this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
587 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30868 readers
2543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gigabit goal “prejudicial” to satellite and wireless

Ah, so money changed hands. Got it.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is still ISDN in the US and it's still there to uphold artificial scarcity and price fixing. Broadband in the US is basically neutered to ensure that the ISPs can buy cheaper equipment and maintain high pricing.

It's also why they wanted to remove network neutrality, so they also could gouge small data centres and make backroom deals with big tech giants.

I know you may hate the word "data centre", but if the small ones can't compete, say goodbye to any form of competition.

[–] cosmos8188@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The word data centre is primarily a problem if its used in the context of AI.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 2 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, my daughter was complaining about data centers, and I pointed out she meant AI hypserscaler data centers, and that I work in a data center, a small old fashioned one that just runs internet and TV for people.

[–] PacketPilgrim@thelemmy.club 3 points 21 hours ago

Xfinity must have got to them.

[–] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

Ah yes. In Germany we call this "Technologieoffenheit" and do not consider internet speeds, but car's.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 22 hours ago

Today’s abolitionists aren’t nearly as cool.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

As soon as I hear "FCC" I ignore it as it's nothing more than the old "money/power/control" triumvirate that currently exists within and amongst the trump regime. The people still have the real power. Look at how ABC now has some spine after the people bit hard into their collective subscription coin-gathering process.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Turtles are great and all, but dammit I want my pipes fast.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

So they're in favor of net neutrality?!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

Did they get paid by a POTS modem maker? Is someone trying to resurrect US Robotics?

[–] Rujo@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt it, major shift with most carriers to get rid of old switching gear. New gear isn’t being made, old gear is expensive to maintain, and FFC has been changing a lot of rules around the service. Its now, near impossible to get new POTS traditional services anymore. Today it’s mostly POTS in a box; 5G wireless to a ATA device, with battery backup for survivability.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I've always wondered if an old modem would work through VOIP. But it might rely on some frequencies that aren't encoded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago

Read the article...?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] custom_username@reddthat.com -5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not entirely upset at this. It seems like any advances in computing and network speed these days are used as an excuse to collect more data and make software more inefficient. Also from a global warming perspective, if you're into that, it may be time we start looking at things from a sufficiency standpoint rather than efficiency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world -5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

My dad got grumpy when I told him I used an app to do my laundry instead of a sack of quarters. Then he got real grumpy when I explained it was better in every. single. way.

This is that, in policy form. (EDIT: This is the important part, not how I do my laundry)

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The main disadvantage that I see is the quarter-laundry machines were pretty easy to modify so that you didn't need to pay them. The whole app thing appears to be a lot more difficult to hack, the coin machines can be disabled with a screwdriver.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I do not miss broken laundry rooms. They never stopped at disabling the quarter machine, lets get them quarters that are in there! "Oops, we bent the frame and the door doesn't close until someone comes to fix it." Good times. These good guy hackers you remember running around dispensing free gas and blowing up ATMs never existed.

BTW, there's still a quarter machine for people that want it.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 1 points 20 hours ago

These good guy hackers you remember running around dispensing free gas and blowing up ATMs never existed.

My building mysteriously had the wonky coin payment system bypassed after the landlord began to truly embrace his inner pos and stopped fixing them. I feel the other tenants enjoyed the benefits of having the only functional pair of machines in the complex at the low, low cost of press the button more than I did.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›