this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
425 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

11690 readers
2331 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 10 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

I am convinced all the climate change predictions were WAY too generous and reality is gonna be far worse.

[–] ReHomed@lemmy.cafe 2 points 35 minutes ago

It will be even worse than what you're expecting right now

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 6 minutes ago

Doesn't matter what your intentions are.

Doesn't matter what earnings you posted this quarter.

Doesn't matter if you believe in climate change.

Doesn't matter if you need this truck.

You're on this rock of wind and water and it'll do what it needs, to get back to it's equilibrium. That might be at a level we don't exist anymore nature is emotionless and you can't control it.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 17 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah just don't fall into the old mistake of weather = climate. Heat waves happened before climate change as well. But our current changing climate makes them more likely to happen more often and more intense, if I am informed correctly.

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's not high summer, and 40C is crazy. This is climate chang. Saying it's weather is oil propaganda.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Its not one or the other, that's overly simplistic. Using this one data point to "prove" climate change is about as honest as someone bringing a snowball into congress to prove it's fake.

You need both to prove a sustainable point, otherwise it's forgotten with the next cold snap. This is one extreme data point, and it helps to showcase the problem, but it is not the only one. Use it as part of a whole, not as a singular showcase.

Thats my interpretation of OPs comment.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago) (1 children)

Idk when record-breaking high temperatures are showing up weekly I think they stop being "extreme" data points

Outliers aren't outliers anymore when all the measurements are in that range

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

That they're outliers of what has been the norm for centuries is the entire point. Saying "this is the new normal" is, as you might surmise, normalizing it.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 43 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The cynic in me imagines that the media purposely promoted the longer timelines to lull people into thinking we had more time, and so there was no rush.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 44 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

I think it's more about scientists being extremely conservative with their estimates, because they know they'll get impaled over being 'alarmist.'

And then (effectively) fired from their job.

Also, you should check out conservative coverage. There is no timeline compression, its strait up cynicism, hostile denial.

EDIT: I forgot hand wringing. A perfect example: fairly scientific family showed me a WSJ article about how future geoengineering is going to make climate change a non-issue.

"Offended" did not begin to describe my reaction.

I've been reading geoengineering research papers for years, and they amount to things like:

Well, if we redirected a significant portion of the global economy to custom airplane and chemical production, we could rain sulfuric acid over the poles and wipe out all life beyond a certain latitude, and maybe counter the warming some if we keep it up... ecological implications aside, its still rather impractical, but an order of magnitude cheaper than previous proposals. Shows table.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

The thing is each individual issue feeds the speed of the rest. Sun melting ice from above, rising sea temp melting from below and both speed the other up. There's thousands of things like this. I'm not an expert or anything I just remember reading something like this.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 56 points 4 hours ago

I expect climate change to be consistently worse than the mainstream predictions.

There's a huge political incentive to err on the side of downplaying than to exaggerate, and those models should have been bad enough to make the point.

[–] verstra@programming.dev 65 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

We could really use a covid-style lockdown for a few years.

Naaah. Get your lazy asses back to the office... so its market value doesn't decrease.
Also, no wind turbines or any such humbug in our neighborhood... so we can keep increasing rents. Which we, the boomers, decided ourselves, through collective hypnosis. Also, what's with this freeloader mentality? Imagine if any of the hoi-polloi could simply use wind and sun. Like, for themselves.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 33 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

But this time no cure until we wipe out all the anti mask/ anti vaccine idiots first

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 33 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

And "AI" idiots who insist on burning entire areas just to generate shrimp Jesus memes

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Ai data centres used about 0.5% of global electricity production last year. Electricity production is about 26,000 TWh annually, versus total energy production of 185 TWh annually, so AI was about 0.07% of all energy consumption. Energy production causes the bulk of greenhouse emissions: 73.2%, putting AI on 0.05% (this is unfair to AI, because electricity is cleaner than the average energy production which includes just burning gas for heat).

In comparison, trying to find something small on https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector my favourite comparison is that energy for making paper consumes more than 10x as much as does AI.

A large TV might consume about 100W while on, so 100Wh to watch for an hour. To reach the same consumption with AI, you'd need to run about 55 expensive (the upper estimate I found was 6700J - I assume this means long coding answers, research or image generation) chatgpt queries.

Personally I think it unlikely that someone would reach that 1 prompt per minute at that expensive estimate, so all yourself: is AI really "burning entire areas" compared to just watching TV?

It has it's problems but this is a moral panic.

