Microblog Memes

Please remove the link to the youtube channel at the very bottom. It sdoes not seem to have anything to do with the rest of your post and looks like a conspiracy theory-mill. Otherwise I will have to remove the entire post, wich I'd prefer not to do.

If it ever gets to this point, I have a ton of books to read. I just won't use a computer anymore. You'll find me under a tree in a park reading 1984.

Legislators have no idea how technical stuff works. Imagine imposing this requirement on a Raspberry Pi, which has no document scanner or webcam to scan your Government Approved ID or Unique Human Face. Either the device has to be mandated to include a camera or some other similar bullshit, or it doesn't have a way to scan your face or ID. So it would be noncompliant by default, but if you could mandate a camera is included, then you'd have to mandate that it requires the scan and gatekeeps the operation of the device without it, and so on... just a bunch of ridiculous bullshit.

Maybe get rid of all the child molesters we fucking already know about if you want to protect kids you fucking assholes.

The part that frustrates me the most about all of this is how it's a chess move towards a massive power-grab by the few and monied. What's more frustrating is how many people completely miss this, instead focusing on this first move.

We can argue the validity and the expense required in complying with such laws, especially the egregious "on every device" language. But that's not the point.

Up front, only the most powerful and well-connected will be able to comply and lobby for exceptions to this law. And the only feasible way to pull this off is with 100% cloud-connected devices that are already prepared to gather biometrics and basically stick a camera in your face. That means that Apple, Microsoft, every cellphone vendor, every cell network provider, are pre-selected as winners in this race. Anything else can't possibly come up to this level, and/or won't due to the obvious ethical conflicts it causes.

Looking at an even bigger picture, the problem sets up widespread de-facto censorship. It's surveillance and a cudgel for sites that don't participate in said surveillance, all in one.

We've already seen major social media consolidated and owned by the obscenely wealthy and powerful, who are nakedly well-connected with government. Requiring ID to use these sites effectively pushes anyone with a brain OUT of that space. Algorithms were already punching-down on our ability to coordinate and find common ground across the (largely artificially generated) political divide. Now, we're self-segregating and retreating to spaces like Lemmy. The proposed laws would make it much harder to start and maintain alternate media, and hosting an environment full of dissenting opinions would be well-documented and served to law enforcement on a silver platter if ID laws are adhered to. But if you don't comply? Be prepared to lose that whole site since it'll be illegal to do so.

Any info about who is pushing this so hard right now? It seems too much of a coincidence that this seems to be pushed everywhere around the world atm. Makes me think it's not the usual incompentent police and secret service combination

I don't think I want the Epstein class to have an easy way to determine who is (and therefore also isn't) an adult over the internet.

Internet enabled device? So Ethernet, wifi, and cellular modules? Network switches? Routers? Modem? What does it even mean?

Maybe we just rename the Internet, problem solved. My computer is now milfnet enabled, idk what "Internet" is, I connect to the milfnet.

I heard it was Meta pushing all this age verification legislation all over the country. And of not, I'm sure it's some other evil company.

So, like, my internet-connected lightbulbs would have to verify my age, too?

I’m getting tempted to go off the grid and just make do with meshstatic or such.

I refuse to live in a big brother world.

its all to feed the surveillance obsessed PALINITIR that thiel has been hawking at govts about. it isnt a coincidence he started coming out of the woodwork and talks about it, when he is always very secretive from the media.

My mood gets obliterated whenever I open Lemmy nowadays.

Yeah, no. Get turbo-fucked.

"What if I rape you?"

"NO!"

"What if I rape you just a little bit?"

"NO!"

"What if I just rape your little toe, then, surely you won't mind?"

"NO!"

"Ok what if I just rape your little toe nail? Be reasonable!"

"NO!"

"Ok, but what about if I just rape part of your little toe nail? It's to protect you from pedophiles, after all, surely you don't want to protect pedophiles are you?"

"I mean..."

"RAPE IT IS!"

My theory is that the pedophiles in charge want a way to verify they are talking to an authenticated minor, too much time wasted talking to Chris Hansen types.

Any device? So my router? My pet feeder? My raspberry pis?

I’ll go back to buying porn in person with cash.

We're going back to usenet

Our company builds control devices for conferences. They are network accessable. So we would need some kind of age verification for a device that switches microphones on and off. Makes sense, does it?

(Sorry, I'm from Finland, I don't know much about the finer points.)

Well this is good. The folks in New York don't need to worry about mega noisy AI data centers in their backyards anymore!

Or any other kind of datacenters!

Or internet infrastructure as a whole!

ISPs will just have to chuck their gear in the Atlantic! No way they'll implement this shit for every single piece of gear. Because they know users won't put up with authorising themselves at every network hop through NY.

Let me quote a joke IT security exam from the late 1990s:

"Your computer has just received a packet from the network. What do you do? Do you need a sledgehammer or is a smaller hammer enough?"

This is what is ahead. Don't give in!

Australian government over here taking notes...

You better be using Linux if you want to have any control about the software running on your machine whatsoever.

Yep, California and Colorado are honestly not horrible laws. New York's here is horseshit, and every citizen should be screaming at their senators and representatives extremely loudly about this in New York. If you aren't, you're okay with them.

New York's requires

Covered manufacturer… determined via one or more commercially reasonable age assurance methods…

This is biometric scanning, ID checks, whatever. California's only requires there exists a way to create a child account, and mark it as "child". New York's is MASSIVELY worse. People, call your senators, kill this bill in committee NOW