them in their backyard, which is much more likely than a power plant if you don't live near a river

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When I bought my house one of the things that I was warned about was that they were going to make the nearby wind farm larger. Some of the locals got up in arms about them building a new wind farm until they pointed out that they are just enlarging the current wind farm.

None of the residents could tell me where the current wind farm was, because you literally cannot see it, it's behind a hill. If they hadn't told anyone they were enlarging it I don't think anyone would have noticed. Even if you go around the hill so you can actually see it, it just blends into the background. I do wonder why they don't just paint them blue though.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Im guessing they want them to stand out for safety for pilots

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Fuck you and your ~~sour grapes~~ tulips, Dutchman!

Signed,

A jealous Estonian

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yesterday I had to go on a long drive. During that drive, I passed a yard in which someone had placed an obviously homemade billboard with the words "wind turbines destroy family, environment and quality of life."

I was flatly stunned to see it. I've heard that stuff about them killing birds but I've never heard they were otherwise contentious. In fact, everyone I know personally loves to go look at them given the opportunity.

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Isn't even the bird thing wildly overstated?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The problem is its actual history.

Windmills did kill way too many birds

  • when they first built at Altamont pass, a natural constriction on a major migratory bird route
  • when they used open lattice towers, which present tons of tempting roosting spots
  • seems like at least one more major factor.

But this was in like the 1970s and they paid attention. Since then, wind turbines kill effectively zero birds, but it’s a huge problem when there’s an actual grain of truth that conservatives can grab onto and never let go

Edit: apparently still in production despite the poor site, but it looks like they cut bird fatalities in half and are looking at newer turbine designs to be safer. I guess the real lesson is don’t build in a mountain pass constricting a major Migratory bird route

[–] Life_inst_bad@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Speaking in German numbers:

Wind Energy kills arround 100.000 Birds a year. Lovely furrballs arround 20.000.000 (likely more) Glass plates like windshields, Windows etc. Arround 100.000.000 So yeah pretty minor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

They probably "destroy family" because the children of the idiot boomers that put the sign up no longer speak to them over politics

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

See, stuff like this is why we need photographers and photo journalists. They're not just documenting things, they're making a point. They're making art.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Cooling towers... So that's just water vapor... aka steam. Hence why it's white.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This isn't a discussion of emissions, it's a discussion of aesthetics.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I enjoy seeing wind turbines along a landscape. Feel this this is some boomer shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

More wind turbines, less oil rigs on the horizon please.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And think of the birbs! Would someone please think of the bribs! They get confused by the propeller blades, and start migrating under water, where they get stuck in deep sea vents, causing blockages for ocean currents and costing the shipping industry billions. Damn you, liberals!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

A few miles west of here are two wind generation fields, bout 60 miles in the other direction is a petroleum processor. The windmills are infinitely less of an eyesore.

load more comments
view more: next ›