this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1034 points (92.5% liked)

Political Memes

11943 readers
2119 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 9) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As a society and species that only survives by way of humans, having children supporting humans with children makes sense.

The hot take in the OP is dumb, selfish, and short sighted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

This seems like a bad faith take. If you have dependents — and I would include animals — then you have obligations to them. Employers tend to have carveouts for those obligations because they are universal to all humans.

Needing to care for a sick dependent is not the same as your middle-of-the-day champagne-and-pilates class, Sharon.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -3 points 2 months ago

Not exactly, you don't deserve to get dick days for your child being sick if you have no child.

Also you deserve additional leneancy when your child is sick. Cannot plan for that. They just do that and need more supervision than your sick partner.

Most things that reduce non parent's ability to work can happen to parents equally.

Vacation does in fact suck though. A lack of child shouldn't make it harder for you to take a vacation. But your employer also must enable parents to take time off when their kids need supervision, so that sounds like a staffing issue.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (27 children)

I think people fail to understand what it means to work in America. Y’all Europeans really have no clue how bad we have it. If your job is accommodating you because you have kids and someone else complains, your company doesn’t accommodate both. They cancel your accommodation because of “fairness”. There is no ADA accommodation for kids.

The fact they agreed to it in the first place is a miracle. So yes people with no kids need to stfu. You already winning by keeping your money and more free time. Let parents have this one thing.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I feel like people don't think half a step ahead.

The children that these parents are taking care of, will probably grow up and work. Their work will allow our retirement. People without children just don't provide the same utility to the society.

We need "young people" and if we are unwilling to invest in that, we won't have them. And then we all moan about lack of social safe nets and pension safety.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›