this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
776 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31231 readers
2682 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's been a great deal of backlash against Flock cameras, with constant vandalism and numerous reports of crooked cops misusing them, leading to more and more communities to cancel their contracts. While Flock has received the most backlash, there are other ALPR companies out there. Rather than ending their use of technology that spies on you, and in a move that doesn't really solve the problems associated with mass surveillance, some departments that have dropped Flock have simply switched to other companies that do the same thing, reports NPR.

One of those competitors is Axon. If that name sounds familiar, it's probably because you've seen it displayed on body cam videos, since Axon is the leading supplier of body cams to law enforcement, according to The Intercept. After a bit of rebranding in 2017 (the same year Flock was founded), many people don't know that Axon is the company formerly known as Taser, the electrical stun gun — another technology that police never, ever misuse.

While Flock had to develop not only its technology, but also its law enforcement contacts and clients, Axon already had the clients in its Rolodex thanks to its other products. Law enforcement agencies may be fleeing from Flock contracts like rats from a sinking ship, but they still want ALPR technology. In places like Denver, Colorado, for example, switching ALPR providers is easy when you're getting your new camera tracking access through a supplier you likely already do business with.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

They're testing to see if we're dumb enough to fall for such a switcheroo.

I suspect most of us are.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

There are officials responsible for approving the installation of these cameras. The only thing that will stop this is to make them fear the consequences of doing so.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fortunately sledgehammers and angle grinders are cross-platform compatible.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Flock cameras are conspicuous with their unique design and can even be identified with a Wi-Fi & Bluetooth scan. Other ALPRs are impossible to tell from conventional CCTV or use all kinds of masking.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Oh darn. They'll all have to go then.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I appreciate the name of the new company being included right in the headline. I hope vigilantes get down to business cutting down these awful Jalopnik cameras!

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They are adamant about being able to watch us at all times. This doesn't end with flock.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

A methhead convinced of the bountiful copper inside doesn’t care about branding. All cameras = flock and flock = temporary happiness to them.

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Every time an article like this comes and you are tempted to reply to the seemingly inevitable creeping surveillance apparatus with "well, it can't stop a paintball/hacksaw/.50 cal/etc. etc." you need to stop.

Stop for a moment and listen to yourself. Look at the bigger picture. I admire the bravado and pushback but does this really sound like a reasonable solution to a systemic issue? That's like saying "if I think there's cockroaches infesting my house, I'll just step on everyone I see" Like that is going to solve the problem.

(And honestly, are you really going to get off your lazy ass, go buy a portable angle grinder and go cut down a light pole in the middle of the night? Really? How many beers does that take?)

So, next time you want to post something like that, instead, just post a link in support to the person, be it a politician or advocate, who is willing to legislate against this encroachment of privacy.

Oh, you don't know of any?

Well maybe that's actually getting to the heart of the problem.

This is true everywhere, but especially in the US, if you are looking right now at current events aghast with a feeling of doom rolling over you- that is the sign.

It's time to stop being a passive acceptor of circumstances. It's time to act.

We have to dig political aspirants out of the woodwork and push them onto the stage. There is somebody in your area that is capable of advocating for your rights. You need to find them.

If you can't find a local group. Start a discord, IRC, hell facebook page, what ever, just start connecting people in your town, in your neighborhood. All it takes is a few minutes a day to start.

You have to be politically active. Or else your future is going in the meat grinder. Nobody is coming to save you.

There is no group who has an interest in keeping you, your society, your children, your futures, free from fascist control. Not the DNC, not the State government, not city hall. There is only you and your friends. You have to fight for it yourselves. When the garden is left untended the weeds take over. The weeds have taken over. It's time to return to the garden.

It can be done. The people hold all the power - Provided They Are Given A Plan of Action To Follow. You need to help craft that plan. Organizing and agitating gets results. Facts.

Stop posting bullshit on Lemmy and start posting real shit in your local advocacy group.

[–] mrspaz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You do both.

As you've noted, we've unfortunately entered the era of "hard work" in defense of our own liberty. But as you've also noted, there's few champions. So you can vote conscientiously, support grassroots efforts when you find them, but also maybe clip a camera pole with the work truck while you're going about your day.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Think of it as a team building exercise.

I don't think you can truly know a person until you've committed a felony or two together.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

We still need them to remind us that there are still heros out there.

[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US is not a democracy for the masses. The only people who get say are the people who pay money in bribes.

https://pnhp.org/news/gilens-and-page-average-citizens-have-little-impact-on-public-policy/

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's the way it is but not the way it should or can be.

The American people have largely abandoned their civic duty and disengaged from the process. We are reaping what we, and our parents, have sown and it's not pretty. Complacency, escapism, consumerism, feelings of disempowerment, having taken their toll.

Contrast that to a literal workforce that runs 24/7 backed by billions from special interest groups who have been seeking to undermine the republic for decades now. Decades. It's no wonder the system is corrupt and the democratic process fails to serve the people. We've allowed it to happen, but we can also undo the damage.

It's an uphill battle but the garden belongs to the people. The fruits of our labors belong in our baskets. This miasma can be dispelled the moment people say they've had enough and stand up en masse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Maybe me think of that guy that was interviewed who was like "we ain't putting them back up immediately. We'll wait a while and everyone will forget and move on, and we'll put them back up then"

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely this will confuse people enough that they won't know what cameras to smack.

