this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
531 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28312 readers
2672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US Democratic Senator Mark Kelly has said he will "seriously consider" running for president in 2028 as he battles the Trump administration over a video in which he urged military personnel to refuse illegal orders.

The Arizona senator, who was accused of "seditious behaviour" by Donald Trump over the November clip, said he and his wife, Gabrielle Giffords, received "many" death threats after the president's comments.

"We get them on a weekly basis now," he told BBC Newsnight. "We had to get security to protect us 24 hours a day."

Asked if he was considering a White House run, the retired Navy captain said he was considering it "because we're in some seriously challenging times".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

ITT: People placing their hopes on a presidential race when they don't even know if they are even going to be able to have a legitimate rollover on the midterms.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Personally, what I am hoping for is a ticket with AOC as president, and Mark Kelly as vice. He can help AOC with military issues, while she can guide the nation towards some flavor of Democratic Socialism.

I think we will see a civil war, so we definitely need a military expert in a major role. Kelly should do nicely.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Personally, what I am hoping for is a ticket with AOC as president, and Mark Kelly as vice.

I'd rather AOC take over the Senate and replace Schumer as majority (minority for now, but majority forever) leader. She'd have more influence for longer than just being a president.

[–] noevidenz@infosec.pub 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As far as I know, there's no reason that a president couldn't return to the Senate after their term is up. So why not both?

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Ben Franklin did it.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's fair. IMO, the presidency is more important in this political environment, since setting the direction and tone of the nation is important.

It sucks that we don't have lots of a high-profile progressives, because the spread of competent and fiery people is a bit too thin. Our agenda shouldn't have tradeoffs about who is best for what.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

IMO, the presidency is more important in this political environment, since setting the direction and tone of the nation is important.

Maybe. What's more important in setting the shape of the administration? The dough (cabnet, legislative agenda, international stance) good for just 4 years? Or the mold that dough must pass through?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

It really depends on whether a president gets two terms, and now the possibility of a civil war. Senate is good if you expect normalish times...which is iffy. I think the midterms will decide what tack AOC and friends will follow.

If it were possible, I wouldn't mind Sanders being the 2028 candidate, if he still has a sound mind and the conditions allow for a peacetime president. Setting aside age, I kinda worry that he lacks sufficient hostility to prosecute the Epstein class - because he is a gentle dude, IMO.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

He seems ready to fight, and seems fearless. He has my vote if he starts demanding trials, convictions, and jail time for the traitors and pedophiles.

[–] Astrius@lemmy.ml 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Worker led revolution please this system doesn’t serve us.

[–] orcmode@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Here here. We need to counter the brownshirts before we worry about electorialism.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

i like mark kelly and gabby would be a fantastic first lady but please not right now; we need a radical to clean up the mess.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

We need a Warrior, who will go after MAGA's crimes likes it's personal. I don't care who it is, old, young, man, woman, black, white, anybody, everything else is on the back burner. We can't get this country on any kind of a track until we ruthlessly crush MAGA, purge it from our government and our country, and harshly punish them for their crimes. Only then, can we start to make plans to redeem our Nation in the eyes of our citizens, the world, and history

I'll vote for anybody who pledges to make that their primary priority as POTUS.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

Aside from lacking apparent credentials, I think Ilhan Omar would be a good wartime president. She wanted to punch the bastard that squirted at her, which is the right response to Republican jackasses.

The age calls for Teddy and Franklin Roosevelts: People willing to get into the fight, and contend with the issues of their times.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Remember MAGA chanting "lock her up"? We need that energy now for the Democrats, lock Trump up ... imprison all of these corrupt pieces of filth and seize their grifted assets.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

I'm totally with you, brother.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Elroc@lemmus.org 26 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So if he wins he will be at retirement age when he is starting? Are you sure he is old enough for American voters?

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 13 points 18 hours ago

He's not nearly senile enough

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I am hard pressed to think of a democrat I would vote for in a primary over him.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

A lot of lefties going to complain about his support for israel, even if modest. But honestly I cannot see another viable candidate in the wings. We have a couple years still but things are getting scary in terms of actual prospects and we're going to have to throw our hats in with someone (other than Newsom) so Kelly is probably going to be a great bet, he appeals to the largest swath of moderate America who are tuned out and just want to hear that someone strong and professional will keep them in their comforts, and he has enough established clout with the legislative branch that he already has political capital, they won't be afraid of working with him.

And he's seen Earth from space, and had to be a caregiver for a wife who was the victim of a political assassination attempt, I imagine that builds all the best kind of character and empathy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of lefties going to complain about his support for israel, even if modest.

Really depends on who he is running against and how he positions himself along the way. If he's out saying "Israel is our oldest and dearest friend, they just made a few mistakes" or god forbid "Anyone critical is anti-Semitic" he's DOA. If he's out there saying "We spend billions of dollars so Israel can have clean potable water and top tier health care, so it's time to bring those amenities back to the US", he can probably hurdle that criticism well enough.

he appeals to the largest swath of moderate America who are tuned out and just want to hear that someone strong and professional will keep them in their comforts

I mean, Biden appealed to these same voters by adopting half of Bernie Sanders's platform and half of Hillary Clinton's. Then he spent four years yelling at people for using TikTok and arguing the need to kill more brown people.

Kelly's fine on paper, but if he opens his mouth and sounds like another "moderate Dem"... I think he's going to have the same kind of trouble Cuomo did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And I will seriously consider voting for just about anyone else left of him in the primary. No offense to him, he seems like a very solid dude, but the time for half-measures, centrists, and people that believe institutions will save us is well beyond over.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 56 points 1 day ago (23 children)

You nailed it on the head. If AOC runs, I’m absolutely voting for her. If not, Kelly seems a lot better than Newsom.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ya I'm done placating Dems, anyone left of Gavin or Kelly will have my vote. I've played it safe the last 2 elections with trump. We need a Hail Mary. Not more complacent. Marks only in this for a personal grudge, which is fine but when it come to big picture he will be just another dem.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

I just realized while walking my dog today that a new hard line for me with Democrats is that if you accept corporate / billionaire PAC donations, I'm not donating to your campaign.

I cannot continue to pretend like you will actually give a fuck about my interests when you got into office using mostly money from sources that are actively working against my interests.

I'll still vote as left as possible in both the primary and the general regardless, but I'm through giving campaign contributions to candidates where my money -- and therefore my influence -- is a drop in the bucket.

load more comments
view more: next ›