What are you talking about, he has absolutely won the war. It's distracting from the Epstein files, that was his goal of going to war. Mission Accomplished.
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
138 points (99.3% liked)
politics
28872 readers
2696 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
America learned nothing from ~~past war failures~~ anything.
America has loads of smart people who study the past and have learned all kinds of knowledge.
America openly despises those people and prefers leaders whose intelligence level is closer to the average American.
My dad always loved to say (just slightly tongue in cheek), the problem with representative democracy in America is it works!
Last time they elected a person whose IQ closer to a floor mop.
Those people that know things are slated to be the first for the struggle sessions about how expertise is woke and therefore, bad.
Vietnam took years because Nixon as a candidate colluded with the SVA and told them not to sign any treaties cuz if he won the election, then he'd get them a better one.
Johnson not being able to end the war, got Nixon the election...
Do people just honestly not know about this stuff?
How would they? You need an education for that.
If these people could read, they'd be very upset.jpg
No you don't.
Anyone can look up anything they want on the internet.
We need to normalize the expectation that people educate themselves
There's an infinite amount of things to learn. Suggesting that everyone should have self studied this particular topic is dumb.
Dude we still have to tell people about Iran Contra with a musical number. Lower your expectations.
What?! You kids don't know about the great patriot Ollie North?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFV1uT-ihDo
In fairness, that's been the best way to explain it for like 20 years now, but it's not the only way
Amazing Oliver North lived to see this and somehow IS STILL ON FOX NEWS
I don't know about that. Do you have any references?
From 13 years ago, so not "new" anymore
Thank you!
You expect Trump to actually know history? I guarantee you that motherfucker has never read a book, let alone his cast of socialites he's put into positions of power in his administration with zero experience.
He can't even remember the last thing he said to somebody a day before. Just ask Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
So is it any surprise that this war would be any different? No. I'm actually surprised he hasn't dropped a fucking nuke yet.
He can read when he wants to. The problem is that Trump has only ever been seen to read one book:
Last April [Note: article published in 1990] perhaps in a surge of Czech nationalism, Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler's collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler's speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.
"Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?" I asked Trump.
Trump hesitated. "Who told you that?"
"I don't remember," I said.
"Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he's a Jew." ("I did give him a book about Hitler," Marty Davis said. "But it was My New Order, Hitler's speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I'm not Jewish.")
Later, Trump returned to this subject. "If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them."
If this was Sid Meier's Civ 6, playing Trump as Leader would be like having an overwhelmingly powerful military, but declaring war starts with high war weariness, and only gets worse for them from there.
It feels like playing the ERE in Attila Total War.
- Powerful military.
- Iran wants to kick your ass.
- Loyalty to you is very important to prevent rogue generals.
- Climate change is fucking everything up.
- Outsiders keep blowing up your ~~oil~~ city infrastructure.
Also you already have negative gpt, and half of your strategic resources are imports from nations that cut you off when you go to war
In Civ, can you get chat for gpt?
Oh don't worry. I am sure that we aren't done with losing this one, not by a long shot. I imagine it will stretch into the next Democratic administration so the Republicans can run on a "no wars" platform again.
What are you guys, 11?
No one wins a war, the point of war is to spend billions in munitions.
Don't discourage him; he can just keep loosing this war more spectacularly. 🍿