I'm kinda shocked they don't either put them on next to the streetlights out of reach or pay the DOT to replace their lane activity cameras with what they need and pay them to deliver the footage back

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's more difficult from a jurisdictional perspective. For instance, you may an intersection of 2 streets that are owned by the city and the county with signals owned by the state but under control of a regional transportation authority formed by an interlocal agreement of 20 separate jurisdictions.

We just did a contract in my city for a new traffic monitoring system for 3 signals in town and it involved the city, county, state, and 2 neighboring cities.

ALPRs are poisonous enough right now you wouldn't get all 5 of those entities to sign on at once.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

interesting info, thanks!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

San Diego approves smart streetlight cameras

San Diego police will soon be able to rely on surveillance cameras and license plate readers attached to 500 streetlights citywide, after the City Council approved their use Tuesday.

Also, we have this style, mounted high up on poles at the major intersections in my town, well out of reach of vandalism.

Yes, I know these are likely not used for the tracking people, or at least weren't originally installed for that. But, what's to keep them from upgrading or replacing them with ones that look the same to serve the same function as Flock cameras? No one would even notice. Sensor resolution, and optics for small cameras keeps improving.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 34 points 2 days ago (8 children)

But not out of range of a paintball gun.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or a drone with spray paint.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was personally thinking a pseumatic gun with a solid projectile shot, would probably take a lot of testing to get the right range, accuracy, and power though.

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Crazy how .50cal airguns aren't federally classified as firearms.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well for one there's ideally no fire involved. But also we are talking about something that has limited manufacturing and hasn't been used for anything large scale yet so yeah. Also would you really trust the current federal government to classify a sandwich? Let alone anything more complex.

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you mean one of the many pneumatic airguns you can buy for hunting and the like? The ones that aren't classified as firearms and thus aren't nearly as legally restricted or regulated as firearms despite being able to deliver similar accuracy and kinetic force?

And yes, the fed hasn't been super great at making logical distinctions between objects in general commerce. They're silly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surely the pole it's mounted on connects to something..?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, yes. Usually mounted on extensions to a traffic light pole. You're not cutting it down with a hacksaw, at least.

Imagine this on top of a traffic light:

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm going to take this opportunity to ask: what actually reduces crime and improves public safety?

I feel like I should know the answer to this already (education and universal healthcare) but yet the discussion of crime reduction always revolves around increased police presence and surveillance technology.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I feel like I should know the answer to this already (education and universal healthcare) but yet the discussion of crime reduction always revolves around increased police presence and surveillance technology.

They will spend more to fight socialism than it'd cost to actually impliment socialism.

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You forgot equity.

A piece of the pie helps as well.

Education and all that we have in spades right now, but ask young people how wages are.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

You know what doesn't stop crime? A camera.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

it's not about reducing crime or improving public safety. It's about finding "riff raff," like protests, nevermind the right to peacefully assemble is in the Constitution. But also, these are warrantless searches on our private property. Yeah, annotating our car, model, and its dings; that's private property.

Effectively, it's an unlawful autonomous police member.

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 52 points 2 days ago

Cop cars have ALPR’s mounted on their trunk lids too. America is hung up on “Flock” instead of the states and federal government surveillance everyone, legally innocent or guilty, for everything.

Within seconds, Axon Outpost, a compact, solar-powered ALPR camera perched quietly on a nearby pole, flags a match: silver SUV, roof rack, visible bumper sticker. It sends the alert to AxonFusus, which instantly cross-references the livestream with a dozen other nearby feeds, pulls the path of travel, and pushes it straight to officers in the field. Within minutes, the child is found safe

Correction: within minutes, heavily armed trigger happy police murder a black man to discover there is no child, and that the AI powered system made another false-positve

They call paramedics to collect the dead body, and immediately drive away in a frenzy to attack the next innocent person due to the near constant steam of alerts from this hallucinating system.

[–] PizzaLamp25@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

If it looks like a flock, acts like a flock... then it's a flock camera. Different names doesn't mean anything. They should all go away.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 11 points 2 days ago

halloween is coming, just saying

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago

And guess which company gets product placement in The Rookie with both name and logo every time there's body cam footage in a scene (which happens every episode, usually several times per)?

That's right, Axon!

That and all the copaganda REALLY gets in the way of enjoying the charm of Nathan Fillion 😮‍💨

[–] OldMan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

High vis vest, hard hat, mask, telescoping pole and a plastic bag with glue could be used for "maintenance".

[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

That's OK I'm sure our reciprocating saws will work in both.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Inevitable. The next generation will be imperceptible and thus impossible to vandalize.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Vandalism was never a permanent solution. Accountability for local elected officials who think their constituents are idiots is the solution.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. This too can be covered in spray paint and be cut down

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I appreciate the enthusiasm, but how will you cut this down? This is where they'll be mounted next:

Also, the only reason there's been any success is because of social awareness. I have no doubt those types of posts are now being stifled. Perhaps you can fly a drone up and paint a lens, but almost no one else will even if you do. That's beyond the skill set of most people.

Vandalism isn't going to work, it needs to be addressed at the policy level, that means protests, attending city council meetings, and paying attention and voting in local elections. Not nearly so fun to post videos of this for likes on social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago

I fully expected that. Flock gets to be the sacrificial lamb for the surveillance camera industry.

load more comments
view more: next ›