this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
655 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11690 readers
2704 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

43 Celsius...along the Atlantic coast too.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 29 minutes ago

Someone linked this as the 2014 broadcast: https://youtu.be/_s55xNz26qQ

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

You can argue with scientists all that you want to, they're not infallible, it's true.

But you were warned for many decades, don't act all shocked and surprised.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 33 points 3 hours ago

Doesn't matter what your intentions are.

Doesn't matter what earnings you posted this quarter.

Doesn't matter if you believe in climate change.

Doesn't matter if you need this truck.

You're on this rock of wind and water and it'll do what it needs, to get back to it's equilibrium. That might be at a level we don't exist anymore nature is emotionless and you can't control it.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's 43 celsius? Holy shit, good luck to the french, it will soon be everyone.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Last summer in Canada my car read 44C. Was fucked up.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

You know it's crazy. This weekend I drove through Southern Utah Arizona and Vegas in Southern California. It was 109° in Las Vegas 106 in St George Utah and 105 and Baker California. But it's expected in those areas during the summer. Canada that's insane to have those temperatures. It's hard to fathom that in France. Maybe in the south of France where it's closer to the equator. But it's still crazy to me. Well not crazy it's further proof of global warming. Not that anyone that can do anything cares.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Was your username inspired by the air quality that day?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago

Nope, they turned into soup last summer and have been that way ever since

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago

No you just haven't adjusted the numbers for inflation

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 41 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I am convinced all the climate change predictions were WAY too generous and reality is gonna be far worse.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago

They were

Scientists always were afraid to be too alarmist and be ignored, so they always went conservative with their estimates.

Now we are here

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 8 points 3 hours ago

Yep that's my fear

[–] ReHomed@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 hours ago

It will be even worse than what you're expecting right now

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

People in Brittany in 2014: oh we’ll be fine no worries 😙

People in Brittany in 2026: what da fuk just happen? 🥵

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4yrb8hRFKQ

Mozinor, la météo du futur. Not a clip on climate, more a parody about canicule. France had gone through the 2003 heatwave with an awful lot of casualties amongst old people. Had cost his seat to an unskilled unqualified health minister (something Mattei) under Chirac last presidency. The clip is typical of Mozinor with childish high-pitched voice and many video samples of blockbusters. In France there is no copyright when it comes to "détournement" of a scene from a movie. I believe Mozinor is still active but I don't follow anymore. 300, dead zone, Olivier Besancenot, 007, baboulinet, search for any of these adding Mozinor to the request , if you are curious

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 26 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah just don't fall into the old mistake of weather = climate. Heat waves happened before climate change as well. But our current changing climate makes them more likely to happen more often and more intense, if I am informed correctly.

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago

Look up how many heatwaves happened in France during the 20th century, and how many happened in the last 10 years. Yes, weather on any single day is not climate, but we are quite past "oh heatwaves happened before".

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not just heat waves, average has also increased - https://showyourstripes.info/s/europe/france/all

[–] bumblefumble@mander.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

We are projected to potentially have the warmest day ever recorded in Denmark this weekend, I would call that a direct sign of climate change.

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not high summer, and 40C is crazy. This is climate chang. Saying it's weather is oil propaganda.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Its not one or the other, that's overly simplistic. Using this one data point to "prove" climate change is about as honest as someone bringing a snowball into congress to prove it's fake.

You need both to prove a sustainable point, otherwise it's forgotten with the next cold snap. This is one extreme data point, and it helps to showcase the problem, but it is not the only one. Use it as part of a whole, not as a singular showcase.

Thats my interpretation of OPs comment.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Idk when record-breaking high temperatures are showing up weekly I think they stop being "extreme" data points

Outliers aren't outliers anymore when all the measurements are in that range

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 52 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The cynic in me imagines that the media purposely promoted the longer timelines to lull people into thinking we had more time, and so there was no rush.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 57 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I think it's more about scientists being extremely conservative with their estimates, because they know they'll get impaled over being 'alarmist.'

And then (effectively) fired from their job.

Also, you should check out conservative coverage. There is no timeline compression, its strait up cynicism, hostile denial.

EDIT: I forgot hand wringing. A perfect example: fairly scientific family showed me a WSJ article about how future geoengineering is going to make climate change a non-issue.

"Offended" did not begin to describe my reaction.

I've been reading geoengineering research papers for years, and they amount to things like:

Well, if we redirected a significant portion of the global economy to custom airplane and chemical production, we could rain sulfuric acid over the poles and wipe out all life beyond a certain latitude, and maybe counter the warming some if we keep it up... ecological implications aside, its still rather impractical, but an order of magnitude cheaper than previous proposals. Shows table.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verstra@programming.dev 81 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

We could really use a covid-style lockdown for a few years.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 49 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

But this time no cure until we wipe out all the anti mask/ anti vaccine idiots first

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 49 points 7 hours ago (11 children)

And "AI" idiots who insist on burning entire areas just to generate shrimp Jesus memes

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 72 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I expect climate change to be consistently worse than the mainstream predictions.

There's a huge political incentive to err on the side of downplaying than to exaggerate, and those models should have been bad enough to make the point.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

About a decade ago a group did a study on it.

They first created a simplified model. That model was still a fairly good match with the fully featured models. They then varied the parameters around reasonable possible values. If scientists were using most likely assumptions, you would expect a 50/50 split of better/worse predictions.

In practice it was 93% worse. Scientists were (unconsciously) using a lot of best case figures, not expected case.

When I read about that, and the complete lack of follow-up coverage, I knew we were fucked.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I came to the same conclusion after reading papers and articles for years and every year it got a little bit worse and a little bit sooner. Just following the trajectory of the changes in their expectations told me that we would hit ~+6°C by 2100.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Which I don't blame the original scientists or studies for. Their predictions were bad enough that we should have done something then. It's been clear for at least 30 years.

They did what they thought would have the most traction and not get them dismissed as crackpots. And, to be clear, they were still within a margin of error. They weren't generally wrong, considering their margins. It's just that they're not going to be perfect and they made the better choice.

Even now it would be easier to dismiss climate change if the reality ended up better than predicted, even if it was still bad.

[–] Doug@piefed.social 45 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

This is one of the reasons my spouse and I opted to not have kids. This place is doomed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›