[–] guywithadeathwish@lemmy.world 3 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

It all well and good comparing data centre energy usage with global production. But you miss out the important reality that a good chunk of the data centres running today and in the near future are using fossil fuel power on-site, without a grid connection, which is so much worse.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

Be honest. Even if every single data centre did that, would it worse enough to really change the picture? It's still going to be less than paper production by a long way for a long while.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

However there is sharp growth in demand being predicted and I don't see any sign of humanity trading in some other power usage to get their data center power allocation. Even if we're are greening the grid it is all for nothing if the extra capacity has to be filled in by more fossil fuels.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 23 minutes ago

Yes, about 12% per year these days. Not enough to really change the picture for a long time, though.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And the fascist oligarchs. Maybe lock em in submarines and drown the lot of em.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 3 points 1 hour ago

We don’t need a covid-style lockdown to do that. Just saying.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The anti-mask/no jab people were convinced to be dangerous by billionaire propaganda.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Genocide is cool so long as it's targeting the people I think are vile and sub-human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Everything is fine...

AC is quite rare in France. So everyone is basically cooking alive. Except the politicians because of course their workspace has AC.

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

AC could add like 10°C to the streets during a heatwave, + any emissions from faulty equipment is massively more powerful than CO2

Putting AC everywhere is not a solution by any standard...

What we need is thermal insulation for the buildings

[–] Doug@piefed.social 35 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

This is one of the reasons my spouse and I opted to not have kids. This place is doomed.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago

Dude I feel so incredibly guilty for bringing my kids into this horror. You're doing the right thing.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Given that overpopulation likely contributes to climate change, you're also doing your part for those who do have to live through this hellscape!

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 42 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Slow cooked until our meat falls off the bone...

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 40 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Chat we're not just cooked we are battered and deep fried.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

”salivates in southern US”

[–] Klear@piefed.world 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You shouldn't needlessly salivate. That water is needed for datacentres.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Oh yea my bad, umm what if I salivate Brawndo? It’s got electrolytes

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

ChatGPT, how do I cook a climate? Please respond in Old English and rhyme

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 51 minutes ago

Tis better the weather threw back into flight
A cyclone, a tempest, a sky without blight

[–] manxu@piefed.social 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

As a Person Living In France, I can confirm it feels like someone put an oven in every room. Even places with A/C mostly can't keep up with the heat. The only safe space is the car with working A/C.

We are rapidly reaching temperatures where life becomes impossible, and we'll need to be indoors from May to October. And we are just getting started.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If people can live in the desert then life isn't impossible. Tear down the buildings built for the old climate and build new purpose built structures. Find new times of the day to get outside. It's not impossible unless you insist on not changing.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 50 minutes ago

shades rigged up between opposing buildings over a street should be a thing

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I've been checking in on my friends in europe, stay safe stay cool.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I work in HVAC, maybe I should move to Europe...

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

So I was curious about this, and asked my barber (yesterday) how much the aircon he had installed was.

I was told the unit costs (~£1600) were exceeded by the install/labour, and that all they did was the unit fitting & plumbing/pipe to the external unit. An electrician had to be separately hired to wire it all up.

So I’m conservatively guessing somewhere around 3.5k all in.

For one of those normal units, I’d estimate as about 70x25cm, cooling an area less than my living room.

I’d say anyone looking for a trade in the UK right now, would be wise to skill up on doing it as a one stop shop, and cash in for the next decade.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Portland, Oregon, in °C (cause I never learned Fahrenheit)

It’s not typically known for being a hot place, but this is just the weather report for today.

We’re so very fucked.

(yes watch is in Japanese cause that’s what I grew up speaking and I don’t want to lose it despite having pretty good English, get off my back)

Edit: and then I checked the weather report for later. We’re not cooked, temporarily. Grand scheme of things, thoroughly fucked. But the eye of the storm feels nice.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I've lived within an hour or so of Portland my entire life, and 24C (75F) has always been a reasonable temperature for late June

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] microcapybara@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hey friend, you sound like you’ve had a rough time with people trying to get you to “integrate” or some such. Your choices of how you experience the world and technology aren’t any one else’s concern and whatever they are, they are valid. I live and work in highly international environments and basically everyone prefers their native tongue for things like computer/phone interface.

Fuck the haters, stay cool, peace out ✌️

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I learned English when I was eleven and spent my twenties and thirties masking as yet another basic white American chick, and then in my late thirties I realized that just cause I’m not the exact ethnicity I needed to be for my childhood to be easily believable (white kid growing up on an Air Force base in rural Japan) that I didn’t need to hide it, and that I should celebrate who I was when I was barely a meter tall, thirty years ago. I try my best to keep up my Japanese, but I don’t look like someone who speaks it, which is great when I overhear people shit talking me for being trans or whatnot.

I could take an hour and learn Fahrenheit, but I just don’t want to. I know Fahrenheit for values over 300 anyway: set oven to the number on the box.

さあ、しょうがないね。

(dear solitary downvoter: I’m interpreting your solitary downvote as me explaining my reasoning for why I am how I am, and you just saying “no” with no further context or detail. It was folks like you that caused me to mask up and hide my past for so long. In conclusion, go fuck yourself, solitary downvoter. I’m not gonna fade out of existence, or go back to pretending I like cappuccino and Blazers, just cause you said “no.”)

load more comments
view more: next ›