this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
344 points (97.8% liked)

politics

28845 readers
2245 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Critics put Donald Trump on blast on Monday after he posted a message on social media threatening Iran with “Death, Fire and Fury.”

Writing on his Truth Social website, Trump said any attempt to block oil shipments would lead to an attack “TWENTY TIMES HARDER” ― and so severe that it will be “virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again.”

Iran has responded to the U.S.-Israeli military campaign by threatening to attack ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, effectively cutting off some 20% of the world’s oil. That’s triggered wild fluctuations in the market for crude oil, rising gas prices at U.S. pumps and fears of further economic pain should the conflict drag on.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I hate this "journalism" which is just reporting that people on a social platform are making fun of what someone else said on a social platform.

Why the fuck is someone's reaction newsworthy?

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Why the fuck is someone's reaction newsworthy?

Would I find especially inane are the reactions to the reaction to trumps reaction.

Anyone who is against Trump in the US who is isn't openly calling for a general strike at this point is complicit and part of the controlled opposition.

The US should be in a fucking shut down, over 12 months ago due to the crapulance of this regime let alone what it has done this year.

I've stopped watching Stewart, Colbert and Seth. Even independents like Bernie and AOC should be pushing but they're not.

Nothing is going to change if they don't bring the country to a standstill

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

If it got you to click and trigger their ads then it's worth it to them. That's all it takes.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

He will die without seeing any.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

But.... Hear me out... What if...

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

Kinetic consequences, hopefully

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 142 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

"People on internet are mad at stuff Trump says on internet."

Brilliant reporting. Why not make the article about how unhinged the shit he was saying was, not the reaction of people to it?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 24 points 16 hours ago

Because it's HuffPost, which has always been more of a clickbait-farm for liberals than a journalism outlet.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 12 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Because one of those is journalism and the other is editorializing, most outlets have a section for both.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

Don’t forget to give credit to individuals and organizations ‘slamming’ him.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 60 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Our arsenal:

  • Slam
  • Torch
  • Blast
  • Hammer
  • Drag
  • Criticize
  • Oppose

Their arsenal:

  • Arrest
  • Murder
  • Disappear
  • Deport
  • Maim
  • Detain
  • Bomb

Gee guys I sure like our odds

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

If only our arsenal weren't metaphorical meanings of those words, we'd be doing pretty alright

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 32 points 14 hours ago

I read this same headline every two weeks since 2016 (great 4 year break in between)

[–] Ansis100@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The oil prices are affecting us in Europe too. Gas is getting wayyy more expensive. My car also isn't very fuel-efficient...

And I think this is wonderful news if it teaches that fuckface a valuable lesson.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Unfortunately necessities and commodities getting more expensive doesn't mean anything to the elites. Tarrifs and increased cost of living significantly disproportionately affects poors and working class people. For a rich person, fridges doubling in price is still a cheap purchase. For a poor person that needs a fridge and could hardly afford one before price doubled, they certainly can't afford one now. Once again the poors carry society on their shoulders. Gas went up? U think rich people even notice? Hell no. But us working people now have to decide between eating lunch on Saturday and driving to work next week.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Hey psst I'll sell you this old fridge I found with a dead cat in it if you sell some of your blood

-capitalism and its solutions

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 74 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

The US president is AI slop.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 49 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no fan of AI, but don't blame this on it, this is 100% organic slop. It has neither the A, nor the I.

[–] normanwall@lemmy.world 27 points 17 hours ago

N.I. - Natural Idiocy

The knights weren't saying it for no reason

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

So the usual

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 48 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

He's threatening nukes, he already mobilized the bombs. Now would be a good time for other countries to cut the US off. US won't rally and rise up unless we suffer. Make us suffer you pussies.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

It really does look like he’s trying to find an excuse to use them.

If he does he needs to go to be removed from office, and all countries need to sanction the US.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

WTF do you mean, "if he does?" He already needs to be removed from office now, and the notion that he's thinking about using a nuke only makes it even more imperative that he be removed before that happens!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago

I agree with everything you said.

But if the US doesn’t grow a spine on this they’re fucked beyond help.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 12 hours ago

His brain was never functional to begin with.

When God was handing out brains, he heard "trains" and said "no thanks, I'll drive myself."

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

love those em dashes, grok really pulling overtime for this one. or maybe openai now that the pentgon contract has been signed

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

He absolutely has dementia or Alzheimer’s and he absolutely had a stroke or TIA at the 9/11 memorial (I’m sure it’s not the first time). He probably has a laundry list of other medical issues to boot.

Any other 80 year old man with this medical history is in a locked memory unit, but this one is ruining our fucking lives.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

He very clearly shit himself while on TV a few weeks ago, and its not headline news because reality is crazy town these days. I fully expect the day they announce he croaks to be a lie and they have been "Weekend at Burnies"ing him around for atleast 72 hours prior.

If that happens early next year around his terms half-way point I fully expect a "Death of Stalin" scenerio (from the begining of the film, where they have to find the best Dr in Moscow, but cant, because they threw them all out of the country and finding one would mean the violated Stalins orders) because if Vance has to server for more than half the remaining term, he can only run for re-election once.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

If his administration applied itself to this country's problems with even a fraction of the same lively vigor with which they were suddenly shooing reporters out of the freshly stank-filled Oval Office after he took that presidential shit, this world would be a different place right now. I'm not even joking.

EDITED to add: the comments are comedy gold

[–] fatboy@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

A compilation of tweets is just not news. Not that this threat is not important, but that I wish there were real reporting in this article.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard to say what tweets count as. The White House has said they are official messages at times, and Musk was held legally required to purchase a company because of his statements made on the platform. At one point I believe they were all being archived to the library of Congress, not sure if they are anymore. Then again I believe Trump's are on his site, so who knows

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 2 points 8 hours ago

I believe Fatboy is referring to the fact that over half the "article" is just a bunch of embedded tweets reacting to what Trump posts on his social media site. There's not actual reporting going on.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

He remembers blaming Biden for high gas prices. Now he's afraid of being seen as responsible for the same. Which he demonstrably is. So his threats will escalate as his fear intensifies.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know. That would require like 3 or 4 coherent thoughts in a row.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 7 points 13 hours ago

I get that it's fun to mock this man, but I feel like it also defangs the perception of him. People were laughing at how unlikely his victory would've been back in 2016 and now we're here ten years later. This man is evil. He's impulsive, and temperamental, and incredibly powerful.

He's caused immense suffering among people, he's stomping all over their rights, he's kidnapped a head of state and he's now started a war. Please, take the danger this man represents seriously.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"Torch", "Blast", etc. are funny words that mean nothing to someone who doesn't pay attention to anyone other than himself.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Been seeing a lot of "torch" lately... I'm thinking the headline writers in the US see "torch" as the new "slam".

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Headline writers torch headlines with the word “slammed”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daxelman@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't torch shit he's not on fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] X@piefed.world 1 points 10 hours ago

lol next you’ll be telling me that raindrops, when not being blown in any other direction, frequently fall down. okay. 👍

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

What's the excuse for almost the entirety of the Republican party and the accompanying RINOs then? The fact is that he is such a compulsive liar that nothing he says matters, he's just a noise maker that works it into a distraction from what he is doing.

load more comments
view more: next ›